PrAIoritize: Automated Early Prediction and Prioritization of Vulnerabilities in Smart Contracts

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.11082v2
• Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 12:50:01 GMT
• Title: PrAIoritize: Automated Early Prediction and Prioritization of Vulnerabilities in Smart Contracts
• Authors: Majd Soud, Grischa Liebel, Mohammad Hamdaqa,
• Abstract summary: Smart contracts are prone to numerous security threats due to undisclosed vulnerabilities and code weaknesses. Efficient prioritization is crucial for smart contract security. Our research aims to provide an automated approach, PrAIoritize, for prioritizing and predicting critical code weaknesses.
• Score: 1.081463830315253
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Context:Smart contracts are prone to numerous security threats due to undisclosed vulnerabilities and code weaknesses. In Ethereum smart contracts, the challenges of timely addressing these code weaknesses highlight the critical need for automated early prediction and prioritization during the code review process. Efficient prioritization is crucial for smart contract security. Objective:Toward this end, our research aims to provide an automated approach, PrAIoritize, for prioritizing and predicting critical code weaknesses in Ethereum smart contracts during the code review process. Method: To do so, we collected smart contract code reviews sourced from Open Source Software (OSS) on GitHub and the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) database. Subsequently, we developed PrAIoritize, an innovative automated prioritization approach. PrAIoritize integrates advanced Large Language Models (LLMs) with sophisticated natural language processing (NLP) techniques. PrAIoritize automates code review labeling by employing a domain-specific lexicon of smart contract weaknesses and their impacts. Following this, feature engineering is conducted for code reviews, and a pre-trained DistilBERT model is utilized for priority classification. Finally, the model is trained and evaluated using code reviews of smart contracts. Results: Our evaluation demonstrates significant improvement over state-of-the-art baselines and commonly used pre-trained models (e.g. T5) for similar classification tasks, with 4.82\%-27.94\% increase in F-measure, precision, and recall. Conclusion: By leveraging PrAIoritize, practitioners can efficiently prioritize smart contract code weaknesses, addressing critical code weaknesses promptly and reducing the time and effort required for manual triage.

Related papers

• Smart-LLaMA: Two-Stage Post-Training of Large Language Models for Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection and Explanation [21.39496709865097]
  Existing smart contract vulnerability detection methods face three main issues. Insufficient quality of datasets, lacking detailed explanations and precise vulnerability locations. We propose Smart-LLaMA, an advanced detection method based on the LLaMA language model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-09T15:49:42Z)
• Codev-Bench: How Do LLMs Understand Developer-Centric Code Completion? [60.84912551069379]
  We present the Code-Development Benchmark (Codev-Bench), a fine-grained, real-world, repository-level, and developer-centric evaluation framework. Codev-Agent is an agent-based system that automates repository crawling, constructs execution environments, extracts dynamic calling chains from existing unit tests, and generates new test samples to avoid data leakage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T09:11:10Z)
• Contractual Reinforcement Learning: Pulling Arms with Invisible Hands [68.77645200579181]
  We propose a theoretical framework for aligning economic interests of different stakeholders in the online learning problems through contract design. For the planning problem, we design an efficient dynamic programming algorithm to determine the optimal contracts against the far-sighted agent. For the learning problem, we introduce a generic design of no-regret learning algorithms to untangle the challenges from robust design of contracts to the balance of exploration and exploitation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T16:53:00Z)
• Soley: Identification and Automated Detection of Logic Vulnerabilities in Ethereum Smart Contracts Using Large Language Models [1.081463830315253]
  We empirically investigate logic vulnerabilities in real-world smart contracts extracted from code changes on GitHub. We introduce Soley, an automated method for detecting logic vulnerabilities in smart contracts. We examine mitigation strategies employed by smart contract developers to address these vulnerabilities in real-world scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T00:15:18Z)
• Vulnerabilities of smart contracts and mitigation schemes: A Comprehensive Survey [0.6554326244334866]
  This paper presents a literature review combined with an experimental report that aims to assist developers in developing secure smarts. It provides a list of frequent vulnerabilities and corresponding mitigation solutions. It evaluates the community most widely used tools by executing and testing them on sample smart contracts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T19:36:53Z)
• An Empirical Study of AI-based Smart Contract Creation [4.801455786801489]
  Large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and Google Palm2 for smart contract generation seem to be the first well-established instance of an AI pair programmer. The main objective of this study is to assess the quality of generated code provided by LLMs for smart contracts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-05T21:38:57Z)
• Generation Probabilities Are Not Enough: Uncertainty Highlighting in AI Code Completions [54.55334589363247]
  We study whether conveying information about uncertainty enables programmers to more quickly and accurately produce code. We find that highlighting tokens with the highest predicted likelihood of being edited leads to faster task completion and more targeted edits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-14T18:43:34Z)
• CodeLMSec Benchmark: Systematically Evaluating and Finding Security Vulnerabilities in Black-Box Code Language Models [58.27254444280376]
  Large language models (LLMs) for automatic code generation have achieved breakthroughs in several programming tasks. Training data for these models is usually collected from the Internet (e.g., from open-source repositories) and is likely to contain faults and security vulnerabilities. This unsanitized training data can cause the language models to learn these vulnerabilities and propagate them during the code generation procedure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-08T11:54:07Z)
• CodeRL: Mastering Code Generation through Pretrained Models and Deep Reinforcement Learning [92.36705236706678]
  "CodeRL" is a new framework for program synthesis tasks through pretrained LMs and deep reinforcement learning. During inference, we introduce a new generation procedure with a critical sampling strategy. For the model backbones, we extended the encoder-decoder architecture of CodeT5 with enhanced learning objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-05T02:42:15Z)
• A Bytecode-based Approach for Smart Contract Classification [10.483992071557195]
  The number of smart contracts deployed on blockchain platforms is growing exponentially, which makes it difficult for users to find desired services by manual screening. Current research on smart contract classification focuses on Natural Language Processing (NLP) solutions which are based on contract source code. This paper proposes a classification model based on features from contract bytecode instead of source code to solve these problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-31T03:00:29Z)
• ESCORT: Ethereum Smart COntRacTs Vulnerability Detection using Deep Neural Network and Transfer Learning [80.85273827468063]
  Existing machine learning-based vulnerability detection methods are limited and only inspect whether the smart contract is vulnerable. We propose ESCORT, the first Deep Neural Network (DNN)-based vulnerability detection framework for smart contracts. We show that ESCORT achieves an average F1-score of 95% on six vulnerability types and the detection time is 0.02 seconds per contract.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-23T15:04:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.