Evaluating Perceptual Distance Models by Fitting Binomial Distributions to Two-Alternative Forced Choice Data
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.10390v4
- Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2025 19:35:52 GMT
- Title: Evaluating Perceptual Distance Models by Fitting Binomial Distributions to Two-Alternative Forced Choice Data
- Authors: Alexander Hepburn, Raul Santos-Rodriguez, Javier Portilla,
- Abstract summary: This paper introduces a more robust distance-model evaluation method using a pure probabilistic approach, applying maximum likelihood estimation to a binomial decision model.<n>Our method demonstrates superior simplicity, interpretability, flexibility, and computational efficiency, as shown through evaluations of various visual distance models on two 2AFC PF datasets.
- Score: 43.714290271351466
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The Two Alternative Forced Choice (2AFC) paradigm offers advantages over the Mean Opinion Score (MOS) paradigm in psychophysics (PF), such as simplicity and robustness. However, when evaluating perceptual distance models, MOS enables direct correlation between model predictions and PF data. In contrast, 2AFC only allows pairwise comparisons to be converted into a quality ranking similar to MOS when comparisons include shared images. In large datasets, like BAPPS, where image patches and distortions are combined randomly, deriving rankings from 2AFC PF data becomes infeasible, as distorted images included in each comparisons are independent. To address this, instead of relying on MOS correlation, researchers have trained ad-hoc neural networks to reproduce 2AFC PF data based on pairs of model distances - a black-box approach with conceptual and operational limitations. This paper introduces a more robust distance-model evaluation method using a pure probabilistic approach, applying maximum likelihood estimation to a binomial decision model. Our method demonstrates superior simplicity, interpretability, flexibility, and computational efficiency, as shown through evaluations of various visual distance models on two 2AFC PF datasets.
Related papers
- LatentFM: A Latent Flow Matching Approach for Generative Medical Image Segmentation [0.0]
We propose LatentFM, a flow-based model operating in the latent space for medical image segmentation.<n>By sampling multiple latent representations, our method synthesizes diverse segmentation outputs.<n>Our approach achieves superior segmentation accuracy while remaining highly efficient in the latent space.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-04T14:06:08Z) - FedAPM: Federated Learning via ADMM with Partial Model Personalization [12.72555825043549]
In federated learning (FL), the assumption that datasets from different devices are independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) often does not hold due to user differences.<n>We propose an FL framework based on the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM), referred to as FedAPM, to mitigate client drift.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-05T06:38:29Z) - Calibrated Multi-Preference Optimization for Aligning Diffusion Models [90.15024547673785]
Calibrated Preference Optimization (CaPO) is a novel method to align text-to-image (T2I) diffusion models.<n>CaPO incorporates the general preference from multiple reward models without human annotated data.<n> Experimental results show that CaPO consistently outperforms prior methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-04T18:59:23Z) - Reducing Semantic Ambiguity In Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentation Via Probabilistic Prototypical Pixel Contrast [7.092718945468069]
Domain adaptation aims to reduce the model degradation on the target domain caused by the domain shift between the source and target domains.
Probabilistic proto-typical pixel contrast (PPPC) is a universal adaptation framework that models each pixel embedding as a probability.
PPPC not only helps to address ambiguity at the pixel level, yielding discriminative representations but also significant improvements in both synthetic-to-real and day-to-night adaptation tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-27T08:25:03Z) - Discriminative Estimation of Total Variation Distance: A Fidelity Auditor for Generative Data [10.678533056953784]
We propose a discriminative approach to estimate the total variation (TV) distance between two distributions.
Our method quantitatively characterizes the relation between the Bayes risk in classifying two distributions and their TV distance.
We demonstrate that, with a specific choice of hypothesis class in classification, a fast convergence rate in estimating the TV distance can be achieved.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-24T08:18:09Z) - Collaborative Heterogeneous Causal Inference Beyond Meta-analysis [68.4474531911361]
We propose a collaborative inverse propensity score estimator for causal inference with heterogeneous data.
Our method shows significant improvements over the methods based on meta-analysis when heterogeneity increases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-24T09:04:36Z) - Doubly Calibrated Estimator for Recommendation on Data Missing Not At
Random [20.889464448762176]
We argue that existing estimators rely on miscalibrated imputed errors and propensity scores.
We propose a Doubly Calibrated Estimator that involves the calibration of both the imputation and propensity models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-26T05:08:52Z) - Robust Training of Federated Models with Extremely Label Deficiency [84.00832527512148]
Federated semi-supervised learning (FSSL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for collaboratively training machine learning models using distributed data with label deficiency.
We propose a novel twin-model paradigm, called Twin-sight, designed to enhance mutual guidance by providing insights from different perspectives of labeled and unlabeled data.
Our comprehensive experiments on four benchmark datasets provide substantial evidence that Twin-sight can significantly outperform state-of-the-art methods across various experimental settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-22T10:19:34Z) - Nearest Neighbour Score Estimators for Diffusion Generative Models [16.189734871742743]
We introduce a novel nearest neighbour score function estimator which utilizes multiple samples from the training set to dramatically decrease estimator variance.
In diffusion models, we show that our estimator can replace a learned network for probability-flow ODE integration, opening promising new avenues of future research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-12T19:27:30Z) - DF2: Distribution-Free Decision-Focused Learning [53.2476224456902]
Decision-focused learning (DFL) has recently emerged as a powerful approach for predictthen-optimize problems.
