The AI Assessment Scale (AIAS): A Framework for Ethical Integration of Generative AI in Educational Assessment
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.07086v2
- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 03:15:00 GMT
- Title: The AI Assessment Scale (AIAS): A Framework for Ethical Integration of Generative AI in Educational Assessment
- Authors: Mike Perkins, Leon Furze, Jasper Roe, Jason MacVaugh,
- Abstract summary: We outline a practical, simple, and sufficiently comprehensive tool to allow for the integration of GenAI tools into educational assessment.
The AI Assessment Scale (AIAS) empowers educators to select the appropriate level of GenAI usage in assessments.
By adopting a practical, flexible approach, the AIAS can form a much-needed starting point to address the current uncertainty and anxiety regarding GenAI in education.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Recent developments in Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) have created a paradigm shift in multiple areas of society, and the use of these technologies is likely to become a defining feature of education in coming decades. GenAI offers transformative pedagogical opportunities, while simultaneously posing ethical and academic challenges. Against this backdrop, we outline a practical, simple, and sufficiently comprehensive tool to allow for the integration of GenAI tools into educational assessment: the AI Assessment Scale (AIAS). The AIAS empowers educators to select the appropriate level of GenAI usage in assessments based on the learning outcomes they seek to address. The AIAS offers greater clarity and transparency for students and educators, provides a fair and equitable policy tool for institutions to work with, and offers a nuanced approach which embraces the opportunities of GenAI while recognising that there are instances where such tools may not be pedagogically appropriate or necessary. By adopting a practical, flexible approach that can be implemented quickly, the AIAS can form a much-needed starting point to address the current uncertainty and anxiety regarding GenAI in education. As a secondary objective, we engage with the current literature and advocate for a refocused discourse on GenAI tools in education, one which foregrounds how technologies can help support and enhance teaching and learning, which contrasts with the current focus on GenAI as a facilitator of academic misconduct.
Related papers
- From Automation to Cognition: Redefining the Roles of Educators and Generative AI in Computing Education [2.0628700367476203]
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) offers opportunities to revolutionise teaching and learning in Computing Education (CE)
However, educators have expressed concerns that students may over-rely on GenAI and use these tools to generate solutions without engaging in the learning process.
This paper describes our experiences with using GenAI in CS-focused educational settings and the changes we have implemented accordingly in our teaching.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-16T03:36:25Z) - The AI Assessment Scale Revisited: A Framework for Educational Assessment [0.0]
Recent developments in Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) have created significant uncertainty in education.
We present an updated version of the AI Assessment Scale (AIAS), a framework with two fundamental purposes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-12T07:44:52Z) - Generative AI Literacy: Twelve Defining Competencies [48.90506360377104]
This paper introduces a competency-based model for generative artificial intelligence (AI) literacy covering essential skills and knowledge areas necessary to interact with generative AI.
The competencies range from foundational AI literacy to prompt engineering and programming skills, including ethical and legal considerations.
These twelve competencies offer a framework for individuals, policymakers, government officials, and educators looking to navigate and take advantage of the potential of generative AI responsibly.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-29T14:55:15Z) - Generative AI and Agency in Education: A Critical Scoping Review and Thematic Analysis [0.0]
This review examines the relationship between Generative AI (GenAI) and agency in education, analyzing the literature available through the lens of Critical Digital Pedagogy.
We conducted an AI-supported hybrid thematic analysis that revealed three key themes: Control in Digital Spaces, Variable Engagement and Access, and Changing Notions of Agency.
The findings suggest that while GenAI may enhance learner agency through personalization and support, it also risks exacerbating educational inequalities and diminishing learner autonomy in certain contexts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-01T14:40:31Z) - Model-based Maintenance and Evolution with GenAI: A Look into the Future [47.93555901495955]
We argue that Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) can be used as a means to address the limitations of Model-Based Engineering (MBM&E)
We propose that GenAI can be used in MBM&E for: reducing engineers' learning curve, maximizing efficiency with recommendations, or serving as a reasoning tool to understand domain problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-09T23:13:26Z) - The AI Assessment Scale (AIAS) in action: A pilot implementation of GenAI supported assessment [0.0]
The rapid adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) technologies in higher education has raised concerns about academic integrity, assessment practices, and student learning.
This paper presents the findings of a pilot study conducted at British University Vietnam (BUV) exploring the implementation of the Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale (AIAS)
The AIAS consists of five levels, ranging from 'No AI' to 'Full AI', enabling educators to design assessments that focus on areas requiring human input and critical thinking.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-15T08:00:02Z) - Bringing Generative AI to Adaptive Learning in Education [58.690250000579496]
We shed light on the intersectional studies of generative AI and adaptive learning.
We argue that this union will contribute significantly to the development of the next-stage learning format in education.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-02T23:54:51Z) - Toward enriched Cognitive Learning with XAI [44.99833362998488]
We introduce an intelligent system (CL-XAI) for Cognitive Learning which is supported by artificial intelligence (AI) tools.
The use of CL-XAI is illustrated with a game-inspired virtual use case where learners tackle problems to enhance problem-solving skills.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-19T16:13:47Z) - Innovating Computer Programming Pedagogy: The AI-Lab Framework for
Generative AI Adoption [0.0]
We introduce "AI-Lab," a framework for guiding students in effectively leveraging GenAI within core programming courses.
By identifying and rectifying GenAI's errors, students enrich their learning process.
For educators, AI-Lab provides mechanisms to explore students' perceptions of GenAI's role in their learning experience.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-23T17:20:37Z) - An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive
qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence.
The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z) - Personalized Education in the AI Era: What to Expect Next? [76.37000521334585]
The objective of personalized learning is to design an effective knowledge acquisition track that matches the learner's strengths and bypasses her weaknesses to meet her desired goal.
In recent years, the boost of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) has unfolded novel perspectives to enhance personalized education.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-19T12:23:32Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.