Confronting Reward Overoptimization for Diffusion Models: A Perspective of Inductive and Primacy Biases

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.08552v2
• Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 17:36:47 GMT
• Title: Confronting Reward Overoptimization for Diffusion Models: A Perspective of Inductive and Primacy Biases
• Authors: Ziyi Zhang, Sen Zhang, Yibing Zhan, Yong Luo, Yonggang Wen, Dacheng Tao,
• Abstract summary: Bridging the gap between diffusion models and human preferences is crucial for their integration into practical generative. We propose Temporal Diffusion Policy Optimization with critic active neuron Reset (TDPO-R), a policy gradient algorithm that exploits the temporal inductive bias of diffusion models. Empirical results demonstrate the superior efficacy of our methods in mitigating reward overoptimization.
• Score: 76.9127853906115
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Bridging the gap between diffusion models and human preferences is crucial for their integration into practical generative workflows. While optimizing downstream reward models has emerged as a promising alignment strategy, concerns arise regarding the risk of excessive optimization with learned reward models, which potentially compromises ground-truth performance. In this work, we confront the reward overoptimization problem in diffusion model alignment through the lenses of both inductive and primacy biases. We first identify a mismatch between current methods and the temporal inductive bias inherent in the multi-step denoising process of diffusion models, as a potential source of reward overoptimization. Then, we surprisingly discover that dormant neurons in our critic model act as a regularization against reward overoptimization while active neurons reflect primacy bias. Motivated by these observations, we propose Temporal Diffusion Policy Optimization with critic active neuron Reset (TDPO-R), a policy gradient algorithm that exploits the temporal inductive bias of diffusion models and mitigates the primacy bias stemming from active neurons. Empirical results demonstrate the superior efficacy of our methods in mitigating reward overoptimization. Code is avaliable at https://github.com/ZiyiZhang27/tdpo.

Related papers

• Fine-Tuning Discrete Diffusion Models via Reward Optimization with Applications to DNA and Protein Design [56.957070405026194]
  We propose an algorithm that enables direct backpropagation of rewards through entire trajectories generated by diffusion models. DRAKES can generate sequences that are both natural-like and yield high rewards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T15:10:13Z)
• Training-free Diffusion Model Alignment with Sampling Demons [15.400553977713914]
  We propose an optimization approach, dubbed Demon, to guide the denoising process at inference time without backpropagation through reward functions or model retraining. Our approach works by controlling noise distribution in denoising steps to concentrate density on regions corresponding to high rewards through optimization. To the best of our knowledge, the proposed approach is the first inference-time, backpropagation-free preference alignment method for diffusion models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T07:33:49Z)
• Self-Evolutionary Large Language Models through Uncertainty-Enhanced Preference Optimization [9.618391485742968]
  Iterative preference optimization has recently become one of the de-facto training paradigms for large language models (LLMs) We present an uncertainty-enhanced textbfPreference textbfOptimization framework to make the LLM self-evolve with reliable feedback. Our framework substantially alleviates the noisy problem and improves the performance of iterative preference optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-17T14:05:58Z)
• Bridging Model-Based Optimization and Generative Modeling via Conservative Fine-Tuning of Diffusion Models [54.132297393662654]
  We introduce a hybrid method that fine-tunes cutting-edge diffusion models by optimizing reward models through RL. We demonstrate the capability of our approach to outperform the best designs in offline data, leveraging the extrapolation capabilities of reward models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T03:57:29Z)
• Inference-Time Alignment of Diffusion Models with Direct Noise Optimization [45.77751895345154]
  We propose a novel alignment approach, named Direct Noise Optimization (DNO), that optimize the injected noise during the sampling process of diffusion models. By design, DNO operates at inference-time, and thus is tuning-free and prompt-agnostic, with the alignment occurring in an online fashion during generation. We conduct extensive experiments on several important reward functions and demonstrate that the proposed DNO approach can achieve state-of-the-art reward scores within a reasonable time budget for generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T08:39:39Z)
• Data Attribution for Diffusion Models: Timestep-induced Bias in Influence Estimation [53.27596811146316]
  Diffusion models operate over a sequence of timesteps instead of instantaneous input-output relationships in previous contexts. We present Diffusion-TracIn that incorporates this temporal dynamics and observe that samples' loss gradient norms are highly dependent on timestep. We introduce Diffusion-ReTrac as a re-normalized adaptation that enables the retrieval of training samples more targeted to the test sample of interest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-17T07:58:18Z)
• Fast Diffusion EM: a diffusion model for blind inverse problems with application to deconvolution [0.0]
  Current methods assume the degradation to be known and provide impressive results in terms of restoration and diversity. In this work, we leverage the efficiency of those models to jointly estimate the restored image and unknown parameters of the kernel model. Our method alternates between approximating the expected log-likelihood of the problem using samples drawn from a diffusion model and a step to estimate unknown model parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-01T06:47:13Z)
• How Much is Enough? A Study on Diffusion Times in Score-based Generative Models [76.76860707897413]
  Current best practice advocates for a large T to ensure that the forward dynamics brings the diffusion sufficiently close to a known and simple noise distribution. We show how an auxiliary model can be used to bridge the gap between the ideal and the simulated forward dynamics, followed by a standard reverse diffusion process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-10T15:09:46Z)
• Model-agnostic bias mitigation methods with regressor distribution control for Wasserstein-based fairness metrics [0.6509758931804478]
  We propose a bias mitigation methodology based upon the construction of post-processed models with fairer regressor distributions. Our novel methodology performs optimization in low-dimensional spaces and avoids expensive model retraining.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-19T17:31:22Z)
• Loss function based second-order Jensen inequality and its application to particle variational inference [112.58907653042317]
  Particle variational inference (PVI) uses an ensemble of models as an empirical approximation for the posterior distribution. PVI iteratively updates each model with a repulsion force to ensure the diversity of the optimized models. We derive a novel generalization error bound and show that it can be reduced by enhancing the diversity of models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-09T12:13:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.