Auditing the Compliance and Enforcement of Twitter's Advertising Policy

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.12591v2
• Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 09:54:20 GMT
• Title: Auditing the Compliance and Enforcement of Twitter's Advertising Policy
• Authors: Yash Vekaria, Zubair Shafiq, Savvas Zannettou,
• Abstract summary: We analyze approximately 35 thousand ads on Twitter with respect to their compliance to the adult content ad policy. We find that nearly 38% of ads violate Twitter's adult content advertising policy, although the platform eventually removed only about 63% of these non-compliant adult ads. Overall, our findings highlight blind spots in Twitter's adult ad policy enforcement for certain languages and countries.
• Score: 18.927437676695913
• License:
• Abstract: Online platforms have enacted various policies to maintain a safe and trustworthy advertising environment. However, the extent to which these policies are adhered to and enforced remains a subject of interest and concern. In this work, we present a large-scale audit of adult advertising on Twitter (now X), specifically focusing on compliance with its adult (sexual) content advertising policy. Twitter is an interesting case study in that it -- uniquely from other social media platforms -- allows posting of adult content but prohibits adult content in advertising. We analyze approximately 35 thousand ads on Twitter with respect to their compliance to the adult content ad policy through Perspective API and manual annotations. Among other things, we find that nearly 38% of ads violate Twitter's adult content advertising policy, although the platform eventually removed only about 63% of these non-compliant adult ads. We also find inconsistencies in the moderation of such ads across languages, highlighting the need for more reliable and consistent moderation practices across various languages. Overall, our findings highlight blind spots in Twitter's adult ad policy enforcement for certain languages and countries. Our work underscores the importance of external audits to monitor compliance and improve transparency in online advertising.

Related papers

• On the Use of Proxies in Political Ad Targeting [49.61009579554272]
  We show that major political advertisers circumvented mitigations by targeting proxy attributes. Our findings have crucial implications for the ongoing discussion on the regulation of political advertising.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T17:15:13Z)
• Advertiser Content Understanding via LLMs for Google Ads Safety [9.376815457907195]
  This study proposes a method to understand advertiser's intent for content policy violations, using Large Language Models (LLMs) We generate advertiser's content profile based on multiple signals from their ads, domains, targeting info, etc. After minimal prompt tuning our method was able to reach 95% accuracy on a small test set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-10T00:57:51Z)
• Long-Term Ad Memorability: Understanding & Generating Memorable Ads [54.23854539909078]
  Despite the importance of long-term memory in marketing and brand building, until now, there has been no large-scale study on the memorability of ads. We release the first memorability dataset, LAMBDA, consisting of 1749 participants and 2205 ads covering 276 brands. Running statistical tests over different participant subpopulations and ad types, we find many interesting insights into what makes an ad memorable, e.g., fast-moving ads are more memorable than those with slower scenes. We present a scalable method to build a high-quality memorable ad generation model by leveraging automatically annotated data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-01T10:27:04Z)
• Discrimination through Image Selection by Job Advertisers on Facebook [79.21648699199648]
  We propose and investigate the prevalence of a new means for discrimination in job advertising. It combines both targeting and delivery -- through the disproportionate representation or exclusion of people of certain demographics in job ad images. We use the Facebook Ad Library to demonstrate the prevalence of this practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T03:43:58Z)
• Problematic Advertising and its Disparate Exposure on Facebook [15.667983888666312]
  We study Facebook and investigate key gaps in our understanding of problematic online advertising. We find that older people and minority groups are especially likely to be shown such ads. Given that 22% of problematic ads had no specific targeting from advertisers, we infer that ad delivery algorithms played a significant role in the biased distribution of these ads.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-09T17:23:59Z)
• Russo-Ukrainian War: Prediction and explanation of Twitter suspension [47.61306219245444]
  This study focuses on the Twitter suspension mechanism and the analysis of shared content and features of user accounts that may lead to this. We have obtained a dataset containing 107.7M tweets, originating from 9.8 million users, using Twitter API. Our results reveal scam campaigns taking advantage of trending topics regarding the Russia-Ukrainian conflict for Bitcoin fraud, spam, and advertisement campaigns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T08:41:02Z)
• Multilingual Disinformation Detection for Digital Advertising [0.9684919127633844]
  We make the first step towards quickly detecting and red-flaging websites that potentially manipulate the public with disinformation. We build a machine learning model based on multilingual text embeddings that first determines whether the page mentions a topic of interest, then estimates the likelihood of the content being malicious. Our system empowers internal teams to proactively blacklist unsafe content, thus protecting the reputation of the advertisement provider.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-04T10:29:20Z)
• Manipulating Twitter Through Deletions [64.33261764633504]
  Research into influence campaigns on Twitter has mostly relied on identifying malicious activities from tweets obtained via public APIs. Here, we provide the first exhaustive, large-scale analysis of anomalous deletion patterns involving more than a billion deletions by over 11 million accounts. We find that a small fraction of accounts delete a large number of tweets daily. First, limits on tweet volume are circumvented, allowing certain accounts to flood the network with over 26 thousand daily tweets. Second, coordinated networks of accounts engage in repetitive likes and unlikes of content that is eventually deleted, which can manipulate ranking algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-25T20:07:08Z)
• An influencer-based approach to understanding radical right viral tweets [0.0]
  ROT provides insight into the content, engagement and followership of a set of 35 radical right influencers. It includes over 50,000 original entries and over 40 million retweets, quotes, replies and mentions. It is crucial to account for the influencer-level structure, and find evidence of the importance of both influencer- and content-level factors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-15T21:40:25Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Understanding the Complexity of Detecting Political Ads [0.9391375268580806]
  We take an empirical approach to analyze what kind of ads are deemed political by ordinary people and what kind of ads lead to disagreement. Our results imply that it is important to consider social issue ads as political, but they also complicate political advertising regulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-01T07:44:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.