The Impact of Live Polling Quizzes on Student Engagement and Performance
in Computer Science Lectures
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.12335v1
- Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 09:57:55 GMT
- Title: The Impact of Live Polling Quizzes on Student Engagement and Performance
in Computer Science Lectures
- Authors: Xingyu Zhao
- Abstract summary: Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the adoption of live polling and real-time feedback tools gained traction in higher education.
Recent changes in learning behaviours due to the pandemic necessitate a reevaluation of these active learning technologies.
- Score: 2.152298082788376
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the adoption of live polling and real-time
feedback tools gained traction in higher education to enhance student
engagement and learning outcomes. Integrating live polling activities has been
shown to boost attention, participation, and understanding of course materials.
However, recent changes in learning behaviours due to the pandemic necessitate
a reevaluation of these active learning technologies. In this context, our
study focuses on the Computer Science (CS) domain, investigating the impact of
Live Polling Quizzes (LPQs) in undergraduate CS lectures. These quizzes
comprise fact-based, formally defined questions with clear answers, aiming to
enhance engagement, learning outcomes, and overall perceptions of the course
module. A survey was conducted among 70 undergraduate CS students, attending CS
modules with and without LPQs. The results revealed that while LPQs contributed
to higher attendance, other factors likely influenced attendance rates more
significantly. LPQs were generally viewed positively, aiding comprehension and
maintaining student attention and motivation. However, careful management of
LPQ frequency is crucial to prevent overuse for some students and potential
reduced motivation. Clear instructions for using the polling software were also
highlighted as essential.
Related papers
- Selection-p: Self-Supervised Task-Agnostic Prompt Compression for Faithfulness and Transferability [67.77534983324229]
In this paper, we investigate the ability of Large Language Models to develop a unified compression method that discretizes uninformative tokens.
Experiments show Selection-p achieves state-of-the-art performance across numerous classification tasks.
It exhibits superior transferability to different models compared to prior work.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-15T17:05:25Z) - Exploring Factors Affecting Student Learning Satisfaction during COVID-19 in South Korea [0.0]
This study aimed to understand several facets related to student learning preferences and satisfaction during the pandemic.
Data gathered included students' gender, study major, satisfaction and motivation levels when learning, perceived performance, emotional state and learning environment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-12T14:28:11Z) - Scalable Two-Minute Feedback: Digital, Lecture-Accompanying Survey as a Continuous Feedback Instrument [0.0]
Detailed feedback on courses and lecture content is essential for their improvement and also serves as a tool for reflection.
The article used a digital survey format as formative feedback which attempts to measure student stress in a quantitative part and to address the participants' reflection in a qualitative part.
The results show a low, but constant rate of feedback. Responses mostly cover topics of the lecture content or organizational aspects and were intensively used to report issues within the lecture.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-30T08:14:26Z) - UKP-SQuARE: An Interactive Tool for Teaching Question Answering [61.93372227117229]
The exponential growth of question answering (QA) has made it an indispensable topic in any Natural Language Processing (NLP) course.
We introduce UKP-SQuARE as a platform for QA education.
Students can run, compare, and analyze various QA models from different perspectives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-31T11:29:04Z) - Quiz-based Knowledge Tracing [61.9152637457605]
Knowledge tracing aims to assess individuals' evolving knowledge states according to their learning interactions.
QKT achieves state-of-the-art performance compared to existing methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-05T12:48:42Z) - Towards Mitigating ChatGPT's Negative Impact on Education: Optimizing
Question Design through Bloom's Taxonomy [0.0]
This paper introduces an evolutionary approach that aims to identify the best set of Bloom's taxonomy keywords to generate questions that these tools have low confidence in answering.
The effectiveness of this approach is evaluated through a case study that uses questions from a Data Structures and Representation course being taught at the University of New South Wales in Canberra, Australia.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-31T00:01:59Z) - Responsible Active Learning via Human-in-the-loop Peer Study [88.01358655203441]
We propose a responsible active learning method, namely Peer Study Learning (PSL), to simultaneously preserve data privacy and improve model stability.
We first introduce a human-in-the-loop teacher-student architecture to isolate unlabelled data from the task learner (teacher) on the cloud-side.
During training, the task learner instructs the light-weight active learner which then provides feedback on the active sampling criterion.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-24T13:18:27Z) - Disadvantaged students increase their academic performance through
collective intelligence exposure in emergency remote learning due to COVID 19 [105.54048699217668]
During the COVID-19 crisis, educational institutions worldwide shifted from face-to-face instruction to emergency remote teaching (ERT) modalities.
We analyzed data on 7,528 undergraduate students and found that cooperative and consensus dynamics among students in discussion forums positively affect their final GPA.
Using natural language processing, we show that first-year students with low academic performance during high school are exposed to more content-intensive posts in discussion forums.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-10T20:23:38Z) - Assessing Attendance by Peer Information [1.0294998767664172]
We propose a novel method called Relative Attendance Index (RAI) to measure attendance rates.
While traditional attendance focuses on the record of a single person or course, relative attendance emphasizes peer attendance information of relevant individuals or courses.
Experimental results on real-life data show that RAI can indeed better reflect student engagement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-06T15:00:40Z) - The Wits Intelligent Teaching System: Detecting Student Engagement
During Lectures Using Convolutional Neural Networks [0.30458514384586394]
The Wits Intelligent Teaching System (WITS) aims to assist lecturers with real-time feedback regarding student affect.
A CNN based on AlexNet is successfully trained and which significantly outperforms a Support Vector Machine approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-28T12:59:37Z) - Social Engagement versus Learning Engagement -- An Exploratory Study of
FutureLearn Learners [61.58283466715385]
Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) continue to see increasing enrolment, but only a small percent of enrolees completes the MOOCs.
This study is particularly concerned with how learners interact with peers, along with their study progression in MOOCs.
The study was conducted on the less explored FutureLearn platform, which employs a social constructivist approach and promotes collaborative learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-11T16:09:10Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.