On the Limitations of Carbon-Aware Temporal and Spatial Workload Shifting in the Cloud

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.06502v2
• Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 19:36:04 GMT
• Title: On the Limitations of Carbon-Aware Temporal and Spatial Workload Shifting in the Cloud
• Authors: Thanathorn Sukprasert, Abel Souza, Noman Bashir, David Irwin, Prashant Shenoy
• Abstract summary: We conduct a detailed data-driven analysis to understand the benefits and limitations of carbon-aware scheduling for cloud workloads. Our findings show that while limited workload shifting can reduce carbon emissions, the practical reductions are currently far from ideal.
• Score: 0.6642611154902529
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Cloud platforms have been focusing on reducing their carbon emissions by shifting workloads across time and locations to when and where low-carbon energy is available. Despite the prominence of this idea, prior work has only quantified the potential of spatiotemporal workload shifting in narrow settings, i.e., for specific workloads in select regions. In particular, there has been limited work on quantifying an upper bound on the ideal and practical benefits of carbon-aware spatiotemporal workload shifting for a wide range of cloud workloads. To address the problem, we conduct a detailed data-driven analysis to understand the benefits and limitations of carbon-aware spatiotemporal scheduling for cloud workloads. We utilize carbon intensity data from 123 regions, encompassing most major cloud sites, to analyze two broad classes of workloads -- batch and interactive -- and their various characteristics, e.g., job duration, deadlines, and SLOs. Our findings show that while spatiotemporal workload shifting can reduce workloads' carbon emissions, the practical upper bounds of these carbon reductions are currently limited and far from ideal. We also show that simple scheduling policies often yield most of these reductions, with more sophisticated techniques yielding little additional benefit. Notably, we also find that the benefit of carbon-aware workload scheduling relative to carbon-agnostic scheduling will decrease as the energy supply becomes "greener".

Related papers

• The Sunk Carbon Fallacy: Rethinking Carbon Footprint Metrics for Effective Carbon-Aware Scheduling [2.562727244613512]
  We evaluate carbon-aware job scheduling and placement on a given set of servers for a number of carbon accounting metrics. We study the factors that affect the added carbon cost of such suboptimal decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-19T12:23:59Z)
• Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning in Spectral Domain for Point Cloud Learning [49.91297276176978]
  We propose a novel. Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) method for point cloud, called Point GST. Point GST freezes the pre-trained model and introduces a trainable Point Cloud Spectral Adapter (PCSA) to finetune parameters in the spectral domain. Extensive experiments on challenging point cloud datasets demonstrate that Point GST not only outperforms its fully finetuning counterpart but also significantly reduces trainable parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T17:00:04Z)
• CarbonClipper: Optimal Algorithms for Carbon-Aware Spatiotemporal Workload Management [11.029788598491077]
  carbon-aware workload management seeks to address the growing environmental impact of data centers. mathsfSOAD$ formalizes the open problem of combining general metrics and deadline constraints in the online algorithms. rm Cscriptsize ARCscriptsize LIPPER$ is a learning-augmented algorithm that takes advantage predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T22:08:06Z)
• Generative AI for Low-Carbon Artificial Intelligence of Things with Large Language Models [67.0243099823109]
  Generative AI (GAI) holds immense potential to reduce carbon emissions of Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) In this article, we explore the potential of GAI for carbon emissions reduction and propose a novel GAI-enabled solution for low-carbon AIoT. We propose a Large Language Model (LLM)-enabled carbon emission optimization framework, in which we design pluggable LLM and Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-28T05:46:28Z)
• LACS: Learning-Augmented Algorithms for Carbon-Aware Resource Scaling with Uncertain Demand [1.423958951481749]
  This paper studies the online carbon-aware resource scaling problem with unknown job lengths (OCSU) We propose LACS, a theoretically robust learning-augmented algorithm that solves OCSU. LACS achieves a 32% reduction in carbon footprint compared to the deadline-aware carbon-agnostic execution of the job.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-29T04:54:22Z)
• Sustainable AIGC Workload Scheduling of Geo-Distributed Data Centers: A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Approach [48.18355658448509]
  Recent breakthroughs in generative artificial intelligence have triggered a surge in demand for machine learning training, which poses significant cost burdens and environmental challenges due to its substantial energy consumption. Scheduling training jobs among geographically distributed cloud data centers unveils the opportunity to optimize the usage of computing capacity powered by inexpensive and low-carbon energy. We propose an algorithm based on multi-agent reinforcement learning and actor-critic methods to learn the optimal collaborative scheduling strategy through interacting with a cloud system built with real-life workload patterns, energy prices, and carbon intensities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-17T02:12:30Z)
• Chasing Low-Carbon Electricity for Practical and Sustainable DNN Training [4.0441558412180365]
  We present a solution that reduces the carbon footprint of training without migrating or postponing jobs. Specifically, our solution observes real-time carbon intensity shifts during training and controls the energy consumption of GPU. In order to proactively adapt to shifting carbon intensity, we propose a lightweight machine learning algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-04T21:33:29Z)
• Counting Carbon: A Survey of Factors Influencing the Emissions of Machine Learning [77.62876532784759]
  Machine learning (ML) requires using energy to carry out computations during the model training process. The generation of this energy comes with an environmental cost in terms of greenhouse gas emissions, depending on quantity used and the energy source. We present a survey of the carbon emissions of 95 ML models across time and different tasks in natural language processing and computer vision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-16T18:35:00Z)
• Estimating the Carbon Footprint of BLOOM, a 176B Parameter Language Model [72.65502770895417]
  We quantify the carbon footprint of BLOOM, a 176-billion parameter language model, across its life cycle. We estimate that BLOOM's final training emitted approximately 24.7 tonnes ofcarboneqif we consider only the dynamic power consumption. We conclude with a discussion regarding the difficulty of precisely estimating the carbon footprint of machine learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-03T17:13:48Z)
• Measuring the Carbon Intensity of AI in Cloud Instances [91.28501520271972]
  We provide a framework for measuring software carbon intensity, and propose to measure operational carbon emissions. We evaluate a suite of approaches for reducing emissions on the Microsoft Azure cloud compute platform.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-10T17:04:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.