Analysis of Generative AI Policies in Computing Course Syllabi

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.22281v1
• Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 17:34:10 GMT
• Title: Analysis of Generative AI Policies in Computing Course Syllabi
• Authors: Areej Ali, Aayushi Hingle Collier, Umama Dewan, Nora McDonald, Aditya Johri,
• Abstract summary: Since the release of ChatGPT in 2022, Generative AI (GenAI) is increasingly being used in higher education computing classrooms across the U.S. We collected 98 computing course syllabi from 54 R1 institutions in the U.S. and studied the GenAI policies they adopted and the surrounding discourse. Our analysis shows that 1) most instructions related to GenAI use were as part of the academic integrity policy for the course and 2) most syllabi prohibited or restricted GenAI use, often warning students about the broader implications of using GenAI.
• Score: 3.7869332128069773
• License:
• Abstract: Since the release of ChatGPT in 2022, Generative AI (GenAI) is increasingly being used in higher education computing classrooms across the United States. While scholars have looked at overall institutional guidance for the use of GenAI and reports have documented the response from schools in the form of broad guidance to instructors, we do not know what policies and practices instructors are actually adopting and how they are being communicated to students through course syllabi. To study instructors' policy guidance, we collected 98 computing course syllabi from 54 R1 institutions in the U.S. and studied the GenAI policies they adopted and the surrounding discourse. Our analysis shows that 1) most instructions related to GenAI use were as part of the academic integrity policy for the course and 2) most syllabi prohibited or restricted GenAI use, often warning students about the broader implications of using GenAI, e.g. lack of veracity, privacy risks, and hindering learning. Beyond this, there was wide variation in how instructors approached GenAI including a focus on how to cite GenAI use, conceptualizing GenAI as an assistant, often in an anthropomorphic manner, and mentioning specific GenAI tools for use. We discuss the implications of our findings and conclude with current best practices for instructors.

Related papers

• Misconceptions, Pragmatism, and Value Tensions: Evaluating Students' Understanding and Perception of Generative AI for Education [0.11704154007740832]
  Students are early adopters of the technology, utilizing it in atypical ways. Students were asked to describe 1) their understanding of GenAI; 2) their use of GenAI; 3) their opinions on the benefits, downsides, and ethical issues pertaining to its use in education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-29T17:41:06Z)
• Hey GPT, Can You be More Racist? Analysis from Crowdsourced Attempts to Elicit Biased Content from Generative AI [41.96102438774773]
  This work presents the findings from a university-level competition, which challenged participants to design prompts for eliciting biased outputs from GenAI tools. We quantitatively and qualitatively analyze the competition submissions and identify a diverse set of biases in GenAI and strategies employed by participants to induce bias in GenAI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-20T18:44:45Z)
• Model-based Maintenance and Evolution with GenAI: A Look into the Future [47.93555901495955]
  We argue that Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) can be used as a means to address the limitations of Model-Based Engineering (MBM&E) We propose that GenAI can be used in MBM&E for: reducing engineers' learning curve, maximizing efficiency with recommendations, or serving as a reasoning tool to understand domain problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-09T23:13:26Z)
• Securing the Future of GenAI: Policy and Technology [50.586585729683776]
  Governments globally are grappling with the challenge of regulating GenAI, balancing innovation against safety. A workshop co-organized by Google, University of Wisconsin, Madison, and Stanford University aimed to bridge this gap between GenAI policy and technology. This paper summarizes the discussions during the workshop which addressed questions, such as: How regulation can be designed without hindering technological progress?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-21T20:30:01Z)
• Generative AI and Teachers -- For Us or Against Us? A Case Study [0.22499166814992438]
  Survey on adoption of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) by university teachers in their teaching activities. Results show that 35 teachers (more than half) use GenAI out of 67 respondents. 59% say it has impacted their teaching, however, 55% say there should be legislation around the use of GenAI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T14:40:07Z)
• Genetic Auto-prompt Learning for Pre-trained Code Intelligence Language Models [54.58108387797138]
  We investigate the effectiveness of prompt learning in code intelligence tasks. Existing automatic prompt design methods are very limited to code intelligence tasks. We propose Genetic Auto Prompt (GenAP) which utilizes an elaborate genetic algorithm to automatically design prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-20T13:37:00Z)
• Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Evidence from an Analysis of Institutional Policies and Guidelines [4.438312734352056]
  ChatGPT in November 2022 prompted a massive uptake of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) across higher education institutions (HEIs) In the year since the release, HEIs have increasingly provided policies and guidelines to direct GenAI. This paper examined documents produced by 116 US universities categorized as high research activity or R1 institutions to understand GenAI related advice and guidance given to institutional stakeholders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T14:58:13Z)
• Generative AI in Higher Education: Seeing ChatGPT Through Universities' Policies, Resources, and Guidelines [11.470910427306569]
  This study analyzes academic policies and guidelines established by top-ranked U.S. universities regarding the use of GenAI. Results show that the majority of these universities adopt an open but cautious approach towards GenAI. Findings provide four practical implications for educators in teaching practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-08T18:33:11Z)
• Identifying and Mitigating the Security Risks of Generative AI [179.2384121957896]
  This paper reports the findings of a workshop held at Google on the dual-use dilemma posed by GenAI. GenAI can be used just as well by attackers to generate new attacks and increase the velocity and efficacy of existing attacks. We discuss short-term and long-term goals for the community on this topic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-28T18:51:09Z)
• Innovating Computer Programming Pedagogy: The AI-Lab Framework for Generative AI Adoption [0.0]
  We introduce "AI-Lab," a framework for guiding students in effectively leveraging GenAI within core programming courses. By identifying and rectifying GenAI's errors, students enrich their learning process. For educators, AI-Lab provides mechanisms to explore students' perceptions of GenAI's role in their learning experience.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-23T17:20:37Z)
• Connecting Algorithmic Research and Usage Contexts: A Perspective of Contextualized Evaluation for Explainable AI [65.44737844681256]
  A lack of consensus on how to evaluate explainable AI (XAI) hinders the advancement of the field. We argue that one way to close the gap is to develop evaluation methods that account for different user requirements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-22T05:17:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.