CONTRACTFIX: A Framework for Automatically Fixing Vulnerabilities in Smart Contracts

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.08912v2
• Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2023 19:48:39 GMT
• Title: CONTRACTFIX: A Framework for Automatically Fixing Vulnerabilities in Smart Contracts
• Authors: Pengcheng and Peng and Yun and Qingzhao and Tao and Dawn and Prateek and Sanjeev and Zhuotao and Xusheng
• Abstract summary: ContractFix is a framework that automatically generates security patches for vulnerable smart contracts. Users can use it as a security fix-it tool that automatically applies patches and verifies the patched contracts.
• Score: 12.68736241704817
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The increased adoption of smart contracts in many industries has made them an attractive target for cybercriminals, leading to millions of dollars in losses. Thus, deploying smart contracts with detected vulnerabilities (known to developers) are not acceptable, and fixing all the detected vulnerabilities is needed, which incurs high manual labor cost without effective tool support. To fill this need, in this paper, we propose ContractFix, a novel framework that automatically generates security patches for vulnerable smart contracts. ContractFix is a general framework that can incorporate different fix patterns for different types of vulnerabilities. Users can use it as a security fix-it tool that automatically applies patches and verifies the patched contracts before deploying the contracts. To address the unique challenges in fixing smart contract vulnerabilities, given an input smart contract, \tool conducts our proposed ensemble identification based on multiple static verification tools to identify vulnerabilities that are amenable for automatic fix. Then, ContractFix generates patches using template-based fix patterns and conducts program analysis (program dependency computation and pointer analysis) for smart contracts to accurately infer and populate the parameter values for the fix patterns. Finally, ContractFix performs static verification that guarantees the patched contract is free of vulnerabilities. Our evaluations on $144$ real vulnerable contracts demonstrate that \tool can successfully fix $94\%$ of the detected vulnerabilities ($565$ out of $601$) and preserve the expected behaviors of the smart contracts.

Related papers

• ContractTinker: LLM-Empowered Vulnerability Repair for Real-World Smart Contracts [8.756175353426304]
  Smart contracts are susceptible to being exploited by attackers, especially when facing real-world vulnerabilities. To mitigate this risk, developers often rely on third-party audit services to identify potential vulnerabilities before project deployment. Existing pattern-based repair tools mostly fail to address real-world vulnerabilities due to their lack of high-level semantic understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-15T08:24:01Z)
• On the Resilience of Multi-Agent Systems with Malicious Agents [58.79302663733702]
  This paper investigates what is the resilience of multi-agent system structures under malicious agents. We devise two methods, AutoTransform and AutoInject, to transform any agent into a malicious one. We show that two defense methods, introducing a mechanism for each agent to challenge others' outputs, or an additional agent to review and correct messages, can enhance system resilience.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T03:25:20Z)
• Versioned Analysis of Software Quality Indicators and Self-admitted Technical Debt in Ethereum Smart Contracts with Ethstractor [2.052808596154225]
  This paper proposes Ethstractor, the first smart contract collection tool for gathering a dataset of versioned smart contracts. The collected dataset is then used to evaluate the reliability of code metrics as indicators of vulnerabilities in smart contracts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-22T18:27:29Z)
• Uncover the Premeditated Attacks: Detecting Exploitable Reentrancy Vulnerabilities by Identifying Attacker Contracts [27.242299425486273]
  Reentrancy, a notorious vulnerability in smart contracts, has led to millions of dollars in financial loss. Current smart contract vulnerability detection tools suffer from a high false positive rate in identifying contracts with reentrancy vulnerabilities. We propose BlockWatchdog, a tool that focuses on detecting reentrancy vulnerabilities by identifying attacker contracts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T03:07:23Z)
• HasTEE+ : Confidential Cloud Computing and Analytics with Haskell [50.994023665559496]
  Confidential computing enables the protection of confidential code and data in a co-tenanted cloud deployment using specialized hardware isolation units called Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) TEEs offer low-level C/C++-based toolchains that are susceptible to inherent memory safety vulnerabilities and lack language constructs to monitor explicit and implicit information-flow leaks. We address the above with HasTEE+, a domain-specific language (cla) embedded in Haskell that enables programming TEEs in a high-level language with strong type-safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-17T00:56:23Z)
• Vulnerability Scanners for Ethereum Smart Contracts: A Large-Scale Study [44.25093111430751]
  In 2023 alone, such vulnerabilities led to substantial financial losses exceeding a billion of US dollars. Various tools have been developed to detect and mitigate vulnerabilities in smart contracts. This study investigates the gap between the effectiveness of existing security scanners and the vulnerabilities that still persist in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-27T11:26:26Z)
• Survey on Quality Assurance of Smart Contracts [14.34073444030935]
  With the increasing adoption of smart contracts, ensuring their security has become a critical concern. We present a systematic overview of the quality assurance of smart contracts, covering vulnerabilities, attacks, defenses, and tool support. In order to effectively protect smart contracts, we have created a labeled dataset to evaluate various vulnerability detection tools and compare their effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-01T03:36:24Z)
• Two Timin': Repairing Smart Contracts With A Two-Layered Approach [3.2154249558826846]
  This paper proposes a novel, two-layered framework for classifying and repairing smart contracts. Slither's vulnerability report is combined with source code and passed through a pre-trained RandomForestClassifier (RFC) and Large Language Models (LLMs) Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of fine-tuned and prompt-engineered LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-14T16:37:23Z)
• Formally Verifying a Real World Smart Contract [52.30656867727018]
  We search for a tool capable of formally verifying a real-world smart contract written in a recent version of Solidity. In this article, we present our search for a tool capable of formally verifying a real-world smart contract written in a recent version of Solidity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-05T14:30:21Z)
• Sample-Efficient Safety Assurances using Conformal Prediction [57.92013073974406]
  Early warning systems can provide alerts when an unsafe situation is imminent. To reliably improve safety, these warning systems should have a provable false negative rate. We present a framework that combines a statistical inference technique known as conformal prediction with a simulator of robot/environment dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-28T23:00:30Z)
• ESCORT: Ethereum Smart COntRacTs Vulnerability Detection using Deep Neural Network and Transfer Learning [80.85273827468063]
  Existing machine learning-based vulnerability detection methods are limited and only inspect whether the smart contract is vulnerable. We propose ESCORT, the first Deep Neural Network (DNN)-based vulnerability detection framework for smart contracts. We show that ESCORT achieves an average F1-score of 95% on six vulnerability types and the detection time is 0.02 seconds per contract.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-23T15:04:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.