Dissecting Misalignment of Multimodal Large Language Models via Influence Function
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.11667v1
- Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:45:41 GMT
- Title: Dissecting Misalignment of Multimodal Large Language Models via Influence Function
- Authors: Lijie Hu, Chenyang Ren, Huanyi Xie, Khouloud Saadi, Shu Yang, Jingfeng Zhang, Di Wang,
- Abstract summary: We introduce the Extended Influence Function for Contrastive Loss (ECIF), an influence function crafted for contrastive loss.
ECIF considers both positive and negative samples and provides a closed-form approximation of contrastive learning models.
Building upon ECIF, we develop a series of algorithms for data evaluation in MLLM, misalignment detection, and misprediction trace-back tasks.
- Score: 12.832792175138241
- License:
- Abstract: Multi-modal Large Language models (MLLMs) are always trained on data from diverse and unreliable sources, which may contain misaligned or mislabeled text-image pairs. This frequently causes robustness issues and hallucinations, leading to performance degradation. Data valuation is an efficient way to detect and trace these misalignments. Nevertheless, existing methods are computationally expensive for MLLMs. While computationally efficient, the classical influence functions are inadequate for contrastive learning models because they were originally designed for pointwise loss. Additionally, contrastive learning involves minimizing the distance between the modalities of positive samples and maximizing the distance between the modalities of negative samples. This requires us to evaluate the influence of samples from both perspectives. To tackle these challenges, we introduce the Extended Influence Function for Contrastive Loss (ECIF), an influence function crafted for contrastive loss. ECIF considers both positive and negative samples and provides a closed-form approximation of contrastive learning models, eliminating the need for retraining. Building upon ECIF, we develop a series of algorithms for data evaluation in MLLM, misalignment detection, and misprediction trace-back tasks. Experimental results demonstrate our ECIF advances the transparency and interpretability of MLLMs by offering a more accurate assessment of data impact and model alignment compared to traditional baseline methods.
Related papers
- Impact of Missing Values in Machine Learning: A Comprehensive Analysis [0.0]
This paper aims to examine the nuanced impact of missing values on machine learning (ML) models.
Our analysis focuses on the challenges posed by missing values, including biased inferences, reduced predictive power, and increased computational burdens.
The study employs case studies and real-world examples to illustrate the practical implications of addressing missing values.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-10T18:31:44Z) - Enhancing Training Data Attribution for Large Language Models with Fitting Error Consideration [74.09687562334682]
We introduce a novel training data attribution method called Debias and Denoise Attribution (DDA)
Our method significantly outperforms existing approaches, achieving an averaged AUC of 91.64%.
DDA exhibits strong generality and scalability across various sources and different-scale models like LLaMA2, QWEN2, and Mistral.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-02T07:14:26Z) - A Gradient Analysis Framework for Rewarding Good and Penalizing Bad Examples in Language Models [63.949883238901414]
We present a unique angle of gradient analysis of loss functions that simultaneously reward good examples and penalize bad ones in LMs.
We find that ExMATE serves as a superior surrogate for MLE, and that combining DPO with ExMATE instead of MLE further enhances both the statistical (5-7%) and generative (+18% win rate) performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-29T17:46:18Z) - On Effects of Steering Latent Representation for Large Language Model Unlearning [4.058064008234271]
Representation Misdirection for Unlearning (RMU) is an effective method for large language model (LLM) unlearning.
We show that steering forget representations in the intermediate layer reduces token confidence, causing LLMs to generate wrong or nonsense responses.
We propose Adaptive RMU -- a simple yet effective alternative method that makes unlearning effective with most layers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-12T15:24:50Z) - Large Language Models are Biased Reinforcement Learners [0.0]
We show that large language models (LLMs) exhibit behavioral signatures of a relative value bias.
Computational cognitive modeling reveals that LLM behavior is well-described by a simple RL algorithm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-19T01:43:52Z) - Querying Easily Flip-flopped Samples for Deep Active Learning [63.62397322172216]
Active learning is a machine learning paradigm that aims to improve the performance of a model by strategically selecting and querying unlabeled data.
One effective selection strategy is to base it on the model's predictive uncertainty, which can be interpreted as a measure of how informative a sample is.
This paper proposes the it least disagree metric (LDM) as the smallest probability of disagreement of the predicted label.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-18T08:12:23Z) - Towards Better Modeling with Missing Data: A Contrastive Learning-based
Visual Analytics Perspective [7.577040836988683]
Missing data can pose a challenge for machine learning (ML) modeling.
Current approaches are categorized into feature imputation and label prediction.
This study proposes a Contrastive Learning framework to model observed data with missing values.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-18T13:16:24Z) - To Repeat or Not To Repeat: Insights from Scaling LLM under Token-Crisis [50.31589712761807]
Large language models (LLMs) are notoriously token-hungry during pre-training, and high-quality text data on the web is approaching its scaling limit for LLMs.
We investigate the consequences of repeating pre-training data, revealing that the model is susceptible to overfitting.
Second, we examine the key factors contributing to multi-epoch degradation, finding that significant factors include dataset size, model parameters, and training objectives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-22T17:02:15Z) - MAML is a Noisy Contrastive Learner [72.04430033118426]
Model-agnostic meta-learning (MAML) is one of the most popular and widely-adopted meta-learning algorithms nowadays.
We provide a new perspective to the working mechanism of MAML and discover that: MAML is analogous to a meta-learner using a supervised contrastive objective function.
We propose a simple but effective technique, zeroing trick, to alleviate such interference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-29T12:52:26Z) - DEALIO: Data-Efficient Adversarial Learning for Imitation from
Observation [57.358212277226315]
In imitation learning from observation IfO, a learning agent seeks to imitate a demonstrating agent using only observations of the demonstrated behavior without access to the control signals generated by the demonstrator.
Recent methods based on adversarial imitation learning have led to state-of-the-art performance on IfO problems, but they typically suffer from high sample complexity due to a reliance on data-inefficient, model-free reinforcement learning algorithms.
This issue makes them impractical to deploy in real-world settings, where gathering samples can incur high costs in terms of time, energy, and risk.
We propose a more data-efficient IfO algorithm
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-31T23:46:32Z) - Exploring Adversarial Robustness of Deep Metric Learning [25.12224002984514]
DML uses deep neural architectures to learn semantic embeddings of the input.
We tackle the primary challenge of the metric losses being dependent on the samples in a mini-batch.
Using experiments on three commonly-used DML datasets, we demonstrate 5-76 fold increases in adversarial accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-14T23:18:12Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.