Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Evidence from an Analysis of Institutional Policies and Guidelines

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01659v1
• Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 14:58:13 GMT
• Title: Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Evidence from an Analysis of Institutional Policies and Guidelines
• Authors: Nora McDonald, Aditya Johri, Areej Ali, Aayushi Hingle
• Abstract summary: ChatGPT in November 2022 prompted a massive uptake of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) across higher education institutions (HEIs) In the year since the release, HEIs have increasingly provided policies and guidelines to direct GenAI. This paper examined documents produced by 116 US universities categorized as high research activity or R1 institutions to understand GenAI related advice and guidance given to institutional stakeholders.
• Score: 4.438312734352056
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The release of ChatGPT in November 2022 prompted a massive uptake of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) across higher education institutions (HEIs). HEIs scrambled to respond to its use, especially by students, looking first to regulate it and then arguing for its productive integration within teaching and learning. In the year since the release, HEIs have increasingly provided policies and guidelines to direct GenAI. In this paper we examined documents produced by 116 US universities categorized as high research activity or R1 institutions to comprehensively understand GenAI related advice and guidance given to institutional stakeholders. Through an extensive analysis, we found the majority of universities (N=73, 63%) encourage the use of GenAI and many provide detailed guidance for its use in the classroom (N=48, 41%). More than half of all institutions provided sample syllabi (N=65, 56%) and half (N=58, 50%) provided sample GenAI curriculum and activities that would help instructors integrate and leverage GenAI in their classroom. Notably, most guidance for activities focused on writing, whereas code and STEM-related activities were mentioned half the time and vaguely even when they were (N=58, 50%). Finally, more than one half of institutions talked about the ethics of GenAI on a range of topics broadly, including Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) (N=60, 52%). Overall, based on our findings we caution that guidance for faculty can become burdensome as extensive revision of pedagogical approaches is often recommended in the policies.

Related papers

• Analysis of Generative AI Policies in Computing Course Syllabi [3.7869332128069773]
  Since the release of ChatGPT in 2022, Generative AI (GenAI) is increasingly being used in higher education computing classrooms across the U.S. We collected 98 computing course syllabi from 54 R1 institutions in the U.S. and studied the GenAI policies they adopted and the surrounding discourse. Our analysis shows that 1) most instructions related to GenAI use were as part of the academic integrity policy for the course and 2) most syllabi prohibited or restricted GenAI use, often warning students about the broader implications of using GenAI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-29T17:34:10Z)
• Could ChatGPT get an Engineering Degree? Evaluating Higher Education Vulnerability to AI Assistants [175.9723801486487]
  We evaluate whether two AI assistants, GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, can adequately answer assessment questions. GPT-4 answers an average of 65.8% of questions correctly, and can even produce the correct answer across at least one prompting strategy for 85.1% of questions. Our results call for revising program-level assessment design in higher education in light of advances in generative AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-07T12:11:49Z)
• A Systematic Review of Generative AI for Teaching and Learning Practice [0.37282630026096586]
  There are no agreed guidelines towards the usage of GenAI systems in higher education. There is a need for additional interdisciplinary, multidimensional studies in HE through collaboration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T18:16:27Z)
• Securing the Future of GenAI: Policy and Technology [50.586585729683776]
  Governments globally are grappling with the challenge of regulating GenAI, balancing innovation against safety. A workshop co-organized by Google, University of Wisconsin, Madison, and Stanford University aimed to bridge this gap between GenAI policy and technology. This paper summarizes the discussions during the workshop which addressed questions, such as: How regulation can be designed without hindering technological progress?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-21T20:30:01Z)
• Generative AI and Teachers -- For Us or Against Us? A Case Study [0.22499166814992438]
  Survey on adoption of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) by university teachers in their teaching activities. Results show that 35 teachers (more than half) use GenAI out of 67 respondents. 59% say it has impacted their teaching, however, 55% say there should be legislation around the use of GenAI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T14:40:07Z)
• Generative AI in Higher Education: Seeing ChatGPT Through Universities' Policies, Resources, and Guidelines [11.470910427306569]
  This study analyzes academic policies and guidelines established by top-ranked U.S. universities regarding the use of GenAI. Results show that the majority of these universities adopt an open but cautious approach towards GenAI. Findings provide four practical implications for educators in teaching practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-08T18:33:11Z)
• Xiezhi: An Ever-Updating Benchmark for Holistic Domain Knowledge Evaluation [61.56563631219381]
  We present Xiezhi, the most comprehensive evaluation suite designed to assess holistic domain knowledge. Xiezhi comprises multiple-choice questions across 516 diverse disciplines ranging from 13 different subjects with 249,587 questions and accompanied by Xiezhi- Specialty and Xiezhi-Interdiscipline, both with 15k questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-09T09:52:05Z)
• The AI generation gap: Are Gen Z students more interested in adopting generative AI such as ChatGPT in teaching and learning than their Gen X and Millennial Generation teachers? [0.0]
  Gen Z students were generally optimistic about the potential benefits of generative AI (GenAI) Gen X and Gen Y teachers expressed heightened concerns about overreliance, ethical and pedagogical implications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-04T14:42:06Z)
• Quiz Design Task: Helping Teachers Create Quizzes with Automated Question Generation [87.34509878569916]
  This paper focuses on the use case of helping teachers automate the generation of reading comprehension quizzes. In our study, teachers building a quiz receive question suggestions, which they can either accept or refuse with a reason.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-03T18:59:03Z)
• An Experience Report of Executive-Level Artificial Intelligence Education in the United Arab Emirates [53.04281982845422]
  We present an experience report of teaching an AI course to business executives in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Rather than focusing only on theoretical and technical aspects, we developed a course that teaches AI with a view to enabling students to understand how to incorporate it into existing business processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-02T20:59:53Z)
• Creation and Evaluation of a Pre-tertiary Artificial Intelligence (AI) Curriculum [58.86139968005518]
  The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK)-Jockey Club AI for the Future Project (AI4Future) co-created an AI curriculum for pre-tertiary education. A team of 14 professors with expertise in engineering and education collaborated with 17 principals and teachers from 6 secondary schools to co-create the curriculum. The co-creation process generated a variety of resources which enhanced the teachers knowledge in AI, as well as fostered teachers autonomy in bringing the subject matter into their classrooms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-19T11:26:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.