PatchCraft: Exploring Texture Patch for Efficient AI-generated Image
Detection
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.12397v3
- Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 14:26:32 GMT
- Title: PatchCraft: Exploring Texture Patch for Efficient AI-generated Image
Detection
- Authors: Nan Zhong, Yiran Xu, Sheng Li, Zhenxing Qian, Xinpeng Zhang
- Abstract summary: We propose a novel AI-generated image detector capable of identifying fake images created by a wide range of generative models.
A novel Smash&Reconstruction preprocessing is proposed to erase the global semantic information and enhance texture patches.
Our approach outperforms state-of-the-art baselines by a significant margin.
- Score: 39.820699370876916
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Recent generative models show impressive performance in generating
photographic images. Humans can hardly distinguish such incredibly
realistic-looking AI-generated images from real ones. AI-generated images may
lead to ubiquitous disinformation dissemination. Therefore, it is of utmost
urgency to develop a detector to identify AI generated images. Most existing
detectors suffer from sharp performance drops over unseen generative models. In
this paper, we propose a novel AI-generated image detector capable of
identifying fake images created by a wide range of generative models. We
observe that the texture patches of images tend to reveal more traces left by
generative models compared to the global semantic information of the images. A
novel Smash&Reconstruction preprocessing is proposed to erase the global
semantic information and enhance texture patches. Furthermore, pixels in rich
texture regions exhibit more significant fluctuations than those in poor
texture regions. Synthesizing realistic rich texture regions proves to be more
challenging for existing generative models. Based on this principle, we
leverage the inter-pixel correlation contrast between rich and poor texture
regions within an image to further boost the detection performance.
In addition, we build a comprehensive AI-generated image detection benchmark,
which includes 17 kinds of prevalent generative models, to evaluate the
effectiveness of existing baselines and our approach. Our benchmark provides a
leaderboard for follow-up studies. Extensive experimental results show that our
approach outperforms state-of-the-art baselines by a significant margin. Our
project: https://fdmas.github.io/AIGCDetect
Related papers
- Human vs. AI: A Novel Benchmark and a Comparative Study on the Detection of Generated Images and the Impact of Prompts [5.222694057785324]
This work examines the influence of the prompt's level of detail on the detectability of fake images.
We create a novel dataset, COCOXGEN, which consists of real photos from the COCO dataset as well as images generated with SDXL and Fooocus.
Our user study with 200 participants shows that images generated with longer, more detailed prompts are detected significantly more easily than those generated with short prompts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-12T20:37:52Z) - Understanding and Improving Training-Free AI-Generated Image Detections with Vision Foundation Models [68.90917438865078]
Deepfake techniques for facial synthesis and editing pose serious risks for generative models.
In this paper, we investigate how detection performance varies across model backbones, types, and datasets.
We introduce Contrastive Blur, which enhances performance on facial images, and MINDER, which addresses noise type bias, balancing performance across domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-28T13:04:45Z) - Zero-Shot Detection of AI-Generated Images [54.01282123570917]
We propose a zero-shot entropy-based detector (ZED) to detect AI-generated images.
Inspired by recent works on machine-generated text detection, our idea is to measure how surprising the image under analysis is compared to a model of real images.
ZED achieves an average improvement of more than 3% over the SoTA in terms of accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-24T08:46:13Z) - A Sanity Check for AI-generated Image Detection [49.08585395873425]
We propose AIDE (AI-generated Image DEtector with Hybrid Features) to detect AI-generated images.
AIDE achieves +3.5% and +4.6% improvements to state-of-the-art methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-27T17:59:49Z) - Improving Interpretability and Robustness for the Detection of AI-Generated Images [6.116075037154215]
We analyze existing state-of-the-art AIGI detection methods based on frozen CLIP embeddings.
We show how to interpret them, shedding light on how images produced by various AI generators differ from real ones.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-21T10:33:09Z) - RIGID: A Training-free and Model-Agnostic Framework for Robust AI-Generated Image Detection [60.960988614701414]
RIGID is a training-free and model-agnostic method for robust AI-generated image detection.
RIGID significantly outperforms existing trainingbased and training-free detectors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-30T14:49:54Z) - A Single Simple Patch is All You Need for AI-generated Image Detection [19.541645669791023]
We find that generative models tend to focus on generating the patches with rich textures to make the images more realistic.
In this paper, we propose to exploit the noise pattern of a single simple patch to identify fake images.
Our method can achieve state-of-the-art performance on public benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-02T03:50:45Z) - Detecting Generated Images by Real Images Only [64.12501227493765]
Existing generated image detection methods detect visual artifacts in generated images or learn discriminative features from both real and generated images by massive training.
This paper approaches the generated image detection problem from a new perspective: Start from real images.
By finding the commonality of real images and mapping them to a dense subspace in feature space, the goal is that generated images, regardless of their generative model, are then projected outside the subspace.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-02T03:09:37Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.