Existing end-to-end DFL methods are hindered by three significant bottlenecks: model error, sample average approximation error, and distribution-based parameterization of the expected objective.
We present DF2 -- the first textit-free decision-focused learning method explicitly designed to address these three bottlenecks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-11T00:44:46Z) - Visual Validation versus Visual Estimation: A Study on the Average Value
in Scatterplots [11.15435671066952]
We investigate the ability of individuals to visually validate statistical models in terms of their fit to the data.
It is unknown how well people are able to visually validate models, and how their performance compares to visual and computational estimation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-18T15:13:15Z) - Revisiting the Evaluation of Image Synthesis with GANs [55.72247435112475]
This study presents an empirical investigation into the evaluation of synthesis performance, with generative adversarial networks (GANs) as a representative of generative models.
In particular, we make in-depth analyses of various factors, including how to represent a data point in the representation space, how to calculate a fair distance using selected samples, and how many instances to use from each set.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-04T17:54:32Z) - DiffPose: Multi-hypothesis Human Pose Estimation using Diffusion models [5.908471365011943]
We propose emphDiffPose, a conditional diffusion model that predicts multiple hypotheses for a given input image.
We show that DiffPose slightly improves upon the state of the art for multi-hypothesis pose estimation for simple poses and outperforms it by a large margin for highly ambiguous poses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-29T18:55:13Z) - Composed Image Retrieval with Text Feedback via Multi-grained
Uncertainty Regularization [73.04187954213471]
We introduce a unified learning approach to simultaneously modeling the coarse- and fine-grained retrieval.
The proposed method has achieved +4.03%, +3.38%, and +2.40% Recall@50 accuracy over a strong baseline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-14T14:25:40Z) - Uncertainty-Aware Adaptation for Self-Supervised 3D Human Pose
Estimation [70.32536356351706]
We introduce MRP-Net that constitutes a common deep network backbone with two output heads subscribing to two diverse configurations.
We derive suitable measures to quantify prediction uncertainty at both pose and joint level.
We present a comprehensive evaluation of the proposed approach and demonstrate state-of-the-art performance on benchmark datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-29T07:14:58Z) - Flexible Amortized Variational Inference in qBOLD MRI [56.4324135502282]
Oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) and deoxygenated blood volume (DBV) are more ambiguously determined from the data.
Existing inference methods tend to yield very noisy and underestimated OEF maps, while overestimating DBV.
This work describes a novel probabilistic machine learning approach that can infer plausible distributions of OEF and DBV.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-11T10:47:16Z) - IMACS: Image Model Attribution Comparison Summaries [16.80986701058596]
We introduce IMACS, a method that combines gradient-based model attributions with aggregation and visualization techniques.
IMACS extracts salient input features from an evaluation dataset, clusters them based on similarity, then visualizes differences in model attributions for similar input features.
We show how our technique can uncover behavioral differences caused by domain shift between two models trained on satellite images.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-26T21:35:14Z) - Learning Gaussian Graphical Models with Latent Confounders [74.72998362041088]
We compare and contrast two strategies for inference in graphical models with latent confounders.
While these two approaches have similar goals, they are motivated by different assumptions about confounding.
We propose a new method, which combines the strengths of these two approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-14T00:53:03Z) - Score Matched Conditional Exponential Families for Likelihood-Free
Inference [0.0]
Likelihood-Free Inference (LFI) relies on simulations from the model.
We generate parameter-simulation pairs from the model independently on the observation.
We use Neural Networks whose weights are tuned with Score Matching to learn a conditional exponential family likelihood approximation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-20T11:57:30Z) - Weakly Supervised Generative Network for Multiple 3D Human Pose
Hypotheses [74.48263583706712]
3D human pose estimation from a single image is an inverse problem due to the inherent ambiguity of the missing depth.
We propose a weakly supervised deep generative network to address the inverse problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-13T09:26:01Z) - Multi-person 3D Pose Estimation in Crowded Scenes Based on Multi-View
Geometry [62.29762409558553]
Epipolar constraints are at the core of feature matching and depth estimation in multi-person 3D human pose estimation methods.
Despite the satisfactory performance of this formulation in sparser crowd scenes, its effectiveness is frequently challenged under denser crowd circumstances.
In this paper, we depart from the multi-person 3D pose estimation formulation, and instead reformulate it as crowd pose estimation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-21T17:59:36Z) - Estimating Treatment Effects with Observed Confounders and Mediators [25.338901482522648]
Given a causal graph, the do-calculus can express treatment effects as functionals of the observational joint distribution that can be estimated empirically.
Sometimes the do-calculus identifies multiple valid formulae, prompting us to compare the statistical properties of the corresponding estimators.
In this paper, we investigate the over-identified scenario where both confounders and mediators are observed, rendering both estimators valid.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-26T15:50:25Z) - Decision-Making with Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes [71.44735417472043]
We show that a posterior approximation distinct from the variational distribution should be used for making decisions.
Motivated by these theoretical results, we propose learning several approximate proposals for the best model.
In addition to toy examples, we present a full-fledged case study of single-cell RNA sequencing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-17T19:23:36Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.