Word Embeddings Revisited: Do LLMs Offer Something New?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.11094v2
• Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2024 14:01:04 GMT
• Title: Word Embeddings Revisited: Do LLMs Offer Something New?
• Authors: Matthew Freestone and Shubhra Kanti Karmaker Santu
• Abstract summary: Learning meaningful word embeddings is key to training a robust language model. The recent rise of Large Language Models (LLMs) has provided us with many new word/sentence/document embedding models.
• Score: 2.822851601000061
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Learning meaningful word embeddings is key to training a robust language model. The recent rise of Large Language Models (LLMs) has provided us with many new word/sentence/document embedding models. Although LLMs have shown remarkable advancement in various NLP tasks, it is still unclear whether the performance improvement is merely because of scale or whether underlying embeddings they produce significantly differ from classical encoding models like Sentence-BERT (SBERT) or Universal Sentence Encoder (USE). This paper systematically investigates this issue by comparing classical word embedding techniques against LLM-based word embeddings in terms of their latent vector semantics. Our results show that LLMs tend to cluster semantically related words more tightly than classical models. LLMs also yield higher average accuracy on the Bigger Analogy Test Set (BATS) over classical methods. Finally, some LLMs tend to produce word embeddings similar to SBERT, a relatively lighter classical model.

Related papers

• Evaluating how LLM annotations represent diverse views on contentious topics [3.405231040967506]
  We show how generative large language models (LLMs) represent diverse viewpoints on contentious labeling tasks. Our findings suggest that when using LLMs to annotate data, under-representing the views of particular groups is not a substantial concern.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-29T22:53:15Z)
• Revisiting Word Embeddings in the LLM Era [0.2999888908665658]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently shown remarkable advancement in various NLP tasks. We compare classical decontextualized and contextualized word embeddings with the same for LLM-induced embeddings. Our results show that LLMs cluster semantically related words more tightly and perform better on analogy tasks in decontextualized settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T22:45:08Z)
• Refining Sentence Embedding Model through Ranking Sentences Generation with Large Language Models [60.00178316095646]
  Sentence embedding is essential for many NLP tasks, with contrastive learning methods achieving strong performance using datasets like NLI. Recent studies leverage large language models (LLMs) to generate sentence pairs, reducing annotation dependency. We propose a method for controlling the generation direction of LLMs in the latent space. Unlike unconstrained generation, the controlled approach ensures meaningful semantic divergence. Experiments on multiple benchmarks demonstrate that our method achieves new SOTA performance with a modest cost in ranking sentence synthesis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T12:07:53Z)
• Idiosyncrasies in Large Language Models [54.26923012617675]
  We unveil and study idiosyncrasies in Large Language Models (LLMs) We find that fine-tuning existing text embedding models on LLM-generated texts yields excellent classification accuracy. We leverage LLM as judges to generate detailed, open-ended descriptions of each model's idiosyncrasies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T18:59:02Z)
• AlphaPruning: Using Heavy-Tailed Self Regularization Theory for Improved Layer-wise Pruning of Large Language Models [94.82766517752418]
  We propose AlphaPruning, which uses shape metrics to allocate layerwise sparsity ratios in a more theoretically principled manner. Our results show that AlphaPruning prunes LLaMA-7B to 80% sparsity while maintaining reasonable perplexity, marking a first in the literature on LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T03:35:11Z)
• From Tokens to Words: On the Inner Lexicon of LLMs [7.148628740938674]
  Natural language is composed of words, but modern LLMs process sub-words as input. We present evidence that LLMs engage in an intrinsic detokenization process, where sub-word sequences are combined into coherent word representations. Our findings suggest that LLMs maintain a latent vocabulary beyond the tokenizer's scope.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T09:53:35Z)
• Rethinking Semantic Parsing for Large Language Models: Enhancing LLM Performance with Semantic Hints [20.844061807562436]
  We propose SENSE, a novel prompting approach that embeds semantic hints within the prompt. Experiments show that SENSE consistently improves LLMs' performance across various tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-22T14:35:09Z)
• LAMPO: Large Language Models as Preference Machines for Few-shot Ordinal Classification [34.9210323553677]
  We introduce LAMPO, a novel paradigm that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) for solving few-shot multi-class ordinal classification tasks. Extensive experiments on seven public datasets demonstrate LAMPO's remarkably competitive performance across a diverse spectrum of applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-06T15:55:05Z)
• Analyzing the Role of Semantic Representations in the Era of Large Language Models [104.18157036880287]
