Challenges and Solutions in AI for All
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.10600v1
- Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 05:43:39 GMT
- Title: Challenges and Solutions in AI for All
- Authors: Rifat Ara Shams, Didar Zowghi, Muneera Bano
- Abstract summary: We conducted a Systematic Review to unearth challenges and solutions relating to diversity and inclusivity in AI.
Our rigorous search yielded 48 research articles published between 2017 and 2022.
Open coding of these papers revealed 55 unique challenges and 33 solutions for D&I in AI, as well as 24 unique challenges and 23 solutions for enhancing such practices using AI.
- Score: 6.305950347749111
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Artificial Intelligence (AI)'s pervasive presence and variety necessitate
diversity and inclusivity (D&I) principles in its design for fairness, trust,
and transparency. Yet, these considerations are often overlooked, leading to
issues of bias, discrimination, and perceived untrustworthiness. In response,
we conducted a Systematic Review to unearth challenges and solutions relating
to D&I in AI. Our rigorous search yielded 48 research articles published
between 2017 and 2022. Open coding of these papers revealed 55 unique
challenges and 33 solutions for D&I in AI, as well as 24 unique challenges and
23 solutions for enhancing such practices using AI. This study, by offering a
deeper understanding of these issues, will enlighten researchers and
practitioners seeking to integrate these principles into future AI systems.
Related papers
- OlympicArena: Benchmarking Multi-discipline Cognitive Reasoning for Superintelligent AI [73.75520820608232]
We introduce OlympicArena, which includes 11,163 bilingual problems across both text-only and interleaved text-image modalities.
These challenges encompass a wide range of disciplines spanning seven fields and 62 international Olympic competitions, rigorously examined for data leakage.
Our evaluations reveal that even advanced models like GPT-4o only achieve a 39.97% overall accuracy, illustrating current AI limitations in complex reasoning and multimodal integration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-18T16:20:53Z) - Responsible AI: Portraits with Intelligent Bibliometrics [30.51687434548628]
This study defined responsible AI and identified its core principles.
Empirically, this study investigated 17,799 research articles contributed by the AI community since 2015.
An analysis of a core cohort comprising 380 articles from multiple disciplines captures the most recent advancements in responsible AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-05T08:40:22Z) - Ten Hard Problems in Artificial Intelligence We Must Get Right [72.99597122935903]
We explore the AI2050 "hard problems" that block the promise of AI and cause AI risks.
For each problem, we outline the area, identify significant recent work, and suggest ways forward.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-06T23:16:41Z) - Responsible AI Governance: A Systematic Literature Review [8.318630741859113]
This paper aims to examine the existing literature on AI Governance.
The focus of this study is to analyse the literature to answer key questions: WHO is accountable for AI systems' governance, WHAT elements are being governed, WHEN governance occurs within the AI development life cycle, and HOW it is executed through various mechanisms like frameworks, tools, standards, policies, or models.
The findings of this study provides a foundational basis for future research and development of comprehensive governance models that align with RAI principles.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-18T05:22:36Z) - Predictable Artificial Intelligence [67.79118050651908]
We argue that achieving predictability is crucial for fostering trust, liability, control, alignment and safety of AI ecosystems.
This paper aims to elucidate the questions, hypotheses and challenges relevant to Predictable AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-09T21:36:21Z) - Ethics in the Age of AI: An Analysis of AI Practitioners' Awareness and
Challenges [11.656193349991609]
We conducted a survey aimed at understanding AI practitioners' awareness of AI ethics and their challenges in incorporating ethics.
Based on 100 AI practitioners' responses, our findings indicate that majority of AI practitioners had a reasonable familiarity with the concept of AI ethics.
Formal education/training was considered somewhat helpful in preparing practitioners to incorporate AI ethics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-14T02:50:46Z) - Inherent Limitations of AI Fairness [16.588468396705366]
The study of AI fairness has rapidly developed into a rich field of research with links to computer science, social science, law, and philosophy.
Many technical solutions for measuring and achieving AI fairness have been proposed, yet their approach has been criticized in recent years for being misleading, unrealistic and harmful.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-13T11:23:24Z) - AI Ethics: An Empirical Study on the Views of Practitioners and
Lawmakers [8.82540441326446]
Transparency, accountability, and privacy are the most critical AI ethics principles.
Lack of ethical knowledge, no legal frameworks, and lacking monitoring bodies are the most common AI ethics challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-30T17:24:29Z) - Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary
Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them.
We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives.
We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z) - Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective [54.80482955088197]
We focus on six of the most crucial dimensions in achieving trustworthy AI: (i) Safety & Robustness, (ii) Non-discrimination & Fairness, (iii) Explainability, (iv) Privacy, (v) Accountability & Auditability, and (vi) Environmental Well-Being.
For each dimension, we review the recent related technologies according to a taxonomy and summarize their applications in real-world systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-12T14:21:46Z) - Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society.
A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests.
This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.