The Hard-Constraint PINNs for Interface Optimal Control Problems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.06709v2
• Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 04:24:55 GMT
• Title: The Hard-Constraint PINNs for Interface Optimal Control Problems
• Authors: Ming-Chih Lai, Yongcun Song, Xiaoming Yuan, Hangrui Yue, Tianyou Zeng,
• Abstract summary: We show that PINNs can be applied to solve optimal control problems with interfaces and some control constraints. The resulting algorithm is mesh-free and scalable to different PDEs.
• Score: 1.6237916898865998
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We show that the physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), in combination with some recently developed discontinuity capturing neural networks, can be applied to solve optimal control problems subject to partial differential equations (PDEs) with interfaces and some control constraints. The resulting algorithm is mesh-free and scalable to different PDEs, and it ensures the control constraints rigorously. Since the boundary and interface conditions, as well as the PDEs, are all treated as soft constraints by lumping them into a weighted loss function, it is necessary to learn them simultaneously and there is no guarantee that the boundary and interface conditions can be satisfied exactly. This immediately causes difficulties in tuning the weights in the corresponding loss function and training the neural networks. To tackle these difficulties and guarantee the numerical accuracy, we propose to impose the boundary and interface conditions as hard constraints in PINNs by developing a novel neural network architecture. The resulting hard-constraint PINNs approach guarantees that both the boundary and interface conditions can be satisfied exactly or with a high degree of accuracy, and they are decoupled from the learning of the PDEs. Its efficiency is promisingly validated by some elliptic and parabolic interface optimal control problems.

Related papers

• On the Boundary Feasibility for PDE Control with Neural Operators [7.537923263907072]
  We introduce a general neural boundary control barrier function (BCBF) to ensure the feasibility of the trajectorywise constraint satisfaction of boundary output. Based on a neural operator modeling the transfer function from boundary control input to output trajectories, we show that the change in the BCBF depends linearly on the change in input boundary. Experiments under challenging hyperbolic, parabolic and Navier-Stokes PDE dynamics environments validate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-23T20:15:51Z)
• Scaling physics-informed hard constraints with mixture-of-experts [0.0]
  We develop a scalable approach to enforce hard physical constraints using Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) MoE imposes the constraint over smaller domains, each of which is solved by an "expert" through differentiable optimization. Compared to standard differentiable optimization, our scalable approach achieves greater accuracy in the neural PDE solver setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T22:45:00Z)
• Neural Fields with Hard Constraints of Arbitrary Differential Order [61.49418682745144]
  We develop a series of approaches for enforcing hard constraints on neural fields. The constraints can be specified as a linear operator applied to the neural field and its derivatives. Our approaches are demonstrated in a wide range of real-world applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T08:33:52Z)
• Tunable Complexity Benchmarks for Evaluating Physics-Informed Neural Networks on Coupled Ordinary Differential Equations [64.78260098263489]
  In this work, we assess the ability of physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) to solve increasingly-complex coupled ordinary differential equations (ODEs) We show that PINNs eventually fail to produce correct solutions to these benchmarks as their complexity increases. We identify several reasons why this may be the case, including insufficient network capacity, poor conditioning of the ODEs, and high local curvature, as measured by the Laplacian of the PINN loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T15:01:32Z)
• Learning differentiable solvers for systems with hard constraints [48.54197776363251]
  We introduce a practical method to enforce partial differential equation (PDE) constraints for functions defined by neural networks (NNs) We develop a differentiable PDE-constrained layer that can be incorporated into any NN architecture. Our results show that incorporating hard constraints directly into the NN architecture achieves much lower test error when compared to training on an unconstrained objective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-18T15:11:43Z)
• Mitigating Learning Complexity in Physics and Equality Constrained Artificial Neural Networks [0.9137554315375919]
  Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have been proposed to learn the solution of partial differential equations (PDE) In PINNs, the residual form of the PDE of interest and its boundary conditions are lumped into a composite objective function as soft penalties. Here, we show that this specific way of formulating the objective function is the source of severe limitations in the PINN approach when applied to different kinds of PDEs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-19T04:12:01Z)
• Auto-PINN: Understanding and Optimizing Physics-Informed Neural Architecture [77.59766598165551]
  Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are revolutionizing science and engineering practice by bringing together the power of deep learning to bear on scientific computation. Here, we propose Auto-PINN, which employs Neural Architecture Search (NAS) techniques to PINN design. A comprehensive set of pre-experiments using standard PDE benchmarks allows us to probe the structure-performance relationship in PINNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-27T03:24:31Z)
• Lagrangian PINNs: A causality-conforming solution to failure modes of physics-informed neural networks [5.8010446129208155]
  Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) leverage neural-networks to find the solutions of partial differential equation (PDE)-constrained optimization problems. We show that the challenge of training persists even when the boundary conditions are strictly enforced. We propose reformulating PINNs on a Lagrangian frame of reference, i.e., LPINNs, as a PDE-informed solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-05T19:48:05Z)
• Enhanced Physics-Informed Neural Networks with Augmented Lagrangian Relaxation Method (AL-PINNs) [1.7403133838762446]
  Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) are powerful approximators of solutions to nonlinear partial differential equations (PDEs) We propose an Augmented Lagrangian relaxation method for PINNs (AL-PINNs) We demonstrate through various numerical experiments that AL-PINNs yield a much smaller relative error compared with that of state-of-the-art adaptive loss-balancing algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-29T08:33:11Z)
• Physics-Informed Neural Operator for Learning Partial Differential Equations [55.406540167010014]
  PINO is the first hybrid approach incorporating data and PDE constraints at different resolutions to learn the operator. The resulting PINO model can accurately approximate the ground-truth solution operator for many popular PDE families.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-06T03:41:34Z)
• Chance-Constrained Control with Lexicographic Deep Reinforcement Learning [77.34726150561087]
  This paper proposes a lexicographic Deep Reinforcement Learning (DeepRL)-based approach to chance-constrained Markov Decision Processes. A lexicographic version of the well-known DeepRL algorithm DQN is also proposed and validated via simulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T13:09:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.