Provably Stable Feature Rankings with SHAP and LIME

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.15800v2
• Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 00:49:43 GMT
• Title: Provably Stable Feature Rankings with SHAP and LIME
• Authors: Jeremy Goldwasser, Giles Hooker,
• Abstract summary: We devise attribution methods that ensure the most important features are ranked correctly with high probability. We introduce efficient sampling algorithms for SHAP and LIME that guarantee the $K$ highest-ranked features have the proper ordering.
• Score: 3.8642937395065124
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Feature attributions are ubiquitous tools for understanding the predictions of machine learning models. However, the calculation of popular methods for scoring input variables such as SHAP and LIME suffers from high instability due to random sampling. Leveraging ideas from multiple hypothesis testing, we devise attribution methods that ensure the most important features are ranked correctly with high probability. Given SHAP estimates from KernelSHAP or Shapley Sampling, we demonstrate how to retrospectively verify the number of stable rankings. Further, we introduce efficient sampling algorithms for SHAP and LIME that guarantee the $K$ highest-ranked features have the proper ordering. Finally, we show how to adapt these local feature attribution methods for the global importance setting.

Related papers

• Antithetic Sampling for Top-k Shapley Identification [19.221081896134567]
  The Shapley value's popularity in and outside of explainable AI stems from its axiomatic uniqueness. Most works investigate the uniform approximation of all features' Shapley values, needlessly consuming samples for insignificant features. In contrast, identifying the $k$ most important features can already be sufficiently insightful and yields the potential to leverage algorithmic opportunities connected to the field of multi-armed bandits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-02T15:38:32Z)
• Probably Approximately Precision and Recall Learning [62.912015491907994]
  Precision and Recall are foundational metrics in machine learning. One-sided feedback--where only positive examples are observed during training--is inherent in many practical problems. We introduce a PAC learning framework where each hypothesis is represented by a graph, with edges indicating positive interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-20T04:21:07Z)
• The Certainty Ratio $C_ρ$: a novel metric for assessing the reliability of classifier predictions [0.0]
  This paper introduces the Certainty Ratio ($C_rho$), a novel metric designed to quantify the contribution of confident (certain) versus uncertain predictions to any classification performance measure. Experimental results across 21 datasets and multiple classifiers, including Decision Trees, Naive-Bayes, 3-Nearest Neighbors, and Random Forests, demonstrate that $C_rho$rho reveals critical insights that conventional metrics often overlook.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T10:50:03Z)
• Bayesian Estimation and Tuning-Free Rank Detection for Probability Mass Function Tensors [17.640500920466984]
  This paper presents a novel framework for estimating the joint PMF and automatically inferring its rank from observed data. We derive a deterministic solution based on variational inference (VI) to approximate the posterior distributions of various model parameters. Additionally, we develop a scalable version of the VI-based approach by leveraging variational inference (SVI) Experiments involving both synthetic data and real movie recommendation data illustrate the advantages of our VI and SVI-based methods in terms of estimation accuracy, automatic rank detection, and computational efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T20:07:49Z)
• A Probabilistic Perspective on Unlearning and Alignment for Large Language Models [48.96686419141881]
  We introduce the first formal probabilistic evaluation framework for Large Language Models (LLMs) Namely, we propose novel metrics with high probability guarantees concerning the output distribution of a model. Our metrics are application-independent and allow practitioners to make more reliable estimates about model capabilities before deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T15:44:23Z)
• Provably Accurate Shapley Value Estimation via Leverage Score Sampling [12.201705893125775]
  We introduce Leverage SHAP, a light-weight modification of Kernel SHAP that provides provably accurate Shapley value estimates with just $O(nlog n)$ model evaluations. Our approach takes advantage of a connection between Shapley value estimation and active learning by employing leverage score sampling, a powerful regression tool.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T18:15:48Z)
• The Distributional Uncertainty of the SHAP score in Explainable Machine Learning [2.655371341356892]
  We propose a principled framework for reasoning on SHAP scores under unknown entity population distributions. We study the basic problems of finding maxima and minima of this function, which allows us to determine tight ranges for the SHAP scores of all features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-23T13:04:02Z)
• Online non-parametric likelihood-ratio estimation by Pearson-divergence functional minimization [55.98760097296213]
  We introduce a new framework for online non-parametric LRE (OLRE) for the setting where pairs of iid observations $(x_t sim p, x'_t sim q)$ are observed over time. We provide theoretical guarantees for the performance of the OLRE method along with empirical validation in synthetic experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T13:20:11Z)
