Auditing the Compliance and Enforcement of Twitter's Advertising Policy

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.12591v2
• Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 09:54:20 GMT
• Title: Auditing the Compliance and Enforcement of Twitter's Advertising Policy
• Authors: Yash Vekaria, Zubair Shafiq, Savvas Zannettou,
• Abstract summary: We analyze approximately 35 thousand ads on Twitter with respect to their compliance to the adult content ad policy.<n>We find that nearly 38% of ads violate Twitter's adult content advertising policy, although the platform eventually removed only about 63% of these non-compliant adult ads.<n>Overall, our findings highlight blind spots in Twitter's adult ad policy enforcement for certain languages and countries.
• Score: 18.927437676695913
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Online platforms have enacted various policies to maintain a safe and trustworthy advertising environment. However, the extent to which these policies are adhered to and enforced remains a subject of interest and concern. In this work, we present a large-scale audit of adult advertising on Twitter (now X), specifically focusing on compliance with its adult (sexual) content advertising policy. Twitter is an interesting case study in that it -- uniquely from other social media platforms -- allows posting of adult content but prohibits adult content in advertising. We analyze approximately 35 thousand ads on Twitter with respect to their compliance to the adult content ad policy through Perspective API and manual annotations. Among other things, we find that nearly 38% of ads violate Twitter's adult content advertising policy, although the platform eventually removed only about 63% of these non-compliant adult ads. We also find inconsistencies in the moderation of such ads across languages, highlighting the need for more reliable and consistent moderation practices across various languages. Overall, our findings highlight blind spots in Twitter's adult ad policy enforcement for certain languages and countries. Our work underscores the importance of external audits to monitor compliance and improve transparency in online advertising.

