Shifting social norms as a driving force for linguistic change: Struggles about language and gender in the German Bundestag

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.03887v1
• Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 10:49:28 GMT
• Title: Shifting social norms as a driving force for linguistic change: Struggles about language and gender in the German Bundestag
• Authors: Carolin M\"uller-Spitzer, Samira Ochs
• Abstract summary: We show that language and gender has been a recurring issue in the German Bundestag since the 1980s. We demonstrate how this is reflected in linguistic practices of the Bundestag. We will discuss implications of these earlier language battles for the currently very heated debate about gender-inclusive language.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This paper focuses on language change based on shifting social norms, in particular with regard to the debate on language and gender. It is a recurring argument in this debate that language develops "naturally" and that "severe interventions" - such as gender-inclusive language is often claimed to be - in the allegedly "organic" language system are inappropriate and even "dangerous". Such interventions are, however, not unprecedented. Socially motivated processes of language change are neither unusual nor new. We focus in our contribution on one important political-social space in Germany, the German Bundestag. Taking other struggles about language and gender in the plenaries of the Bundestag as a starting point, our article illustrates that language and gender has been a recurring issue in the German Bundestag since the 1980s. We demonstrate how this is reflected in linguistic practices of the Bundestag, by the use of a) designations for gays and lesbians; b) pair forms such as B\"urgerinnen und B\"urger (female and male citizens); and c) female forms of addresses and personal nouns ('Pr\"asidentin' in addition to 'Pr\"asident'). Lastly, we will discuss implications of these earlier language battles for the currently very heated debate about gender-inclusive language, especially regarding new forms with gender symbols like the asterisk or the colon (Lehrer*innen, Lehrer:innen; male*female teachers) which are intended to encompass all gender identities.

Related papers

• Beyond Binary Gender: Evaluating Gender-Inclusive Machine Translation with Ambiguous Attitude Words [85.48043537327258]
  Existing machine translation gender bias evaluations are primarily focused on male and female genders. This study presents a benchmark AmbGIMT (Gender-Inclusive Machine Translation with Ambiguous attitude words) We propose a novel process to evaluate gender bias based on the Emotional Attitude Score (EAS), which is used to quantify ambiguous attitude words.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T08:13:51Z)
• What an Elegant Bridge: Multilingual LLMs are Biased Similarly in Different Languages [51.0349882045866]
  This paper investigates biases of Large Language Models (LLMs) through the lens of grammatical gender. We prompt a model to describe nouns with adjectives in various languages, focusing specifically on languages with grammatical gender. We find that a simple classifier can not only predict noun gender above chance but also exhibit cross-language transferability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-12T22:10:16Z)
• Building Bridges: A Dataset for Evaluating Gender-Fair Machine Translation into German [17.924716793621627]
  We study gender-fair language in English-to-German machine translation (MT) We conduct the first benchmark study involving two commercial systems and six neural MT models. Our findings show that most systems produce mainly masculine forms and rarely gender-neutral variants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T09:39:19Z)
• A Multilingual Perspective on Probing Gender Bias [0.0]
  Gender bias is a form of systematic negative treatment that targets individuals based on their gender. This thesis investigates the nuances of how gender bias is expressed through language and within language technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-15T21:35:21Z)
• Less than one percent of words would be affected by gender-inclusive language in German press texts [43.16629507708997]
  We show that, on average, less than 1% of all tokens would be affected by gender-inclusive language. This small proportion calls into question whether gender-inclusive German presents a substantial barrier to understanding and learning the language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T10:32:34Z)
• "I'm fully who I am": Towards Centering Transgender and Non-Binary Voices to Measure Biases in Open Language Generation [69.25368160338043]
  Transgender and non-binary (TGNB) individuals disproportionately experience discrimination and exclusion from daily life. We assess how the social reality surrounding experienced marginalization of TGNB persons contributes to and persists within Open Language Generation. We introduce TANGO, a dataset of template-based real-world text curated from a TGNB-oriented community.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-17T04:21:45Z)
• Transcending the "Male Code": Implicit Masculine Biases in NLP Contexts [10.036312061637764]
  Critical scholarship has elevated the problem of gender bias in data sets used to train virtual assistants (VAs) We examined two natural language processing (NLP) data sets. We found that when gendered language was present, so were gender biases and especially masculine biases. We offer a new dictionary called AVA that covers ambiguous associations between gendered language and the language of VAs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-22T03:53:24Z)
• How Conservative are Language Models? Adapting to the Introduction of Gender-Neutral Pronouns [0.15293427903448023]
  We show that gender-neutral pronouns (in Swedish) are not associated with human processing difficulties. We show that gender-neutral pronouns in Danish, English, and Swedish are associated with higher perplexity, more dispersed attention patterns, and worse downstream performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T09:42:02Z)
• Quantifying Gender Bias Towards Politicians in Cross-Lingual Language Models [104.41668491794974]
  We quantify the usage of adjectives and verbs generated by language models surrounding the names of politicians as a function of their gender. We find that while some words such as dead, and designated are associated with both male and female politicians, a few specific words such as beautiful and divorced are predominantly associated with female politicians.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-15T15:03:26Z)
• They, Them, Theirs: Rewriting with Gender-Neutral English [56.14842450974887]
  We perform a case study on the singular they, a common way to promote gender inclusion in English. We show how a model can be trained to produce gender-neutral English with 1% word error rate with no human-labeled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-12T21:47:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.