  We investigate the role of semantic representations in the era of large language models (LLMs) We propose an AMR-driven chain-of-thought prompting method, which we call AMRCoT. We find that it is difficult to predict which input examples AMR may help or hurt on, but errors tend to arise with multi-word expressions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T17:32:59Z)
• Fantastic Semantics and Where to Find Them: Investigating Which Layers of Generative LLMs Reflect Lexical Semantics [50.982315553104975]
  We investigate the bottom-up evolution of lexical semantics for a popular large language model, namely Llama2. Our experiments show that the representations in lower layers encode lexical semantics, while the higher layers, with weaker semantic induction, are responsible for prediction. This is in contrast to models with discriminative objectives, such as mask language modeling, where the higher layers obtain better lexical semantics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-03T13:14:47Z)
• Supervised Knowledge Makes Large Language Models Better In-context Learners [94.89301696512776]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit emerging in-context learning abilities through prompt engineering. The challenge of improving the generalizability and factuality of LLMs in natural language understanding and question answering remains under-explored. We propose a framework that enhances the reliability of LLMs as it: 1) generalizes out-of-distribution data, 2) elucidates how LLMs benefit from discriminative models, and 3) minimizes hallucinations in generative tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-26T07:24:46Z)
• Making Large Language Models A Better Foundation For Dense Retrieval [19.38740248464456]
  Dense retrieval needs to learn discriminative text embeddings to represent the semantic relationship between query and document. It may benefit from the using of large language models (LLMs), given LLMs' strong capability on semantic understanding. We propose LLaRA (LLM adapted for dense RetrievAl), which works as a post-hoc adaptation of dense retrieval application.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-24T15:10:35Z)
• The Ups and Downs of Large Language Model Inference with Vocabulary Trimming by Language Heuristics [74.99898531299148]
  This research examines vocabulary trimming (VT) inspired by restricting embedding entries to the language of interest to bolster time and memory efficiency. We apply two languages to trim the full vocabulary - Unicode-based script filtering and corpus-based selection - to different language families and sizes. It is found that VT reduces the memory usage of small models by nearly 50% and has an upper bound of 25% improvement in generation speed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T09:35:50Z)
• BeLLM: Backward Dependency Enhanced Large Language Model for Sentence Embeddings [4.545354973721937]
  We propose a novel model: backward dependency enhanced large language model (BeLLM) It learns sentence embeddings via transforming specific attention layers from uni- to bi-directional. It shows that auto-regressive LLMs benefit from backward dependencies for sentence embeddings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-09T11:53:52Z)
• CoAnnotating: Uncertainty-Guided Work Allocation between Human and Large Language Models for Data Annotation [94.59630161324013]
  We propose CoAnnotating, a novel paradigm for Human-LLM co-annotation of unstructured texts at scale. Our empirical study shows CoAnnotating to be an effective means to allocate work from results on different datasets, with up to 21% performance improvement over random baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T08:56:49Z)
• Scaling Sentence Embeddings with Large Language Models [43.19994568210206]
  In this work, we propose an in-context learning-based method aimed at improving sentence embeddings performance. Our approach involves adapting the previous prompt-based representation method for autoregressive models. By scaling model size, we find scaling to more than tens of billion parameters harms the performance on semantic textual similarity tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-31T13:26:03Z)
• Waffling around for Performance: Visual Classification with Random Words and Broad Concepts [121.60918966567657]
  WaffleCLIP is a framework for zero-shot visual classification which simply replaces LLM-generated descriptors with random character and word descriptors. We conduct an extensive experimental study on the impact and shortcomings of additional semantics introduced with LLM-generated descriptors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-12T17:59:48Z)
• Always Keep your Target in Mind: Studying Semantics and Improving Performance of Neural Lexical Substitution [124.99894592871385]
  We present a large-scale comparative study of lexical substitution methods employing both old and most recent language models. We show that already competitive results achieved by SOTA LMs/MLMs can be further substantially improved if information about the target word is injected properly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-07T16:16:19Z)
• Future Vector Enhanced LSTM Language Model for LVCSR [67.03726018635174]
  This paper proposes a novel enhanced long short-term memory (LSTM) LM using the future vector. Experiments show that, the proposed new LSTM LM gets a better result on BLEU scores for long term sequence prediction. Rescoring using both the new and conventional LSTM LMs can achieve a very large improvement on the word error rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-31T08:38:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.