Generalization and Informativeness of Conformal Prediction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.11810v1
• Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 10:14:45 GMT
• Title: Generalization and Informativeness of Conformal Prediction
• Authors: Matteo Zecchin, Sangwoo Park, Osvaldo Simeone, Fredrik Hellstr\"om
• Abstract summary: Con conformal prediction (CP) transforms an arbitrary base predictor into a set predictor with coverage guarantees. CP certifies the predicted set to contain the target quantity with a user-defined tolerance, but it does not provide control over the average size of the predicted sets. A theoretical connection is established between the generalization properties of the base predictor and the informativeness of the resulting CP prediction sets. The derived upper bound provides insights into the dependence of the average size of the CP set predictor on the amount of calibration data, the target reliability, and the generalization performance of the base predictor.
• Score: 36.407171992845456
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The safe integration of machine learning modules in decision-making processes hinges on their ability to quantify uncertainty. A popular technique to achieve this goal is conformal prediction (CP), which transforms an arbitrary base predictor into a set predictor with coverage guarantees. While CP certifies the predicted set to contain the target quantity with a user-defined tolerance, it does not provide control over the average size of the predicted sets, i.e., over the informativeness of the prediction. In this work, a theoretical connection is established between the generalization properties of the base predictor and the informativeness of the resulting CP prediction sets. To this end, an upper bound is derived on the expected size of the CP set predictor that builds on generalization error bounds for the base predictor. The derived upper bound provides insights into the dependence of the average size of the CP set predictor on the amount of calibration data, the target reliability, and the generalization performance of the base predictor. The theoretical insights are validated using simple numerical regression and classification tasks.

Related papers

• Provably Reliable Conformal Prediction Sets in the Presence of Data Poisoning [53.42244686183879]
  Conformal prediction provides model-agnostic and distribution-free uncertainty quantification. Yet, conformal prediction is not reliable under poisoning attacks where adversaries manipulate both training and calibration data. We propose reliable prediction sets (RPS): the first efficient method for constructing conformal prediction sets with provable reliability guarantees under poisoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-13T15:37:11Z)
• Online scalable Gaussian processes with conformal prediction for guaranteed coverage [32.21093722162573]
  The consistency of the resulting uncertainty values hinges on the premise that the learning function conforms to the properties specified by the GP model. We propose to wed the GP with the prevailing conformal prediction (CP), a distribution-free post-processing framework that produces it prediction sets with a provably valid coverage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T19:22:15Z)
• Enhancing Conformal Prediction Using E-Test Statistics [0.0]
  Conformal Prediction (CP) serves as a robust framework that quantifies uncertainty in predictions made by Machine Learning (ML) models. This paper ventures down an alternative path, harnessing the power of e-test statistics to augment the efficacy of conformal predictions by introducing a BB-predictor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T01:14:25Z)
• On the Expected Size of Conformal Prediction Sets [24.161372736642157]
  We theoretically quantify the expected size of the prediction sets under the split conformal prediction framework. As this precise formulation cannot usually be calculated directly, we derive point estimates and high-probability bounds interval. We corroborate the efficacy of our results with experiments on real-world datasets for both regression and classification problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-12T17:22:57Z)
• Uncertainty Quantification over Graph with Conformalized Graph Neural Networks [52.20904874696597]
  Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are powerful machine learning prediction models on graph-structured data. GNNs lack rigorous uncertainty estimates, limiting their reliable deployment in settings where the cost of errors is significant. We propose conformalized GNN (CF-GNN), extending conformal prediction (CP) to graph-based models for guaranteed uncertainty estimates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T21:38:23Z)
• Conformal Prediction Intervals for Remaining Useful Lifetime Estimation [5.171601921549565]
  We investigate the conformal prediction (CP) framework that represents uncertainty by predicting sets of possible values for the target variable. CP formally guarantees that the actual value (true RUL) is covered by the predicted set with a degree of certainty that can be prespecified. We study three CP algorithms to conformalize any single-point RUL predictor and turn it into a valid interval predictor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-30T09:34:29Z)
• Dense Uncertainty Estimation [62.23555922631451]
  In this paper, we investigate neural networks and uncertainty estimation techniques to achieve both accurate deterministic prediction and reliable uncertainty estimation. We work on two types of uncertainty estimations solutions, namely ensemble based methods and generative model based methods, and explain their pros and cons while using them in fully/semi/weakly-supervised framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T01:23:48Z)
• Optimized conformal classification using gradient descent approximation [0.2538209532048866]
  Conformal predictors allow predictions to be made with a user-defined confidence level. We consider an approach to train the conformal predictor directly with maximum predictive efficiency. We test the method on several real world data sets and find that the method is promising.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-24T13:14:41Z)
• Private Prediction Sets [72.75711776601973]
  Machine learning systems need reliable uncertainty quantification and protection of individuals' privacy. We present a framework that treats these two desiderata jointly. We evaluate the method on large-scale computer vision datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-11T18:59:11Z)
• AutoCP: Automated Pipelines for Accurate Prediction Intervals [84.16181066107984]
  This paper proposes an AutoML framework called Automatic Machine Learning for Conformal Prediction (AutoCP) Unlike the familiar AutoML frameworks that attempt to select the best prediction model, AutoCP constructs prediction intervals that achieve the user-specified target coverage rate. We tested AutoCP on a variety of datasets and found that it significantly outperforms benchmark algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-24T23:13:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.