Response to "The measurement postulates of quantum mechanics are not redundant"

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.01650v2
• Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 10:01:54 GMT
• Title: Response to "The measurement postulates of quantum mechanics are not redundant"
• Authors: Lluís Masanes, Thomas D. Galley, Markus P. Müller,
• Abstract summary: We prove that each of these theories contains pure states which are not rays of the Hilbert space. We also prove that these alternatives violate the finite-dimensionality of mixed states.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Adrian Kent has recently presented a critique [arXiv:2307.06191] of our paper [Nat. Comms. 10, 1361 (2019)] in which he claims to refute our main result: the measurement postulates of quantum mechanics can be derived from the rest of postulates, once we assume that the set of mixed states of a finite-dimensional Hilbert space is finite-dimensional. To construct his argument, Kent considers theories resulting from supplementing quantum mechanics with hypothetical "post-quantum" measurement devices. We prove that each of these theories contains pure states (i.e. states of maximal knowledge) which are not rays of the Hilbert space, in contradiction with the "pure state postulate" of quantum mechanics. We also prove that these alternatives violate the finite-dimensionality of mixed states. Each of these two facts separately invalidates the refutation. In this note we also clarify the assumptions used in [Nat. Comms. 10, 1361 (2019)] and discuss the notions of pure state, physical system, and the sensitivity of the structure of the state space under modifications of the measurements or the dynamics.

Related papers

• A computational test of quantum contextuality, and even simpler proofs of quantumness [43.25018099464869]
  We show that an arbitrary contextuality game can be compiled into an operational "test of contextuality" involving a single quantum device. Our work can be seen as using cryptography to enforce spatial separation within subsystems of a single quantum device.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T19:30:23Z)
• Causality and a possible interpretation of quantum mechanics [2.7398542529968477]
  Based on quantum field theory, our work provides a framework that harmoniously integrates relativistic causality, quantum non-locality, and quantum measurement. We use reduced density matrices to represent the local information of the quantum state and show that the reduced density matrices cannot evolve superluminally. Unlike recent approaches that focus on causality by introducing new operators to describe detectors, we consider that everything--including detectors, environments, and humans--is composed of the same fundamental fields.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T07:07:22Z)
• Two Results in the Quantum Theory of Measurements [44.99833362998488]
  The first one clarifies and amends von Neumann's Measurement Postulate used in the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. The second one clarifies the relationship between events'' and measurements'' and the meaning of measurements in the $ETH$-Approach to quantum mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-01T14:05:04Z)
• The measurement postulates of quantum mechanics are not redundant [0.0]
  Masanes, Galley and M"uller argue that the measurement postulates of non-relativistic quantum mechanics follow from the structural postulates. We refute their conclusion, giving explicit examples of non-quantum measurement and state update rules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-12T14:30:36Z)
• A theory of quantum (statistical) measurement [0.0]
  We propose a theory of quantum (statistical) measurement which is close, in spirit, to Hepp's theory. We make a three-fold assumption: the measurement is not instantaneous, it lasts a finite amount of time and is, up to arbitrary accuracy, performed in a finite region of space. The fact that no irreversibility is attached to the process of measurement is shown to follow from the author's theory of irreversibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-25T16:56:37Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
• The Time-Evolution of States in Quantum Mechanics [77.34726150561087]
  It is argued that the Schr"odinger equation does not yield a correct description of the quantum-mechanical time evolution of states of isolated (open) systems featuring events. A precise general law for the time evolution of states replacing the Schr"odinger equation is formulated within the so-called ETH-Approach to Quantum Mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-04T16:09:10Z)
• Operational Resource Theory of Imaginarity [48.7576911714538]
  We show that quantum states are easier to create and manipulate if they only have real elements. As an application, we show that imaginarity plays a crucial role for state discrimination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-29T14:03:38Z)
• Measuring Quantum Superpositions (Or, "It is only the theory which decides what can be observed.") [0.0]
  We argue that the ad hoc introduction of the projection postulate (or measurement rule) can be understood as a necessary requirement coming from a naive empiricist standpoint. We discuss the general physical conditions for measuring and observing quantum superpositions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-02T14:30:56Z)
• Quantum Mechanical description of Bell's experiment assumes Locality [91.3755431537592]
  Bell's experiment description assumes the (Quantum Mechanics-language equivalent of the classical) condition of Locality. This result is complementary to a recently published one demonstrating that non-Locality is necessary to describe said experiment. It is concluded that, within the framework of Quantum Mechanics, there is absolutely no reason to believe in the existence of non-Local effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-27T15:04:08Z)
• The (Quantum) Measurement Problem in Classical Mechanics [0.0]
  We show why this is not an "obvious" nor "self evident" problem for the theory of quanta. We discuss a representational realist account of both physical 'theories' and'measurement' We show how through these same set of presuppositions it is easy to derive a completely analogous paradox for the case of classical mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-01T17:07:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.