The measurement postulates of quantum mechanics are not redundant

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.06191v1
• Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 14:30:36 GMT
• Title: The measurement postulates of quantum mechanics are not redundant
• Authors: Adrian Kent (Centre for Quantum Information and Foundations, DAMTP, University of Cambridge and Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics)
• Abstract summary: Masanes, Galley and M"uller argue that the measurement postulates of non-relativistic quantum mechanics follow from the structural postulates. We refute their conclusion, giving explicit examples of non-quantum measurement and state update rules.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Masanes, Galley and M\"uller [1] argue that the measurement postulates of non-relativistic quantum mechanics follow from the structural postulates together with an assumption they call the "possibility of state estimation". Their argument also relies on what they term a "theory-independent characterization of measurements for single and multipartite systems". We refute their conclusion, giving explicit examples of non-quantum measurement and state update rules that satisfy all their assumptions. We also show that their "possibility of state estimation" assumption is neither necessary nor sufficient to ensure a sensible notion of state estimation within a theory whose states are described by the quantum formalism. We further show their purportedly "theory-independent" characterization assumes several properties of quantum measurements that exclude plausible alternative types of measurement. We illustrate all these points with specific alternative measurement postulates and post-measurement state update rules. We conclude that, contrary to some folklore, quantum mechanics is by no means an island in theory-space. It can consistently be extended by rules for obtaining information about quantum states other than via POVMs. Whether such rules are realised in nature, for example in linking quantum theory and gravity, is an empirical question that cannot be resolved by theoretical analysis alone.

Related papers

• What is "quantum" about quantum gravity? [0.0]
  We argue that if both the equivalence principle and quantum mechanics continue to survive experimental tests, that this favors epistemic'' interpretations of quantum mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-13T21:19:50Z)
• How quantum mechanics requires non-additive measures [0.0]
  Measure theory is used in physics, not just to capture classical probability, but also to quantify the number of states. We construct the quantum equivalent of the Liouville measure, which is non-additive and has a unitary lower bound. We show these preliminary results and outline a new line of inquiry that may provide a different insight into the foundations of quantum theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T14:46:55Z)
• Response to "The measurement postulates of quantum mechanics are not redundant" [0.0]
  We prove that each of these theories contains pure states which are not rays of the Hilbert space. We also prove that these alternatives violate the finite-dimensionality of mixed states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-04T15:03:50Z)
• A Quantum Theory with Non-collapsing Measurements [0.0]
  A collapse-free version of quantum theory is introduced to study the role of the projection postulate. We assume "passive" measurements that do not update quantum states while measurement outcomes still occur probabilistically. The resulting quantum-like theory has only one type of dynamics, namely unitary evolution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-23T16:32:29Z)
• Experimental demonstration of optimal unambiguous two-out-of-four quantum state elimination [52.77024349608834]
  A core principle of quantum theory is that non-orthogonal quantum states cannot be perfectly distinguished with single-shot measurements. Here we implement a quantum state elimination measurement which unambiguously rules out two of four pure, non-orthogonal quantum states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T18:00:01Z)
• Quantum state inference from coarse-grained descriptions: analysis and an application to quantum thermodynamics [101.18253437732933]
  We compare the Maximum Entropy Principle method, with the recently proposed Average Assignment Map method. Despite the fact that the assigned descriptions respect the measured constraints, the descriptions differ in scenarios that go beyond the traditional system-environment structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-16T19:42:24Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
• Gentle Measurement as a Principle of Quantum Theory [9.137554315375919]
  We propose the gentle measurement principle (GMP) as one of the principles at the foundation of quantum mechanics. We show, within the framework of general probabilistic theories, that GMP imposes strong restrictions on the law of physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-28T11:59:49Z)
• Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
  We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world. We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z)
• Operational Resource Theory of Imaginarity [48.7576911714538]
  We show that quantum states are easier to create and manipulate if they only have real elements. As an application, we show that imaginarity plays a crucial role for state discrimination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-29T14:03:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.