Who benefits from altmetrics? The effect of team gender composition on the link between online visibility and citation impact

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.00405v1
• Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 09:33:31 GMT
• Title: Who benefits from altmetrics? The effect of team gender composition on the link between online visibility and citation impact
• Authors: Orsolya V\'as\'arhelyi and Em\H{o}ke-\'Agnes Horv\'at
• Abstract summary: Women's articles receive fewer academic citations than men's. Online visibility positively affects citations across research areas. Team gender composition interacts differently with visibility in these research areas.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
• Abstract: Online science dissemination has quickly become crucial in promoting scholars' work. Recent literature has demonstrated a lack of visibility for women's research, where women's articles receive fewer academic citations than men's. The informetric and scientometric community has briefly examined gender-based inequalities in online visibility. However, the link between online sharing of scientific work and citation impact for teams with different gender compositions remains understudied. Here we explore whether online visibility is helping women overcome the gender-based citation penalty. Our analyses cover the three broad research areas of Computer Science, Engineering, and Social Sciences, which have different gender representation, adoption of online science dissemination practices, and citation culture. We create a quasi-experimental setting by applying Coarsened Exact Matching, which enables us to isolate the effects of team gender composition and online visibility on the number of citations. We find that online visibility positively affects citations across research areas, while team gender composition interacts differently with visibility in these research areas. Our results provide essential insights into gendered citation patterns and online visibility, inviting informed discussions about decreasing the citation gap.

Related papers

• Divided by discipline? A systematic literature review on the quantification of online sexism and misogyny using a semi-automated approach [1.1599570446840546]
  We present a semi-automated way to narrow down the search results in the different phases of selection stage in the PRISMA flowchart. We examine literature from computer science and the social sciences from 2012 to 2022. We discuss the challenges and opportunities for future research dedicated to measuring online sexism and misogyny.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-30T11:34:39Z)
• Biases in gendered citation practices: an exploratory study and some reflections on the Matthew and Matilda effects [2.0277446818410994]
  This paper aims at analyzing gendered citation practices in the software engineering literature. Our results show that some efforts still need to be done to achieve fairness in citation practices in the SE field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-18T19:53:41Z)
• Inclusivity in Large Language Models: Personality Traits and Gender Bias in Scientific Abstracts [49.97673761305336]
  We evaluate three large language models (LLMs) for their alignment with human narrative styles and potential gender biases. Our findings indicate that, while these models generally produce text closely resembling human authored content, variations in stylistic features suggest significant gender biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T19:26:11Z)
• A multitask learning framework for leveraging subjectivity of annotators to identify misogyny [47.175010006458436]
  We propose a multitask learning approach to enhance the performance of the misogyny identification systems. We incorporated diverse perspectives from annotators in our model design, considering gender and age across six profile groups. This research advances content moderation and highlights the importance of embracing diverse perspectives to build effective online moderation systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-22T15:06:08Z)
• Unveiling Gender Bias in Terms of Profession Across LLMs: Analyzing and Addressing Sociological Implications [0.0]
  The study examines existing research on gender bias in AI language models and identifies gaps in the current knowledge. The findings shed light on gendered word associations, language usage, and biased narratives present in the outputs of Large Language Models. The paper presents strategies for reducing gender bias in LLMs, including algorithmic approaches and data augmentation techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-18T11:38:45Z)
• "I'm fully who I am": Towards Centering Transgender and Non-Binary Voices to Measure Biases in Open Language Generation [69.25368160338043]
  Transgender and non-binary (TGNB) individuals disproportionately experience discrimination and exclusion from daily life. We assess how the social reality surrounding experienced marginalization of TGNB persons contributes to and persists within Open Language Generation. We introduce TANGO, a dataset of template-based real-world text curated from a TGNB-oriented community.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-17T04:21:45Z)
• Towards Understanding Gender-Seniority Compound Bias in Natural Language Generation [64.65911758042914]
  We investigate how seniority impacts the degree of gender bias exhibited in pretrained neural generation models. Our results show that GPT-2 amplifies bias by considering women as junior and men as senior more often than the ground truth in both domains. These results suggest that NLP applications built using GPT-2 may harm women in professional capacities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-19T20:05:02Z)
• Investigating writing style as a contributor to gender gaps in science and technology [0.0]
  We find significant differences in writing style by gender, with women using more involved features in their writing. Papers and patents with more involved features also tend to be cited more by women. Our findings suggest that scientific text is not devoid of personal character, which could contribute to bias in evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-28T22:33:36Z)
• Assessing Gender Bias in the Information Systems Field: An Analysis of the Impact on Citations [0.0]
  This paper outlines a study to estimate the impact of scholarly citations that female IS academics accumulate vis-a-vis their male colleagues. By doing so we propose to contribute knowledge on a core dimension of gender bias in academia, which is, so far, almost completely unexplored in the IS field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-22T18:18:52Z)
• Gender bias in magazines oriented to men and women: a computational approach [58.720142291102135]
  We compare the content of a women-oriented magazine with that of a men-oriented one, both produced by the same editorial group over a decade. With Topic Modelling techniques we identify the main themes discussed in the magazines and quantify how much the presence of these topics differs between magazines over time. Our results show that the frequency of appearance of the topics Family, Business and Women as sex objects, present an initial bias that tends to disappear over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-24T14:02:49Z)
• Gender Stereotype Reinforcement: Measuring the Gender Bias Conveyed by Ranking Algorithms [68.85295025020942]
  We propose the Gender Stereotype Reinforcement (GSR) measure, which quantifies the tendency of a Search Engines to support gender stereotypes. GSR is the first specifically tailored measure for Information Retrieval, capable of quantifying representational harms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-02T20:45:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.