Is Epistemic Uncertainty Faithfully Represented by Evidential Deep Learning Methods?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.09056v3
• Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 20:54:39 GMT
• Title: Is Epistemic Uncertainty Faithfully Represented by Evidential Deep Learning Methods?
• Authors: Mira Jürgens, Nis Meinert, Viktor Bengs, Eyke Hüllermeier, Willem Waegeman,
• Abstract summary: This paper presents novel theoretical insights of evidential deep learning. It highlights the difficulties in optimizing second-order loss functions. It provides novel insights into issues of identifiability and convergence in second-order loss minimization.
• Score: 26.344949402398917
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Trustworthy ML systems should not only return accurate predictions, but also a reliable representation of their uncertainty. Bayesian methods are commonly used to quantify both aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty, but alternative approaches, such as evidential deep learning methods, have become popular in recent years. The latter group of methods in essence extends empirical risk minimization (ERM) for predicting second-order probability distributions over outcomes, from which measures of epistemic (and aleatoric) uncertainty can be extracted. This paper presents novel theoretical insights of evidential deep learning, highlighting the difficulties in optimizing second-order loss functions and interpreting the resulting epistemic uncertainty measures. With a systematic setup that covers a wide range of approaches for classification, regression and counts, it provides novel insights into issues of identifiability and convergence in second-order loss minimization, and the relative (rather than absolute) nature of epistemic uncertainty measures.

Related papers

• A unified uncertainty-aware exploration: Combining epistemic and aleatory uncertainty [21.139502047972684]
  We propose an algorithm that quantifies the combined effect of aleatory and epistemic uncertainty for risk-sensitive exploration. Our method builds on a novel extension of distributional RL that estimates a parameterized return distribution. Experimental results on tasks with exploration and risk challenges show that our method outperforms alternative approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-05T17:39:00Z)
• One step closer to unbiased aleatoric uncertainty estimation [71.55174353766289]
  We propose a new estimation method by actively de-noising the observed data. By conducting a broad range of experiments, we demonstrate that our proposed approach provides a much closer approximation to the actual data uncertainty than the standard method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-16T14:59:11Z)
• Ensemble Neural Networks for Remaining Useful Life (RUL) Prediction [0.39287497907611874]
  A core part of maintenance planning is a monitoring system that provides a good prognosis on health and degradation. Here, we propose ensemble neural networks for probabilistic RUL predictions which considers both uncertainties and decouples these two uncertainties. This method is tested on NASA's turbofan jet engine CMAPSS data-set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-21T19:38:44Z)
• On Second-Order Scoring Rules for Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification [8.298716599039501]
  We show that there seems to be no loss function that provides an incentive for a second-order learner to faithfully represent its uncertainty. As a main mathematical tool to prove this result, we introduce the generalised notion of second-order scoring rules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-30T08:59:45Z)
• Uncertainty Quantification for Traffic Forecasting: A Unified Approach [21.556559649467328]
  Uncertainty is an essential consideration for time series forecasting tasks. In this work, we focus on quantifying the uncertainty of traffic forecasting. We develop Deep S-Temporal Uncertainty Quantification (STUQ), which can estimate both aleatoric and relational uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-11T15:21:53Z)
• The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Evidential Regression [72.30888739450343]
  A new approach with uncertainty-aware regression-based neural networks (NNs) shows promise over traditional deterministic methods and typical Bayesian NNs. We detail the theoretical shortcomings and analyze the performance on synthetic and real-world data sets, showing that Deep Evidential Regression is a quantification rather than an exact uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T10:10:32Z)
• On the Difficulty of Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification in Machine Learning: The Case of Direct Uncertainty Estimation through Loss Minimisation [8.298716599039501]
  Uncertainty quantification has received increasing attention in machine learning. The latter refers to the learner's (lack of) knowledge and appears to be especially difficult to measure and quantify. We show that loss minimisation does not work for second-order predictors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-11T17:26:05Z)
• Dense Uncertainty Estimation via an Ensemble-based Conditional Latent Variable Model [68.34559610536614]
  We argue that the aleatoric uncertainty is an inherent attribute of the data and can only be correctly estimated with an unbiased oracle model. We propose a new sampling and selection strategy at train time to approximate the oracle model for aleatoric uncertainty estimation. Our results show that our solution achieves both accurate deterministic results and reliable uncertainty estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-22T08:54:10Z)
• DEUP: Direct Epistemic Uncertainty Prediction [56.087230230128185]
  Epistemic uncertainty is part of out-of-sample prediction error due to the lack of knowledge of the learner. We propose a principled approach for directly estimating epistemic uncertainty by learning to predict generalization error and subtracting an estimate of aleatoric uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-16T23:50:35Z)
• The Hidden Uncertainty in a Neural Networks Activations [105.4223982696279]
  The distribution of a neural network's latent representations has been successfully used to detect out-of-distribution (OOD) data. This work investigates whether this distribution correlates with a model's epistemic uncertainty, thus indicating its ability to generalise to novel inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-05T17:30:35Z)
• Learning to Predict Error for MRI Reconstruction [67.76632988696943]
  We demonstrate that predictive uncertainty estimated by the current methods does not highly correlate with prediction error. We propose a novel method that estimates the target labels and magnitude of the prediction error in two steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-13T15:55:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.