Filter Bubbles in Recommender Systems: Fact or Fallacy -- A Systematic Review

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.01221v1
• Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2023 13:41:42 GMT
• Title: Filter Bubbles in Recommender Systems: Fact or Fallacy -- A Systematic Review
• Authors: Qazi Mohammad Areeb, Mohammad Nadeem, Shahab Saquib Sohail, Raza Imam, Faiyaz Doctor, Yassine Himeur, Amir Hussain and Abbes Amira
• Abstract summary: A filter bubble refers to the phenomenon where Internet customization effectively isolates individuals from diverse opinions or materials. We conduct a systematic literature review on the topic of filter bubbles in recommender systems. We propose mechanisms to mitigate the impact of filter bubbles and demonstrate that incorporating diversity into recommendations can potentially help alleviate this issue.
• Score: 7.121051191777698
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: A filter bubble refers to the phenomenon where Internet customization effectively isolates individuals from diverse opinions or materials, resulting in their exposure to only a select set of content. This can lead to the reinforcement of existing attitudes, beliefs, or conditions. In this study, our primary focus is to investigate the impact of filter bubbles in recommender systems. This pioneering research aims to uncover the reasons behind this problem, explore potential solutions, and propose an integrated tool to help users avoid filter bubbles in recommender systems. To achieve this objective, we conduct a systematic literature review on the topic of filter bubbles in recommender systems. The reviewed articles are carefully analyzed and classified, providing valuable insights that inform the development of an integrated approach. Notably, our review reveals evidence of filter bubbles in recommendation systems, highlighting several biases that contribute to their existence. Moreover, we propose mechanisms to mitigate the impact of filter bubbles and demonstrate that incorporating diversity into recommendations can potentially help alleviate this issue. The findings of this timely review will serve as a benchmark for researchers working in interdisciplinary fields such as privacy, artificial intelligence ethics, and recommendation systems. Furthermore, it will open new avenues for future research in related domains, prompting further exploration and advancement in this critical area.

Related papers

• Source Echo Chamber: Exploring the Escalation of Source Bias in User, Data, and Recommender System Feedback Loop [65.23044868332693]
  We investigate the impact of source bias on the realm of recommender systems. We show the prevalence of source bias and reveal a potential digital echo chamber with source bias amplification. We introduce a black-box debiasing method that maintains model impartiality towards both HGC and AIGC.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T09:34:50Z)
• Uncovering the Deep Filter Bubble: Narrow Exposure in Short-Video Recommendation [30.395376392259497]
  Filter bubbles have been studied extensively within the context of online content platforms. With the rise of short-video platforms, the filter bubble has been given extra attention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-07T14:14:40Z)
• Incentivized Exploration via Filtered Posterior Sampling [51.32577788466152]
  We study "incentivized exploration" (IE) in social learning problems where the principal can leverage information asymmetry to incentivize agents to take exploratory actions. We identify posterior sampling, an algorithmic approach that is well known in the multi-armed bandits literature, as a general-purpose solution for IE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T19:30:55Z)
• Impression-Aware Recommender Systems [57.38537491535016]
  Novel data sources bring new opportunities to improve the quality of recommender systems. Researchers may use impressions to refine user preferences and overcome the current limitations in recommender systems research. We present a systematic literature review on recommender systems using impressions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-15T16:16:02Z)
• BHEISR: Nudging from Bias to Balance -- Promoting Belief Harmony by Eliminating Ideological Segregation in Knowledge-based Recommendations [5.795636579831129]
  The main objective is to strike a belief balance for users while minimizing the detrimental influence caused by filter bubbles. The BHEISR model amalgamates principles from nudge theory while upholding democratic and transparent principles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-06T06:12:37Z)
• Mitigating Filter Bubbles within Deep Recommender Systems [2.3590112541068575]
  recommender systems have been known to intellectually isolate users from a variety of perspectives, or cause filter bubbles. We characterize and mitigate this filter bubble effect by classifying various datapoints based on their user-item interaction history. We mitigate this filter bubble effect without compromising accuracy by carefully retraining our recommender system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-16T22:00:10Z)
• Fairness in Recommender Systems: Research Landscape and Future Directions [119.67643184567623]
  We review the concepts and notions of fairness that were put forward in the area in the recent past. We present an overview of how research in this field is currently operationalized. Overall, our analysis of recent works points to certain research gaps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T08:34:25Z)
• A Review on Pushing the Limits of Baseline Recommendation Systems with the integration of Opinion Mining & Information Retrieval Techniques [0.0]
  Recommendation Systems allow users to identify trending items among a community while being timely and relevant to the user's expectations. Deep Learning methods have been brought forward to achieve better quality recommendations. Researchers have tried to expand on the capabilities of standard recommendation systems to provide the most effective recommendations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-03T22:13:33Z)
• PURS: Personalized Unexpected Recommender System for Improving User Satisfaction [76.98616102965023]
  We describe a novel Personalized Unexpected Recommender System (PURS) model that incorporates unexpectedness into the recommendation process. Extensive offline experiments on three real-world datasets illustrate that the proposed PURS model significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art baseline approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-05T01:33:21Z)
• Echo Chambers in Collaborative Filtering Based Recommendation Systems [1.5140493624413542]
  We simulate the recommendations given by collaborative filtering algorithms on users in the MovieLens data set. We find that prolonged exposure to system-generated recommendations substantially decreases content diversity. Our work suggests that once these echo-chambers have been established, it is difficult for an individual user to break out by manipulating solely their own rating vector.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-08T02:35:47Z)
• A Survey on Knowledge Graph-Based Recommender Systems [65.50486149662564]
  We conduct a systematical survey of knowledge graph-based recommender systems. We focus on how the papers utilize the knowledge graph for accurate and explainable recommendation. We introduce datasets used in these works.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-28T02:26:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.