First Tragedy, then Parse: History Repeats Itself in the New Era of Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.05020v2
• Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 02:23:27 GMT
• Title: First Tragedy, then Parse: History Repeats Itself in the New Era of Large Language Models
• Authors: Naomi Saphra, Eve Fleisig, Kyunghyun Cho, Adam Lopez,
• Abstract summary: Many NLP researchers are experiencing an existential crisis triggered by the astonishing success of ChatGPT and other systems based on large language models (LLMs) We look for guidance from the first era of LLMs, which began in 2005 with large $n$-gram models for machine translation (MT) We argue that disparities in scale are transient and researchers can work to reduce them.
• Score: 45.85689795740895
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Many NLP researchers are experiencing an existential crisis triggered by the astonishing success of ChatGPT and other systems based on large language models (LLMs). After such a disruptive change to our understanding of the field, what is left to do? Taking a historical lens, we look for guidance from the first era of LLMs, which began in 2005 with large $n$-gram models for machine translation (MT). We identify durable lessons from the first era, and more importantly, we identify evergreen problems where NLP researchers can continue to make meaningful contributions in areas where LLMs are ascendant. We argue that disparities in scale are transient and researchers can work to reduce them; that data, rather than hardware, is still a bottleneck for many applications; that meaningful realistic evaluation is still an open problem; and that there is still room for speculative approaches.

Related papers

• Large Language Models Think Too Fast To Explore Effectively [0.0]
  The extent to which Large Language Models can effectively explore, particularly in open-ended tasks, remains unclear. This study investigates whether LLMs can surpass humans in exploration during an open-ended task, using Little Alchemy 2 as a paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-29T21:51:17Z)
• Knowledge Graphs, Large Language Models, and Hallucinations: An NLP Perspective [5.769786334333616]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized Natural Language Processing (NLP) based applications including automated text generation, question answering, and others. They face a significant challenge: hallucinations, where models produce plausible-sounding but factually incorrect responses. This paper discusses these open challenges covering state-of-the-art datasets and benchmarks as well as methods for knowledge integration and evaluating hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T16:09:05Z)
• Transforming Scholarly Landscapes: Influence of Large Language Models on Academic Fields beyond Computer Science [77.31665252336157]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have ushered in a transformative era in Natural Language Processing (NLP) This work empirically examines the influence and use of LLMs in fields beyond NLP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-29T01:32:35Z)
• Can Large Language Models Create New Knowledge for Spatial Reasoning Tasks? [0.0]
  We observe that Large Language Models (LLMs) are able to perform sophisticated reasoning on problems with a spatial dimension. This points to a significant level of understanding that state-of-the-art LLMs can now achieve.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T09:54:54Z)
• Analyzing the Role of Semantic Representations in the Era of Large Language Models [104.18157036880287]
  We investigate the role of semantic representations in the era of large language models (LLMs) We propose an AMR-driven chain-of-thought prompting method, which we call AMRCoT. We find that it is difficult to predict which input examples AMR may help or hurt on, but errors tend to arise with multi-word expressions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T17:32:59Z)
• Factuality of Large Language Models: A Survey [29.557596701431827]
  We critically analyze existing work with the aim to identify the major challenges and their associated causes. We analyze the obstacles to automated factuality evaluation for open-ended text generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-04T09:36:31Z)
• Rethinking Interpretability in the Era of Large Language Models [76.1947554386879]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a wide array of tasks. The capability to explain in natural language allows LLMs to expand the scale and complexity of patterns that can be given to a human. These new capabilities raise new challenges, such as hallucinated explanations and immense computational costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T17:38:54Z)
• The ART of LLM Refinement: Ask, Refine, and Trust [85.75059530612882]
  We propose a reasoning with refinement objective called ART: Ask, Refine, and Trust. It asks necessary questions to decide when an LLM should refine its output. It achieves a performance gain of +5 points over self-refinement baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T07:26:32Z)
• Are Large Language Models Really Robust to Word-Level Perturbations? [68.60618778027694]
  We propose a novel rational evaluation approach that leverages pre-trained reward models as diagnostic tools. Longer conversations manifest the comprehensive grasp of language models in terms of their proficiency in understanding questions. Our results demonstrate that LLMs frequently exhibit vulnerability to word-level perturbations that are commonplace in daily language usage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T09:23:46Z)
• Assessing Hidden Risks of LLMs: An Empirical Study on Robustness, Consistency, and Credibility [37.682136465784254]
  We conduct over a million queries to the mainstream large language models (LLMs) including ChatGPT, LLaMA, and OPT. We find that ChatGPT is still capable to yield the correct answer even when the input is polluted at an extreme level. We propose a novel index associated with a dataset that roughly decides the feasibility of using such data for LLM-involved evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-15T15:44:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.