Structure in Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Survey and Open Problems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16021v3
• Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 14:40:51 GMT
• Title: Structure in Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Survey and Open Problems
• Authors: Aditya Mohan, Amy Zhang, Marius Lindauer,
• Abstract summary: Reinforcement Learning (RL), bolstered by the expressive capabilities of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) for function approximation, has demonstrated considerable success in numerous applications. However, its practicality in addressing various real-world scenarios, characterized by diverse and unpredictable dynamics, remains limited. This limitation stems from poor data efficiency, limited generalization capabilities, a lack of safety guarantees, and the absence of interpretability.
• Score: 22.77618616444693
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement Learning (RL), bolstered by the expressive capabilities of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) for function approximation, has demonstrated considerable success in numerous applications. However, its practicality in addressing various real-world scenarios, characterized by diverse and unpredictable dynamics, noisy signals, and large state and action spaces, remains limited. This limitation stems from poor data efficiency, limited generalization capabilities, a lack of safety guarantees, and the absence of interpretability, among other factors. To overcome these challenges and improve performance across these crucial metrics, one promising avenue is to incorporate additional structural information about the problem into the RL learning process. Various sub-fields of RL have proposed methods for incorporating such inductive biases. We amalgamate these diverse methodologies under a unified framework, shedding light on the role of structure in the learning problem, and classify these methods into distinct patterns of incorporating structure. By leveraging this comprehensive framework, we provide valuable insights into the challenges of structured RL and lay the groundwork for a design pattern perspective on RL research. This novel perspective paves the way for future advancements and aids in developing more effective and efficient RL algorithms that can potentially handle real-world scenarios better.

Related papers

• Mechanistic Interpretability for Large Language Model Alignment: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions [16.821238326410324]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable capabilities across diverse tasks, yet their internal decision-making processes remain largely opaque.<n>Mechanistic interpretability has emerged as a critical research direction for understanding and aligning these models.<n>We analyze how interpretability insights have informed alignment strategies including reinforcement learning from human feedback, constitutional AI, and scalable oversight.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T11:43:57Z)
• Unifying Causal Reinforcement Learning: Survey, Taxonomy, Algorithms and Applications [35.74838344207327]
  Causal reinforcement learning (CRL) offers promising solutions to challenges by explicitly modeling cause-and-effect relationships.<n>We categorize existing approaches into causal representation learning, counterfactual policy optimization, offline causal RL, causal transfer learning, and causal explainability.<n>We provide future research directions, underscoring the potential of CRL for developing robust, generalizable, and interpretable artificial intelligence systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-19T23:37:22Z)
• Human-Allied Relational Reinforcement Learning [35.901573687779525]
  relational extensions (RRL) have been developed for structured problems that allow for effective generalization to arbitrary number of objects.<n>We introduce a novel framework that combines RRL with object-centric representation to handle both structured and unstructured data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-17T19:56:03Z)
• Rethinking the Role of Dynamic Sparse Training for Scalable Deep Reinforcement Learning [58.533203990515034]
  Scaling neural networks has driven breakthrough advances in machine learning, yet this paradigm fails in deep reinforcement learning (DRL)<n>We show that dynamic sparse training strategies provide module-specific benefits that complement the primary scalability foundation established by architectural improvements.<n>We finally distill these insights into Module-Specific Training (MST), a practical framework that exploits the benefits of architectural improvements and demonstrates substantial scalability gains across diverse RL algorithms without algorithmic modifications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-14T03:03:08Z)
• Part I: Tricks or Traps? A Deep Dive into RL for LLM Reasoning [53.85659415230589]
  This paper systematically reviews widely adoptedReinforcement learning techniques.<n>We present clear guidelines for selecting RL techniques tailored to specific setups.<n>We also reveal that a minimalist combination of two techniques can unlock the learning capability of critic-free policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-11T17:39:45Z)
• Can One Domain Help Others? A Data-Centric Study on Multi-Domain Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning [32.665418383317224]
  We present a systematic investigation of multi-domain reasoning within the RLVR framework.<n>We focus on three primary domains: mathematical reasoning, code generation, and logical puzzle solving.<n>Our results offer significant insights into the dynamics governing domain interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-23T13:51:04Z)
• Inverse Reinforcement Learning Meets Large Language Model Post-Training: Basics, Advances, and Opportunities [62.05713042908654]
  This paper provides a review of advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) alignment through the lens of inverse reinforcement learning (IRL)<n>We highlight the necessity of constructing neural reward models from human data and discuss the formal and practical implications of this paradigm shift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-17T14:22:24Z)
• Discovering Temporal Structure: An Overview of Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning [49.46436458692833]
  This work aims to identify the benefits of HRL from the perspective of the fundamental challenges in decision-making.<n>We then cover the families of methods that discover temporal structure in HRL, ranging from learning directly from online experience to offline datasets.<n>Finally, we highlight the challenges of temporal structure discovery and the domains that are particularly well-suited for such endeavours.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-16T22:36:32Z)
• Vision-EKIPL: External Knowledge-Infused Policy Learning for Visual Reasoning [17.421901873720156]
  This paper proposes a novel RL framework called textbfVision-EKIPL.<n>It introduces high-quality actions generated by external auxiliary models during the RL training process to guide the optimization of the policy model.<n>It achieves up to a 5% performance improvement on the Reason-RFT-CoT Benchmark compared to the state-of-the-art (SOTA)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-07T16:37:46Z)
• Crossing the Reward Bridge: Expanding RL with Verifiable Rewards Across Diverse Domains [92.36624674516553]
  Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has demonstrated significant success in enhancing mathematical reasoning and coding performance of large language models (LLMs) We investigate the effectiveness and scalability of RLVR across diverse real-world domains including medicine, chemistry, psychology, economics, and education. We utilize a generative scoring technique that yields soft, model-based reward signals to overcome limitations posed by binary verifications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T08:22:49Z)
• A Survey on Explainable Deep Reinforcement Learning [18.869827229746697]
  Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) has achieved remarkable success in sequential decision-making tasks across diverse domains. Its reliance on black-box neural architectures hinders interpretability, trust, and deployment in high-stakes applications. Explainable Deep Reinforcement Learning (XRL) addresses these challenges by enhancing transparency through feature-level, state-level, dataset-level, and model-level explanation techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-08T05:30:31Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey of Reinforcement Learning: From Algorithms to Practical Challenges [2.2448567386846916]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm in Artificial Intelligence (AI) This paper presents a comprehensive survey of RL, meticulously analyzing a wide range of algorithms. We offer practical insights into the selection and implementation of RL algorithms, addressing common challenges like convergence, stability, and the exploration-exploitation dilemma.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-28T03:53:14Z)
• Towards Sample-Efficiency and Generalization of Transfer and Inverse Reinforcement Learning: A Comprehensive Literature Review [50.67937325077047]
  This paper is devoted to a comprehensive review of realizing the sample efficiency and generalization of RL algorithms through transfer and inverse reinforcement learning (T-IRL) Our findings denote that a majority of recent research works have dealt with the aforementioned challenges by utilizing human-in-the-loop and sim-to-real strategies. Under the IRL structure, training schemes that require a low number of experience transitions and extension of such frameworks to multi-agent and multi-intention problems have been the priority of researchers in recent years.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-15T15:18:57Z)
• Where Do We Stand with Implicit Neural Representations? A Technical and Performance Survey [16.89460694470542]
  Implicit Neural Representations (INRs) have emerged as a paradigm in knowledge representation. INRs leverage multilayer perceptrons (MLPs) to model data as continuous implicit functions. This survey introduces a clear taxonomy that categorises them into four key areas: activation functions, position encoding, combined strategies, and network structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T06:14:24Z)
• StructRAG: Boosting Knowledge Intensive Reasoning of LLMs via Inference-time Hybrid Information Structurization [94.31508613367296]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is a key means to effectively enhance large language models (LLMs) We propose StructRAG, which can identify the optimal structure type for the task at hand, reconstruct original documents into this structured format, and infer answers based on the resulting structure. Experiments show that StructRAG achieves state-of-the-art performance, particularly excelling in challenging scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T13:52:44Z)
• Is Value Functions Estimation with Classification Plug-and-play for Offline Reinforcement Learning? [1.9116784879310031]
  In deep Reinforcement Learning (RL), value functions are approximated using deep neural networks and trained via mean squared error regression objectives. Recent research has proposed an alternative approach, utilizing the cross-entropy classification objective. Our work seeks to empirically investigate the impact of such a replacement in an offline RL setup.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T14:25:11Z)
• Safe and Robust Reinforcement Learning: Principles and Practice [0.0]
  Reinforcement Learning has shown remarkable success in solving relatively complex tasks. The deployment of RL systems in real-world scenarios poses significant challenges related to safety and robustness. This paper explores the main dimensions of the safe and robust RL landscape, encompassing algorithmic, ethical, and practical considerations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-27T13:14:29Z)
• Large Language Models for Forecasting and Anomaly Detection: A Systematic Literature Review [10.325003320290547]
  This systematic literature review comprehensively examines the application of Large Language Models (LLMs) in forecasting and anomaly detection. LLMs have demonstrated significant potential in parsing and analyzing extensive datasets to identify patterns, predict future events, and detect anomalous behavior across various domains. This review identifies several critical challenges that impede their broader adoption and effectiveness, including the reliance on vast historical datasets, issues with generalizability across different contexts, and the phenomenon of model hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T22:43:02Z)
• The Efficiency Spectrum of Large Language Models: An Algorithmic Survey [54.19942426544731]
  The rapid growth of Large Language Models (LLMs) has been a driving force in transforming various domains. This paper examines the multi-faceted dimensions of efficiency essential for the end-to-end algorithmic development of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-01T16:00:25Z)
• Latent Variable Representation for Reinforcement Learning [131.03944557979725]
  It remains unclear theoretically and empirically how latent variable models may facilitate learning, planning, and exploration to improve the sample efficiency of model-based reinforcement learning. We provide a representation view of the latent variable models for state-action value functions, which allows both tractable variational learning algorithm and effective implementation of the optimism/pessimism principle. In particular, we propose a computationally efficient planning algorithm with UCB exploration by incorporating kernel embeddings of latent variable models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-17T00:26:31Z)
• Offline Reinforcement Learning with Differentiable Function Approximation is Provably Efficient [65.08966446962845]
  offline reinforcement learning, which aims at optimizing decision-making strategies with historical data, has been extensively applied in real-life applications. We take a step by considering offline reinforcement learning with differentiable function class approximation (DFA) Most importantly, we show offline differentiable function approximation is provably efficient by analyzing the pessimistic fitted Q-learning algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-03T07:59:42Z)
• Improved Context-Based Offline Meta-RL with Attention and Contrastive Learning [1.3106063755117399]
  We improve upon one of the SOTA OMRL algorithms, FOCAL, by incorporating intra-task attention mechanism and inter-task contrastive learning objectives. Theoretical analysis and experiments are presented to demonstrate the superior performance, efficiency and robustness of our end-to-end and model free method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-22T05:05:16Z)
• Reinforcement Learning as Iterative and Amortised Inference [62.997667081978825]
  We use the control as inference framework to outline a novel classification scheme based on amortised and iterative inference. We show that taking this perspective allows us to identify parts of the algorithmic design space which have been relatively unexplored.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-13T16:10:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.