The Causal Axioms of Algebraic Quantum Field Theory: A Diagnostic

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.06504v2
• Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 12:43:52 GMT
• Title: The Causal Axioms of Algebraic Quantum Field Theory: A Diagnostic
• Authors: Francisco Calder\'on
• Abstract summary: Algebraic quantum field theory puts forward three "causal axioms" that aim to characterize the theory as one that implements relativistic causation. This paper aims to show, in a minimally technical way, that none of them fully explains the notion of causation appropriate for AQFT. I advocate for a holistic interpretation of how the axioms characterize the causal structure of AQFT against the strategy in the literature to rivalize the axioms and privilege one among them.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Algebraic quantum field theory (AQFT) puts forward three "causal axioms" that aim to characterize the theory as one that implements relativistic causation: the spectrum condition, microcausality, and primitive causality. In this paper, I aim to show, in a minimally technical way, that none of them fully explains the notion of causation appropriate for AQFT because they only capture some of the desiderata for relativistic causation I state or because it is often unclear how each axiom implements its respective desideratum. After this diagnostic, I will show that a fourth condition, local primitive causality (LPC), fully characterizes relativistic causation in the sense of fulfilling all the relevant desiderata. However, it only encompasses the virtues of the other axioms because it is implied by them, as I will show from a construction by Haag and Schroer (1962). Since the conjunction of the three causal axioms implies LPC and other important results in QFT that LPC does not imply, and since LPC helps clarify some of the shortcomings of the three axioms, I advocate for a holistic interpretation of how the axioms characterize the causal structure of AQFT against the strategy in the literature to rivalize the axioms and privilege one among them.

Related papers

• Pure state entanglement and von Neumann algebras [41.94295877935867]
  We develop the theory of local operations and classical communication (LOCC) for bipartite quantum systems represented by commuting von Neumann algebras. Our theorem implies that, in a bipartite system modeled by commuting factors in Haag duality, a) all states have infinite one-shot entanglement if and only if the local factors are not of type I. In the appendix, we provide a self-contained treatment of majorization on semifinite von Neumann algebras and $sigma$-finite measure spaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-26T11:13:47Z)
• Minimal operational theories: classical theories with quantum features [41.94295877935867]
  We show that almost all minimal theories with conditioning satisfy two quantum no-go theorems. As a relevant example, we construct a minimal toy-theory with conditioning where all systems are classical.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T16:24:09Z)
• Relating Wigner's Friend Scenarios to Nonclassical Causal Compatibility, Monogamy Relations, and Fine Tuning [0.7421845364041001]
  We show that the LF no-go theorem poses formidable challenges for the field of causal modeling. We prove that no nonclassical causal model can explain violations of LF inequalities without violating the No Fine-Tuning principle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-22T16:32:39Z)
• A Measure-Theoretic Axiomatisation of Causality [55.6970314129444]
  We argue in favour of taking Kolmogorov's measure-theoretic axiomatisation of probability as the starting point towards an axiomatisation of causality. Our proposed framework is rigorously grounded in measure theory, but it also sheds light on long-standing limitations of existing frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T13:15:48Z)
• Axiomatization of Interventional Probability Distributions [4.02487511510606]
  Causal intervention is axiomatized under the rules of do-calculus. We show that under our axiomatizations, the intervened distributions are Markovian to the defined intervened causal graphs. We also show that a large class of natural structural causal models satisfy the theory presented here.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-08T06:07:42Z)
• No purification ontology, no quantum paradoxes [0.0]
  It is almost believed that in quantum theory the two following statements hold: 1) all transformations are achieved by a unitary interaction followed by a von Neumann measurement; 2) all mixed states are marginals of pure entangled states. I name this doctrine the dogma purification of ontology. The source of the dogma is the original von Neumann axiomatisation of the theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-08T16:20:06Z)
• Causal Expectation-Maximisation [70.45873402967297]
  We show that causal inference is NP-hard even in models characterised by polytree-shaped graphs. We introduce the causal EM algorithm to reconstruct the uncertainty about the latent variables from data about categorical manifest variables. We argue that there appears to be an unnoticed limitation to the trending idea that counterfactual bounds can often be computed without knowledge of the structural equations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-04T10:25:13Z)
• Unscrambling the omelette of causation and inference: The framework of causal-inferential theories [0.0]
  We introduce the notion of a causal-inferential theory using a process-theoretic formalism. Recasting the notions of operational and realist theories in this mold clarifies what a realist account of an experiment offers beyond an operational account. We argue that if one can identify axioms for a realist causal-inferential theory such that the notions of causation and inference can differ from their conventional (classical) interpretations, then one has the means of defining an intrinsically quantum notion of realism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-07T17:58:22Z)
• Exploiting Game Theory for Analysing Justifications [13.72913891724593]
  We continue the study of justification theory by means of three major contributions. The first is studying the relation between justification theory and game theory. The second contribution is studying under which condition two different dialects of justification theory coincide. The third contribution is establishing a precise criterion of when a semantics induced by justification theory yields consistent results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-04T14:45:08Z)
• From Checking to Inference: Actual Causality Computations as Optimization Problems [79.87179017975235]
  We present a novel approach to formulate different notions of causal reasoning, over binary acyclic models, as optimization problems. We show that both notions are efficiently automated. Using models with more than $8000$ variables, checking is computed in a matter of seconds, with MaxSAT outperforming ILP in many cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-05T10:56:52Z)
• Emergence of classical behavior in the early universe [68.8204255655161]
  Three notions are often assumed to be essentially equivalent, representing different facets of the same phenomenon. We analyze them in general Friedmann-Lemaitre- Robertson-Walker space-times through the lens of geometric structures on the classical phase space. The analysis shows that: (i) inflation does not play an essential role; classical behavior can emerge much more generally; (ii) the three notions are conceptually distinct; classicality can emerge in one sense but not in another.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-22T16:38:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.