Visual AI and Linguistic Intelligence Through Steerability and
Composability
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.12383v1
- Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2023 22:01:33 GMT
- Title: Visual AI and Linguistic Intelligence Through Steerability and
Composability
- Authors: David Noever and Samantha Elizabeth Miller Noever
- Abstract summary: This study explores the capabilities of multimodal large language models (LLMs) in handling challenging multistep tasks that integrate language and vision.
The research presents a series of 14 creatively and constructively diverse tasks, ranging from AI Lego Designing to AI Satellite Image Analysis.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: This study explores the capabilities of multimodal large language models
(LLMs) in handling challenging multistep tasks that integrate language and
vision, focusing on model steerability, composability, and the application of
long-term memory and context understanding. The problem addressed is the LLM's
ability (Nov 2023 GPT-4 Vision Preview) to manage tasks that require
synthesizing visual and textual information, especially where stepwise
instructions and sequential logic are paramount. The research presents a series
of 14 creatively and constructively diverse tasks, ranging from AI Lego
Designing to AI Satellite Image Analysis, designed to test the limits of
current LLMs in contexts that previously proved difficult without extensive
memory and contextual understanding. Key findings from evaluating 800 guided
dialogs include notable disparities in task completion difficulty. For
instance, 'Image to Ingredient AI Bartender' (Low difficulty) contrasted
sharply with 'AI Game Self-Player' (High difficulty), highlighting the LLM's
varying proficiency in processing complex visual data and generating coherent
instructions. Tasks such as 'AI Genetic Programmer' and 'AI Negotiator' showed
high completion difficulty, emphasizing challenges in maintaining context over
multiple steps. The results underscore the importance of developing LLMs that
combine long-term memory and contextual awareness to mimic human-like thought
processes in complex problem-solving scenarios.
Related papers
- VL-GLUE: A Suite of Fundamental yet Challenging Visuo-Linguistic Reasoning Tasks [48.67062958311173]
VL-GLUE is a multitask benchmark for natural language understanding.
We show that this benchmark is quite challenging for existing large-scale vision-language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-17T15:27:17Z) - BloomWise: Enhancing Problem-Solving capabilities of Large Language Models using Bloom's-Taxonomy-Inspired Prompts [59.83547898874152]
We introduce BloomWise, a new prompting technique, inspired by Bloom's taxonomy, to improve the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs)
The decision regarding the need to employ more sophisticated cognitive skills is based on self-evaluation performed by the LLM.
In extensive experiments across 4 popular math reasoning datasets, we have demonstrated the effectiveness of our proposed approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-05T09:27:52Z) - Do Large Language Models Have Compositional Ability? An Investigation into Limitations and Scalability [12.349247962800813]
Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for many AI problems.
They exhibit remarkable in-context learning (ICL) capabilities.
How they approach composite tasks remains an open and largely underexplored question.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-22T15:22:34Z) - Image-of-Thought Prompting for Visual Reasoning Refinement in Multimodal Large Language Models [14.765057045747753]
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and related rationale-based works have significantly improved the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in complex reasoning tasks.
We propose the Image-of-Thought (IoT) prompting method, which helps MLLMs to extract visual rationales step-by-step.
IoT prompting has improved zero-shot visual reasoning performance across various visual understanding tasks in different MLLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-22T17:56:51Z) - Puzzle Solving using Reasoning of Large Language Models: A Survey [1.9939549451457024]
This survey examines the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) in puzzle solving.
Our findings highlight the disparity between LLM capabilities and human-like reasoning.
The survey underscores the necessity for novel strategies and richer datasets to advance LLMs' puzzle-solving proficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-17T14:19:38Z) - INTERS: Unlocking the Power of Large Language Models in Search with Instruction Tuning [59.07490387145391]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in various natural language processing tasks.
Their application to information retrieval (IR) tasks is still challenging due to the infrequent occurrence of many IR-specific concepts in natural language.
We introduce a novel instruction tuning dataset, INTERS, encompassing 20 tasks across three fundamental IR categories.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-12T12:10:28Z) - When does In-context Learning Fall Short and Why? A Study on
Specification-Heavy Tasks [54.71034943526973]
In-context learning (ICL) has become the default method for using large language models (LLMs)
We find that ICL falls short of handling specification-heavy tasks, which are tasks with complicated and extensive task specifications.
We identify three primary reasons: inability to specifically understand context, misalignment in task schema comprehension with humans, and inadequate long-text understanding ability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-15T14:26:30Z) - Lost in Translation: When GPT-4V(ision) Can't See Eye to Eye with Text.
A Vision-Language-Consistency Analysis of VLLMs and Beyond [7.760124498553333]
We study whether vision-language models execute vision and language tasks consistently or independently.
We introduce a systematic framework that quantifies the capability disparities between different modalities in the multi-modal setting.
We introduce "Vision Description Prompting," a method that effectively improves performance in challenging vision-related tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-19T06:45:11Z) - Can Large Language Models Understand Real-World Complex Instructions? [54.86632921036983]
Large language models (LLMs) can understand human instructions, but struggle with complex instructions.
Existing benchmarks are insufficient to assess LLMs' ability to understand complex instructions.
We propose CELLO, a benchmark for evaluating LLMs' ability to follow complex instructions systematically.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-17T04:18:39Z) - Decomposed Prompting: A Modular Approach for Solving Complex Tasks [55.42850359286304]
We propose Decomposed Prompting to solve complex tasks by decomposing them (via prompting) into simpler sub-tasks.
This modular structure allows each prompt to be optimized for its specific sub-task.
We show that the flexibility and modularity of Decomposed Prompting allows it to outperform prior work on few-shot prompting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-05T17:28:20Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.