No More Distractions: an Adaptive Up-Sampling Algorithm to Reduce Data Artifacts

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.13907v1
• Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 02:54:53 GMT
• Title: No More Distractions: an Adaptive Up-Sampling Algorithm to Reduce Data Artifacts
• Authors: Han Chen
• Abstract summary: We analyzed SNLI data and visualized such spurious correlations. We proposed an adaptive up-sampling algorithm to correct the data artifacts. We did an experiment applying the algorithm to fix the data artifacts in SNLI data and the model trained with corrected data performed significantly better than the model trained with raw SNLI data.
• Score: 3.9777369380822956
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Researchers recently found out that sometimes language models achieve high accuracy on benchmark data set, but they can not generalize very well with even little changes to the original data set. This is sometimes due to data artifacts, model is learning the spurious correlation between tokens and labels, instead of the semantics and logic. In this work, we analyzed SNLI data and visualized such spurious correlations. We proposed an adaptive up-sampling algorithm to correct the data artifacts, which is simple and effective, and does not need human edits or annotation. We did an experiment applying the algorithm to fix the data artifacts in SNLI data and the model trained with corrected data performed significantly better than the model trained with raw SNLI data, overall, as well as on the subset we corrected.

Related papers

• Hey, That's My Data! Label-Only Dataset Inference in Large Language Models [63.35066172530291]
  CatShift is a label-only dataset-inference framework.<n>It capitalizes on catastrophic forgetting: the tendency of an LLM to overwrite previously learned knowledge when exposed to new data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T13:02:59Z)
• Dataset Cartography for Large Language Model Alignment: Mapping and Diagnosing Preference Data [12.113905795672899]
  Human preference data plays a critical role in aligning large language models with human values.<n>We introduce Alignment Data Map, a GPT-4o-assisted tool for analyzing and diagnosing preference data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T05:33:46Z)
• DUPRE: Data Utility Prediction for Efficient Data Valuation [49.60564885180563]
  Cooperative game theory-based data valuation, such as Data Shapley, requires evaluating the data utility and retraining the ML model for multiple data subsets. Our framework, textttDUPRE, takes an alternative yet complementary approach that reduces the cost per subset evaluation by predicting data utilities instead of evaluating them by model retraining. Specifically, given the evaluated data utilities of some data subsets, textttDUPRE fits a emphGaussian process (GP) regression model to predict the utility of every other data subset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-22T08:53:39Z)
• Approaching Metaheuristic Deep Learning Combos for Automated Data Mining [0.5419570023862531]
  This work proposes a means of combining meta-heuristic methods with conventional classifiers and neural networks in order to perform automated data mining. Experiments on the MNIST dataset for handwritten digit recognition were performed. It was empirically observed that using a ground truth labeled dataset's validation accuracy is inadequate for correcting labels of other previously unseen data instances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T10:28:22Z)
• When to Trust Your Data: Enhancing Dyna-Style Model-Based Reinforcement Learning With Data Filter [7.886307329450978]
  Dyna-style algorithms combine two approaches by using simulated data from an estimated environmental model to accelerate model-free training. Previous works address this issue by using model ensembles or pretraining the estimated model with data collected from the real environment. We introduce an out-of-distribution data filter that removes simulated data from the estimated model that significantly diverges from data collected in the real environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T01:49:03Z)
• Improving Grammatical Error Correction via Contextual Data Augmentation [49.746484518527716]
  We propose a synthetic data construction method based on contextual augmentation. Specifically, we combine rule-based substitution with model-based generation. We also propose a relabeling-based data cleaning method to mitigate the effects of noisy labels in synthetic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T10:49:56Z)
• From Data Deluge to Data Curation: A Filtering-WoRA Paradigm for Efficient Text-based Person Search [19.070305201045954]
  In text-based person search endeavors, data generation has emerged as a prevailing practice, addressing concerns over privacy preservation and the arduous task of manual annotation. We observe that only a subset of the data in constructed datasets plays a decisive role. We introduce a new Filtering-WoRA paradigm, which contains a filtering algorithm to identify this crucial data subset and WoRA learning strategy for light fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T05:29:14Z)
• Efficient Grammatical Error Correction Via Multi-Task Training and Optimized Training Schedule [55.08778142798106]
  We propose auxiliary tasks that exploit the alignment between the original and corrected sentences. We formulate each task as a sequence-to-sequence problem and perform multi-task training. We find that the order of datasets used for training and even individual instances within a dataset may have important effects on the final performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-20T14:50:12Z)
• Let's Synthesize Step by Step: Iterative Dataset Synthesis with Large Language Models by Extrapolating Errors from Small Models [69.76066070227452]
  *Data Synthesis* is a promising way to train a small model with very little labeled data. We propose *Synthesis Step by Step* (**S3**), a data synthesis framework that shrinks this distribution gap. Our approach improves the performance of a small model by reducing the gap between the synthetic dataset and the real data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T17:14:25Z)
• Synthetic data, real errors: how (not) to publish and use synthetic data [86.65594304109567]
  We show how the generative process affects the downstream ML task. We introduce Deep Generative Ensemble (DGE) to approximate the posterior distribution over the generative process model parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T07:30:29Z)
• Learning from aggregated data with a maximum entropy model [73.63512438583375]
  We show how a new model, similar to a logistic regression, may be learned from aggregated data only by approximating the unobserved feature distribution with a maximum entropy hypothesis. We present empirical evidence on several public datasets that the model learned this way can achieve performances comparable to those of a logistic model trained with the full unaggregated data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-05T09:17:27Z)
• Too Fine or Too Coarse? The Goldilocks Composition of Data Complexity for Robust Left-Right Eye-Tracking Classifiers [0.0]
  We train machine learning models utilizing a mixed dataset composed of both fine- and coarse-grain data. For our purposes, finer-grain data refers to data collected using more complex methods whereas coarser-grain data refers to data collected using more simple methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-24T23:18:08Z)
• Generating Data to Mitigate Spurious Correlations in Natural Language Inference Datasets [27.562256973255728]
  Natural language processing models often exploit spurious correlations between task-independent features and labels in datasets to perform well only within the distributions they are trained on. We propose to tackle this problem by generating a debiased version of a dataset, which can then be used to train a debiased, off-the-shelf model. Our approach consists of 1) a method for training data generators to generate high-quality, label-consistent data samples; and 2) a filtering mechanism for removing data points that contribute to spurious correlations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-24T09:08:05Z)
• Evaluating Prediction-Time Batch Normalization for Robustness under Covariate Shift [81.74795324629712]
  We call prediction-time batch normalization, which significantly improves model accuracy and calibration under covariate shift. We show that prediction-time batch normalization provides complementary benefits to existing state-of-the-art approaches for improving robustness. The method has mixed results when used alongside pre-training, and does not seem to perform as well under more natural types of dataset shift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-19T05:08:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.