Trust the Process: Zero-Knowledge Machine Learning to Enhance Trust in Generative AI Interactions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.06414v1
• Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 14:00:16 GMT
• Title: Trust the Process: Zero-Knowledge Machine Learning to Enhance Trust in Generative AI Interactions
• Authors: Bianca-Mihaela Ganescu, Jonathan Passerat-Palmbach
• Abstract summary: It explores using cryptographic techniques, particularly Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs), to address concerns regarding performance fairness and accuracy. Applying ZKPs to Machine Learning models, known as ZKML (Zero-Knowledge Machine Learning), enables independent validation of AI-generated content. We introduce snarkGPT, a practical ZKML implementation for transformers, to empower users to verify output accuracy and quality while preserving model privacy.
• Score: 1.3688201404977818
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Generative AI, exemplified by models like transformers, has opened up new possibilities in various domains but also raised concerns about fairness, transparency and reliability, especially in fields like medicine and law. This paper emphasizes the urgency of ensuring fairness and quality in these domains through generative AI. It explores using cryptographic techniques, particularly Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs), to address concerns regarding performance fairness and accuracy while protecting model privacy. Applying ZKPs to Machine Learning models, known as ZKML (Zero-Knowledge Machine Learning), enables independent validation of AI-generated content without revealing sensitive model information, promoting transparency and trust. ZKML enhances AI fairness by providing cryptographic audit trails for model predictions and ensuring uniform performance across users. We introduce snarkGPT, a practical ZKML implementation for transformers, to empower users to verify output accuracy and quality while preserving model privacy. We present a series of empirical results studying snarkGPT's scalability and performance to assess the feasibility and challenges of adopting a ZKML-powered approach to capture quality and performance fairness problems in generative AI models.

Related papers

• PseudoNeg-MAE: Self-Supervised Point Cloud Learning using Conditional Pseudo-Negative Embeddings [55.55445978692678]
  PseudoNeg-MAE is a self-supervised learning framework that enhances global feature representation of point cloud mask autoencoders. We show that PseudoNeg-MAE achieves state-of-the-art performance on the ModelNet40 and ScanObjectNN datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-24T07:57:21Z)
• Design of reliable technology valuation model with calibrated machine learning of patent indicators [14.31250748501038]
  We propose an analytical framework for reliable technology valuation using calibrated ML models. We extract quantitative patent indicators that represent various technology characteristics as input data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-08T11:52:37Z)
• SHIELD: A regularization technique for eXplainable Artificial Intelligence [9.658282892513386]
  This paper introduces SHIELD (Selective Hidden Input Evaluation for Learning Dynamics), a regularization technique for explainable artificial intelligence. In contrast to conventional approaches, SHIELD regularization seamlessly integrates into the objective function, enhancing model explainability while also improving performance. Experimental validation on benchmark datasets underscores SHIELD's effectiveness in improving Artificial Intelligence model explainability and overall performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-03T09:56:38Z)
• LaPLACE: Probabilistic Local Model-Agnostic Causal Explanations [1.0370398945228227]
  We introduce LaPLACE-explainer, designed to provide probabilistic cause-and-effect explanations for machine learning models. The LaPLACE-Explainer component leverages the concept of a Markov blanket to establish statistical boundaries between relevant and non-relevant features. Our approach offers causal explanations and outperforms LIME and SHAP in terms of local accuracy and consistency of explained features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-01T04:09:59Z)
• Federated Learning-Empowered AI-Generated Content in Wireless Networks [58.48381827268331]
  Federated learning (FL) can be leveraged to improve learning efficiency and achieve privacy protection for AIGC. We present FL-based techniques for empowering AIGC, and aim to enable users to generate diverse, personalized, and high-quality content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-14T04:13:11Z)
• Evaluating Explainability in Machine Learning Predictions through Explainer-Agnostic Metrics [0.0]
  We develop six distinct model-agnostic metrics designed to quantify the extent to which model predictions can be explained. These metrics measure different aspects of model explainability, ranging from local importance, global importance, and surrogate predictions. We demonstrate the practical utility of these metrics on classification and regression tasks, and integrate these metrics into an existing Python package for public use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T15:28:36Z)
• Information Theoretic Evaluation of Privacy-Leakage, Interpretability, and Transferability for a Novel Trustworthy AI Framework [11.764605963190817]
  Guidelines and principles of trustworthy AI should be adhered to in practice during the development of AI systems. This work suggests a novel information theoretic trustworthy AI framework based on the hypothesis that information theory enables taking into account the ethical AI principles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-06T09:47:06Z)
• Federated Learning with Unreliable Clients: Performance Analysis and Mechanism Design [76.29738151117583]
  Federated Learning (FL) has become a promising tool for training effective machine learning models among distributed clients. However, low quality models could be uploaded to the aggregator server by unreliable clients, leading to a degradation or even a collapse of training. We model these unreliable behaviors of clients and propose a defensive mechanism to mitigate such a security risk.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T08:02:27Z)
• Uncertainty as a Form of Transparency: Measuring, Communicating, and Using Uncertainty [66.17147341354577]
  We argue for considering a complementary form of transparency by estimating and communicating the uncertainty associated with model predictions. We describe how uncertainty can be used to mitigate model unfairness, augment decision-making, and build trustworthy systems. This work constitutes an interdisciplinary review drawn from literature spanning machine learning, visualization/HCI, design, decision-making, and fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-15T17:26:14Z)
• Trustworthy AI [75.99046162669997]
  Brittleness to minor adversarial changes in the input data, ability to explain the decisions, address the bias in their training data, are some of the most prominent limitations. We propose the tutorial on Trustworthy AI to address six critical issues in enhancing user and public trust in AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-02T20:04:18Z)
• Transfer Learning without Knowing: Reprogramming Black-box Machine Learning Models with Scarce Data and Limited Resources [78.72922528736011]
  We propose a novel approach, black-box adversarial reprogramming (BAR), that repurposes a well-trained black-box machine learning model. Using zeroth order optimization and multi-label mapping techniques, BAR can reprogram a black-box ML model solely based on its input-output responses. BAR outperforms state-of-the-art methods and yields comparable performance to the vanilla adversarial reprogramming method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-17T01:52:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.