Quantum null-hypothesis device-independent Schmidt rank witness

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.13996v4
• Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2024 11:31:12 GMT
• Title: Quantum null-hypothesis device-independent Schmidt rank witness
• Authors: Josep Batle, Tomasz Białecki, Tomasz Rybotycki, Jakub Tworzydło, Adam Bednorz,
• Abstract summary: We investigate the dimensionality of bipartite quantum systems by construction of a device-independent null witness test. This test assesses whether a given bipartite state conforms with the expected quantum dimension, Schmidt number, and distinguishes between real and complex spaces.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: We investigate the dimensionality of bipartite quantum systems by construction of a device-independent null witness test. This test assesses whether a given bipartite state conforms with the expected quantum dimension, Schmidt number, and distinguishes between real and complex spaces. By employing local measurements on each party, the proposed method aims to determine the minimal rank. By performing an experimental demonstration on IBM Quantum devices, we prove the exceptional accuracy of the test and its usefulness in diagnostics beyond routine calibrations. One of the tests shows agreement with theoretical expectations within statistical errors. However, the second test failed by more than 6 standard deviations, indicating unspecified parasitic entanglements, with no known simple origin.

Related papers

• Certifying classes of $d$-outcome measurements with quantum steering [49.1574468325115]
  We provide a construction of a family of steering inequalities tailored to large classes of $d$-outcomes projective measurements. We prove that the maximal quantum violation of those inequalities can be used for certification of those measurements and the maximally entangled state of two qudits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-27T15:32:53Z)
• Robust self-testing of the $m-$partite maximally entangled state and observables [0.0]
  We propose a simple and efficient self-testing protocol that certifies the state and observables based on the optimal quantum violation of the Svetlichny inequality. Our method leverages an elegant sum-of-squares approach to derive the optimal quantum value of the Svetlichny functional, devoid of assuming the dimension of the quantum system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-20T11:03:37Z)
• Measurement-Device-Independent Detection of Beyond-Quantum State [53.64687146666141]
  We propose a measurement-device-independent (MDI) test for beyond-quantum state detection. We discuss the importance of tomographic completeness of the input sets to the detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-11T06:40:13Z)
• Genuine multipartite entanglement detection with imperfect measurements: concept and experiment [3.3691648171019364]
  We investigate the detection of genuine multipartite entanglement when measurements are subject to small imperfections. In a tabletop four-partite photonic experiment we demonstrate first how a small amount of alignment error can undermine the conclusions drawn from standard entanglement witnesses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-18T13:19:56Z)
• Experimental demonstration of optimal unambiguous two-out-of-four quantum state elimination [52.77024349608834]
  A core principle of quantum theory is that non-orthogonal quantum states cannot be perfectly distinguished with single-shot measurements. Here we implement a quantum state elimination measurement which unambiguously rules out two of four pure, non-orthogonal quantum states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T18:00:01Z)
• Incompatibility of observables, channels and instruments in information theories [68.8204255655161]
  We study the notion of compatibility for tests of an operational probabilistic theory. We show that a theory admits of incompatible tests if and only if some information cannot be extracted without disturbance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-17T08:44:29Z)
• Experimentally determining the incompatibility of two qubit measurements [55.41644538483948]
  We describe and realize an experimental procedure for assessing the incompatibility of two qubit measurements. We demonstrate this fact in an optical setup, where the qubit states are encoded into the photons' polarization degrees of freedom.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-15T19:01:44Z)
• Entanglement detection in quantum many-body systems using entropic uncertainty relations [0.0]
  We study experimentally accessible lower bounds on entanglement measures based on entropic uncertainty relations. We derive an improved entanglement bound for bipartite systems, which requires measuring joint probability distributions in only two different measurement settings per subsystem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-21T20:50:11Z)
• Nonlocality, steering and quantum state tomography in a single experiment [1.8631700158180744]
  We investigate whether paradigmatic measurements for quantum state tomography can be employed to certify quantum correlations. This allows us to perform state tomography on entangled qutrits, a test of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering and a Bell inequality test, all within a single experiment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-11T09:56:21Z)
• On the optimal certification of von Neumann measurements [55.41644538483948]
  certification of quantum measurements can be viewed as the extension of quantum hypotheses testing. We show the connection between the certification of quantum channels or von Neumann measurements and the notion of $q$-numerical range.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-14T22:38:23Z)
• Semi-device-independent certification of independent quantum state and measurement devices [0.0]
  Certifying that quantum devices behave as intended is crucial for quantum information science. The experimenter assumes the independence of the devices and knowledge of the unambiguous space dimension. The presented methods can readily be implemented in experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-08T22:15:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.