Drilling Down into the Discourse Structure with LLMs for Long Document Question Answering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.13565v1
• Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 18:22:56 GMT
• Title: Drilling Down into the Discourse Structure with LLMs for Long Document Question Answering
• Authors: Inderjeet Nair, Shwetha Somasundaram, Apoorv Saxena, Koustava Goswami
• Abstract summary: We propose a suite of techniques that exploit the discourse structure commonly found in documents. We show how our approach can be combined with textitself-ask reasoning agent to achieve best zero-shot performance in complex multi-hop question answering.
• Score: 5.022057415488129
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: We address the task of evidence retrieval for long document question answering, which involves locating relevant paragraphs within a document to answer a question. We aim to assess the applicability of large language models (LLMs) in the task of zero-shot long document evidence retrieval, owing to their unprecedented performance across various NLP tasks. However, currently the LLMs can consume limited context lengths as input, thus providing document chunks as inputs might overlook the global context while missing out on capturing the inter-segment dependencies. Moreover, directly feeding the large input sets can incur significant computational costs, particularly when processing the entire document (and potentially incurring monetary expenses with enterprise APIs like OpenAI's GPT variants). To address these challenges, we propose a suite of techniques that exploit the discourse structure commonly found in documents. By utilizing this structure, we create a condensed representation of the document, enabling a more comprehensive understanding and analysis of relationships between different parts. We retain $99.6\%$ of the best zero-shot approach's performance, while processing only $26\%$ of the total tokens used by the best approach in the information seeking evidence retrieval setup. We also show how our approach can be combined with \textit{self-ask} reasoning agent to achieve best zero-shot performance in complex multi-hop question answering, just $\approx 4\%$ short of zero-shot performance using gold evidence.

Related papers

• M3DocRAG: Multi-modal Retrieval is What You Need for Multi-page Multi-document Understanding [63.33447665725129]
  We introduce M3DocRAG, a novel multi-modal RAG framework that flexibly accommodates various document contexts. M3DocRAG can efficiently handle single or many documents while preserving visual information. We also present M3DocVQA, a new benchmark for evaluating open-domain DocVQA over 3,000+ PDF documents with 40,000+ pages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T18:29:38Z)
• LLM$\times$MapReduce: Simplified Long-Sequence Processing using Large Language Models [73.13933847198395]
  We propose a training-free framework for processing long texts, utilizing a divide-and-conquer strategy to achieve comprehensive document understanding. The proposed LLM$times$MapReduce framework splits the entire document into several chunks for LLMs to read and then aggregates the intermediate answers to produce the final output.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-12T03:13:44Z)
• Refiner: Restructure Retrieval Content Efficiently to Advance Question-Answering Capabilities [30.1331670544648]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are limited by their parametric knowledge, leading to hallucinations in knowledge-extensive tasks. We propose $textitRefiner$, an end-to-end extract-and-restructure paradigm that operates in the post-retrieval process of RAG.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T09:25:10Z)
• Focus Anywhere for Fine-grained Multi-page Document Understanding [24.76897786595502]
  This paper proposes Fox, an effective pipeline, hybrid data, and tuning strategy, that catalyzes LVLMs to focus anywhere on single/multi-page documents. We employ multiple vision vocabularies to extract visual hybrid knowledge for interleaved document pages. We render cross-vocabulary vision data as the foreground to achieve a full reaction of multiple visual vocabularies and in-document figure understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T08:15:49Z)
• Can't Remember Details in Long Documents? You Need Some R&R [4.465645631325957]
  We introduce $textitR&R$ -- a combination of two novel prompt-based methods. In reprompting, we repeat the prompt instructions periodically throughout the context document. In ICR, rather than instructing the LLM to answer the question directly, we instruct it to retrieve the top $k$ passage numbers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T03:03:20Z)
• In-context Pretraining: Language Modeling Beyond Document Boundaries [137.53145699439898]
  In-Context Pretraining is a new approach where language models are pretrained on a sequence of related documents. We introduce approximate algorithms for finding related documents with efficient nearest neighbor search. We see notable improvements in tasks that require more complex contextual reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-16T17:57:12Z)
• PDFTriage: Question Answering over Long, Structured Documents [60.96667912964659]
  Representing structured documents as plain text is incongruous with the user's mental model of these documents with rich structure. We propose PDFTriage that enables models to retrieve the context based on either structure or content. Our benchmark dataset consists of 900+ human-generated questions over 80 structured documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-16T04:29:05Z)
• PEARL: Prompting Large Language Models to Plan and Execute Actions Over Long Documents [78.27865456183397]
  We propose PEARL, a prompting framework to improve reasoning over long documents. Each stage of PEARL is implemented via zero-shot or few-shot prompting with minimal human input. We evaluate PEARL on a challenging subset of the QuALITY dataset, which contains questions that require complex reasoning over long narrative texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T23:06:04Z)
• Information Extraction from Documents: Question Answering vs Token Classification in real-world setups [0.0]
  We compare the Question Answering approach with the classical token classification approach for document key information extraction. Our research showed that when dealing with clean and relatively short entities, it is still best to use token classification-based approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-21T14:43:42Z)
• One-shot Key Information Extraction from Document with Deep Partial Graph Matching [60.48651298832829]
  Key Information Extraction (KIE) from documents improves efficiency, productivity, and security in many industrial scenarios. Existing supervised learning methods for the KIE task need to feed a large number of labeled samples and learn separate models for different types of documents. We propose a deep end-to-end trainable network for one-shot KIE using partial graph matching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-26T07:45:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.