Related papers

• Exploring Political Ads on News and Media Websites During the 2024 U.S. Elections [13.059585241967769]
  We analyze political ad content appearing on websites leading up to and during the 2024 U.S. elections. Among our findings: a prevalence of clickbait political news ads, echoing prior work. We join prior work in calling for more oversight and transparency of political-related ads on the web.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T20:34:39Z)
• On the Use of Proxies in Political Ad Targeting [49.61009579554272]
  We show that major political advertisers circumvented mitigations by targeting proxy attributes. Our findings have crucial implications for the ongoing discussion on the regulation of political advertising.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T17:15:13Z)
• Advertiser Content Understanding via LLMs for Google Ads Safety [9.376815457907195]
  This study proposes a method to understand advertiser's intent for content policy violations, using Large Language Models (LLMs) We generate advertiser's content profile based on multiple signals from their ads, domains, targeting info, etc. After minimal prompt tuning our method was able to reach 95% accuracy on a small test set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-10T00:57:51Z)
• Why am I Still Seeing This: Measuring the Effectiveness Of Ad Controls and Explanations in AI-Mediated Ad Targeting Systems [55.02903075972816]
  We evaluate the effectiveness of Meta's "See less" ad control and the actionability of ad targeting explanations following the shift to AI-mediated targeting. We find that utilizing the "See less" ad control for the topics we study does not significantly reduce the number of ads shown by Meta on these topics. We find that the majority of ad targeting explanations for local ads made no reference to location-specific targeting criteria.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T18:03:11Z)
• Long-Term Ad Memorability: Understanding & Generating Memorable Ads [54.23854539909078]
  There has been no large-scale study on the memorability of ads. We release the first memorability dataset, LAMBDA, consisting of 1749 participants and 2205 ads covering 276 brands.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-01T10:27:04Z)
• Discrimination through Image Selection by Job Advertisers on Facebook [79.21648699199648]
  We propose and investigate the prevalence of a new means for discrimination in job advertising. It combines both targeting and delivery -- through the disproportionate representation or exclusion of people of certain demographics in job ad images. We use the Facebook Ad Library to demonstrate the prevalence of this practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T03:43:58Z)
• Problematic Advertising and its Disparate Exposure on Facebook [15.667983888666312]
  We study Facebook and investigate key gaps in our understanding of problematic online advertising. We find that older people and minority groups are especially likely to be shown such ads. Given that 22% of problematic ads had no specific targeting from advertisers, we infer that ad delivery algorithms played a significant role in the biased distribution of these ads.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-09T17:23:59Z)
• Russo-Ukrainian War: Prediction and explanation of Twitter suspension [47.61306219245444]
  This study focuses on the Twitter suspension mechanism and the analysis of shared content and features of user accounts that may lead to this. We have obtained a dataset containing 107.7M tweets, originating from 9.8 million users, using Twitter API. Our results reveal scam campaigns taking advantage of trending topics regarding the Russia-Ukrainian conflict for Bitcoin fraud, spam, and advertisement campaigns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T08:41:02Z)
• Manipulating Twitter Through Deletions [64.33261764633504]
  Research into influence campaigns on Twitter has mostly relied on identifying malicious activities from tweets obtained via public APIs. Here, we provide the first exhaustive, large-scale analysis of anomalous deletion patterns involving more than a billion deletions by over 11 million accounts. We find that a small fraction of accounts delete a large number of tweets daily. First, limits on tweet volume are circumvented, allowing certain accounts to flood the network with over 26 thousand daily tweets. Second, coordinated networks of accounts engage in repetitive likes and unlikes of content that is eventually deleted, which can manipulate ranking algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-25T20:07:08Z)
• An influencer-based approach to understanding radical right viral tweets [0.0]
  ROT provides insight into the content, engagement and followership of a set of 35 radical right influencers. It includes over 50,000 original entries and over 40 million retweets, quotes, replies and mentions. It is crucial to account for the influencer-level structure, and find evidence of the importance of both influencer- and content-level factors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-15T21:40:25Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Analyzing the "Sleeping Giants" Activism Model in Brazil [1.549278866004654]
  Sleeping Giants Brasil (SGB) campaigned against media outlets using Twitter to ask companies to remove ads from the targeted outlets. This work presents a thorough quantitative characterization of this activism model, analyzing the three campaigns carried out by SGB between May and September 2020.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-16T21:47:30Z)
• Understanding the Complexity of Detecting Political Ads [0.9391375268580806]
  We take an empirical approach to analyze what kind of ads are deemed political by ordinary people and what kind of ads lead to disagreement. Our results imply that it is important to consider social issue ads as political, but they also complicate political advertising regulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-01T07:44:08Z)
• Facebook Ads: Politics of Migration in Italy [12.947791375188022]
  We employ a new resource for political ad monitoring -- Facebook Ads Library -- to examine advertising concerning the issue of immigration in Italy. We find evidence of targeting by the parties both in terms of geography and demographics (age and gender) We urge the research community to include online advertising in the monitoring of public discourse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-09T09:32:31Z)
• Facebook Political Ads And Accountability: Outside Groups Are Most Negative, Especially When Hiding Donors [0.0]
  We analyze how transparency and accountability deficits relate to the sentiment of political ads on Facebook. The most negative advertising came from dark money and disappearing outside groups. Only dark money was associated with a significant decrease in ad sentiment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-05T00:53:43Z)
• An Empirical Study of In-App Advertising Issues Based on Large Scale App Review Analysis [67.58267006314415]
  We present a large-scale analysis on ad-related user feedback from App Store and Google Play. From a statistical analysis of 36,309 ad-related reviews, we find that users care most about the number of unique ads and ad display frequency during usage. Some ad issue types are addressed more quickly by developers than other ad issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-22T05:38:24Z)
• Do Interruptions Pay Off? Effects of Interruptive Ads on Consumers Willingness to Pay [79.9312329825761]
  We present the results of a study designed to measure the impact of interruptive advertising on consumers willingness to pay for products bearing the advertiser's brand. Our results contribute to the research on the economic impact of advertising, and introduce a method of measuring actual (as opposed to self-reported) willingness to pay in experimental marketing research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-14T09:26:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.