Related papers: Transfer of Reinforcement Learning-Based Controllers from Model- to Hardware-in-the-Loop

Transfer of Reinforcement Learning-Based Controllers from Model- to Hardware-in-the-Loop

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.17671v1
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 09:13:12 GMT
Title: Transfer of Reinforcement Learning-Based Controllers from Model- to Hardware-in-the-Loop
Authors: Mario Picerno, Lucas Koch, Kevin Badalian, Marius Wegener, Joschka Schaub, Charles Robert Koch, and Jakob Andert
Abstract summary: Reinforcement Learning has great potential for autonomously training agents to perform complex control tasks. To use RL effectively in embedded system function development, the generated agents must be able to handle real-world applications. This work focuses on accelerating the training process of RL agents by combining Transfer Learning (TL) and X-in-the-Loop (XiL) simulation.
Score: 1.8218298349840023
License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Abstract: The process of developing control functions for embedded systems is resource-, time-, and data-intensive, often resulting in sub-optimal cost and solutions approaches. Reinforcement Learning (RL) has great potential for autonomously training agents to perform complex control tasks with minimal human intervention. Due to costly data generation and safety constraints, however, its application is mostly limited to purely simulated domains. To use RL effectively in embedded system function development, the generated agents must be able to handle real-world applications. In this context, this work focuses on accelerating the training process of RL agents by combining Transfer Learning (TL) and X-in-the-Loop (XiL) simulation. For the use case of transient exhaust gas re-circulation control for an internal combustion engine, use of a computationally cheap Model-in-the-Loop (MiL) simulation is made to select a suitable algorithm, fine-tune hyperparameters, and finally train candidate agents for the transfer. These pre-trained RL agents are then fine-tuned in a Hardware-in-the-Loop (HiL) system via TL. The transfer revealed the need for adjusting the reward parameters when advancing to real hardware. Further, the comparison between a purely HiL-trained and a transferred agent showed a reduction of training time by a factor of 5.9. The results emphasize the necessity to train RL agents with real hardware, and demonstrate that the maturity of the transferred policies affects both training time and performance, highlighting the strong synergies between TL and XiL simulation.