• Fast Shapley Value Estimation: A Unified Approach [71.92014859992263]
  We propose a straightforward and efficient Shapley estimator, SimSHAP, by eliminating redundant techniques. In our analysis of existing approaches, we observe that estimators can be unified as a linear transformation of randomly summed values from feature subsets. Our experiments validate the effectiveness of our SimSHAP, which significantly accelerates the computation of accurate Shapley values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-02T06:09:24Z)
• Confident Feature Ranking [2.0564549686015594]
  We present a framework for quantifying the uncertainty in global importance values. We propose a novel method for the post-hoc interpretation of feature importance values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-28T07:23:01Z)
• Generalized Differentiable RANSAC [95.95627475224231]
  $nabla$-RANSAC is a differentiable RANSAC that allows learning the entire randomized robust estimation pipeline. $nabla$-RANSAC is superior to the state-of-the-art in terms of accuracy while running at a similar speed to its less accurate alternatives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-26T15:13:13Z)
• Don't Explain Noise: Robust Counterfactuals for Randomized Ensembles [50.81061839052459]
  We formalize the generation of robust counterfactual explanations as a probabilistic problem. We show the link between the robustness of ensemble models and the robustness of base learners. Our method achieves high robustness with only a small increase in the distance from counterfactual explanations to their initial observations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-27T17:28:54Z)
• Transformers Can Do Bayesian Inference [56.99390658880008]
  We present Prior-Data Fitted Networks (PFNs) PFNs leverage in-context learning in large-scale machine learning techniques to approximate a large set of posteriors. We demonstrate that PFNs can near-perfectly mimic Gaussian processes and also enable efficient Bayesian inference for intractable problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-20T13:07:39Z)
• On the Trustworthiness of Tree Ensemble Explainability Methods [0.9558392439655014]
  Feature importance methods (e.g. gain and SHAP) are among the most popular explainability methods used to address this need. For any explainability technique to be trustworthy and meaningful, it has to provide an explanation that is accurate and stable. We evaluate the accuracy and stability of global feature importance methods through comprehensive experiments done on simulations and four real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-30T20:56:37Z)
• Learning to Rank Anomalies: Scalar Performance Criteria and Maximization of Two-Sample Rank Statistics [0.0]
  We propose a data-driven scoring function defined on the feature space which reflects the degree of abnormality of the observations. This scoring function is learnt through a well-designed binary classification problem. We illustrate our methodology with preliminary encouraging numerical experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-20T14:45:56Z)
• Local policy search with Bayesian optimization [73.0364959221845]
  Reinforcement learning aims to find an optimal policy by interaction with an environment. Policy gradients for local search are often obtained from random perturbations. We develop an algorithm utilizing a probabilistic model of the objective function and its gradient.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-22T16:07:02Z)
• An Imprecise SHAP as a Tool for Explaining the Class Probability Distributions under Limited Training Data [5.8010446129208155]
  An imprecise SHAP is proposed for cases when the class probability distributions are imprecise and represented by sets of distributions. The first idea behind the imprecise SHAP is a new approach for computing the marginal contribution of a feature. The second idea is an attempt to consider a general approach to calculating and reducing interval-valued Shapley values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-16T20:30:26Z)
• Provably Efficient Reward-Agnostic Navigation with Linear Value Iteration [143.43658264904863]
  We show how iteration under a more standard notion of low inherent Bellman error, typically employed in least-square value-style algorithms, can provide strong PAC guarantees on learning a near optimal value function. We present a computationally tractable algorithm for the reward-free setting and show how it can be used to learn a near optimal policy for any (linear) reward function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-18T04:34:21Z)
• Towards Model-Agnostic Post-Hoc Adjustment for Balancing Ranking Fairness and Algorithm Utility [54.179859639868646]
  Bipartite ranking aims to learn a scoring function that ranks positive individuals higher than negative ones from labeled data. There have been rising concerns on whether the learned scoring function can cause systematic disparity across different protected groups. We propose a model post-processing framework for balancing them in the bipartite ranking scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T10:08:39Z)
• Causal Feature Selection for Algorithmic Fairness [61.767399505764736]
  We consider fairness in the integration component of data management. We propose an approach to identify a sub-collection of features that ensure the fairness of the dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-10T20:20:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.