Systematic analysis of the impact of label noise correction on ML Fairness

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.15994v1
• Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 08:08:14 GMT
• Title: Systematic analysis of the impact of label noise correction on ML Fairness
• Authors: I. Oliveira e Silva, C. Soares, I. Sousa, R. Ghani
• Abstract summary: We develop an empirical methodology to evaluate the effectiveness of label noise correction techniques in ensuring the fairness of models trained on biased datasets. Our results suggest that the Hybrid Label Noise Correction method achieves the best trade-off between predictive performance and fairness.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Arbitrary, inconsistent, or faulty decision-making raises serious concerns, and preventing unfair models is an increasingly important challenge in Machine Learning. Data often reflect past discriminatory behavior, and models trained on such data may reflect bias on sensitive attributes, such as gender, race, or age. One approach to developing fair models is to preprocess the training data to remove the underlying biases while preserving the relevant information, for example, by correcting biased labels. While multiple label noise correction methods are available, the information about their behavior in identifying discrimination is very limited. In this work, we develop an empirical methodology to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of label noise correction techniques in ensuring the fairness of models trained on biased datasets. Our methodology involves manipulating the amount of label noise and can be used with fairness benchmarks but also with standard ML datasets. We apply the methodology to analyze six label noise correction methods according to several fairness metrics on standard OpenML datasets. Our results suggest that the Hybrid Label Noise Correction method achieves the best trade-off between predictive performance and fairness. Clustering-Based Correction can reduce discrimination the most, however, at the cost of lower predictive performance.

Related papers

• Fair-OBNC: Correcting Label Noise for Fairer Datasets [9.427445881721814]
  biases in the training data are sometimes related to label noise. Models trained on such biased data may perpetuate or even aggravate the biases with respect to sensitive information. We propose Fair-OBNC, a label noise correction method with fairness considerations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T17:18:18Z)
• Extracting Clean and Balanced Subset for Noisy Long-tailed Classification [66.47809135771698]
  We develop a novel pseudo labeling method using class prototypes from the perspective of distribution matching. By setting a manually-specific probability measure, we can reduce the side-effects of noisy and long-tailed data simultaneously. Our method can extract this class-balanced subset with clean labels, which brings effective performance gains for long-tailed classification with label noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T07:34:37Z)
• Learning with Imbalanced Noisy Data by Preventing Bias in Sample Selection [82.43311784594384]
  Real-world datasets contain not only noisy labels but also class imbalance. We propose a simple yet effective method to address noisy labels in imbalanced datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T10:34:53Z)
• Combating Label Noise With A General Surrogate Model For Sample Selection [84.61367781175984]
  We propose to leverage the vision-language surrogate model CLIP to filter noisy samples automatically. We validate the effectiveness of our proposed method on both real-world and synthetic noisy datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-16T14:43:27Z)
• Quantifying and mitigating the impact of label errors on model disparity metrics [14.225423850241675]
  We study the effect of label error on a model's disparity metrics. We find that group calibration and other metrics are sensitive to train-time and test-time label error. We present an approach to estimate the influence of a training input's label on a model's group disparity metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-04T02:18:45Z)
• Simultaneous Improvement of ML Model Fairness and Performance by Identifying Bias in Data [1.76179873429447]
  We propose a data preprocessing technique that can detect instances ascribing a specific kind of bias that should be removed from the dataset before training. In particular, we claim that in the problem settings where instances exist with similar feature but different labels caused by variation in protected attributes, an inherent bias gets induced in the dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-24T13:04:07Z)
• Neighborhood Collective Estimation for Noisy Label Identification and Correction [92.20697827784426]
  Learning with noisy labels (LNL) aims at designing strategies to improve model performance and generalization by mitigating the effects of model overfitting to noisy labels. Recent advances employ the predicted label distributions of individual samples to perform noise verification and noisy label correction, easily giving rise to confirmation bias. We propose Neighborhood Collective Estimation, in which the predictive reliability of a candidate sample is re-estimated by contrasting it against its feature-space nearest neighbors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-05T14:47:22Z)
• Dash: Semi-Supervised Learning with Dynamic Thresholding [72.74339790209531]
  We propose a semi-supervised learning (SSL) approach that uses unlabeled examples to train models. Our proposed approach, Dash, enjoys its adaptivity in terms of unlabeled data selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-01T23:52:29Z)
• Tackling Instance-Dependent Label Noise via a Universal Probabilistic Model [80.91927573604438]
  This paper proposes a simple yet universal probabilistic model, which explicitly relates noisy labels to their instances. Experiments on datasets with both synthetic and real-world label noise verify that the proposed method yields significant improvements on robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-14T05:43:51Z)
• Fair Classification with Group-Dependent Label Noise [6.324366770332667]
  This work examines how to train fair classifiers in settings where training labels are corrupted with random noise. We show that naively imposing parity constraints on demographic disparity measures, without accounting for heterogeneous and group-dependent error rates, can decrease both the accuracy and the fairness of the resulting classifier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-31T22:35:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.