Data Ethics Emergency Drill: A Toolbox for Discussing Responsible AI for Industry Teams

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.10438v1
• Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 16:20:51 GMT
• Title: Data Ethics Emergency Drill: A Toolbox for Discussing Responsible AI for Industry Teams
• Authors: Vanessa Aisyahsari Hanschke, Dylan Rees, Merve Alanyali, David Hopkinson, Paul Marshall,
• Abstract summary: We designed and tested a toolbox called the data ethics emergency drill (DEED) to help data science teams discuss and reflect on the ethical implications of their work. The DEED is a roleplay of a fictional ethical emergency scenario that is contextually situated in the team's specific workplace and applications. Our findings show that practitioners can apply lessons learnt from the roleplay to real-life situations.
• Score: 3.0376870146262793
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Researchers urge technology practitioners such as data scientists to consider the impacts and ethical implications of algorithmic decisions. However, unlike programming, statistics, and data management, discussion of ethical implications is rarely included in standard data science training. To begin to address this gap, we designed and tested a toolbox called the data ethics emergency drill (DEED) to help data science teams discuss and reflect on the ethical implications of their work. The DEED is a roleplay of a fictional ethical emergency scenario that is contextually situated in the team's specific workplace and applications. This paper outlines the DEED toolbox and describes three studies carried out with two different data science teams that iteratively shaped its design. Our findings show that practitioners can apply lessons learnt from the roleplay to real-life situations, and how the DEED opened up conversations around ethics and values.

Related papers

• DISCOVERYWORLD: A Virtual Environment for Developing and Evaluating Automated Scientific Discovery Agents [49.74065769505137]
  We introduce DISCOVERYWORLD, the first virtual environment for developing and benchmarking an agent's ability to perform complete cycles of novel scientific discovery. It includes 120 different challenge tasks spanning eight topics each with three levels of difficulty and several parametric variations. We find that strong baseline agents, that perform well in prior published environments, struggle on most DISCOVERYWORLD tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T20:08:44Z)
• Eagle: Ethical Dataset Given from Real Interactions [74.7319697510621]
  We create datasets extracted from real interactions between ChatGPT and users that exhibit social biases, toxicity, and immoral problems. Our experiments show that Eagle captures complementary aspects, not covered by existing datasets proposed for evaluation and mitigation of such ethical challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T03:46:02Z)
• On Responsible Machine Learning Datasets with Fairness, Privacy, and Regulatory Norms [56.119374302685934]
  There have been severe concerns over the trustworthiness of AI technologies. Machine and deep learning algorithms depend heavily on the data used during their development. We propose a framework to evaluate the datasets through a responsible rubric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T14:01:53Z)
• EALM: Introducing Multidimensional Ethical Alignment in Conversational Information Retrieval [43.72331337131317]
  We introduce a workflow that integrates ethical alignment with an initial ethical judgment stage for efficient data screening. We present the QA-ETHICS dataset adapted from the ETHICS benchmark, which serves as an evaluation tool by unifying scenarios and label meanings. In addition, we suggest a new approach that achieves top performance in both binary and multi-label ethical judgment tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T08:22:34Z)
• The ethical ambiguity of AI data enrichment: Measuring gaps in research ethics norms and practices [2.28438857884398]
  This study explores how, and to what extent, comparable research ethics requirements and norms have developed for AI research and data enrichment. Leading AI venues have begun to establish protocols for human data collection, but these are are inconsistently followed by authors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T16:12:55Z)
• TAPS Responsibility Matrix: A tool for responsible data science by design [2.2973034509761816]
  We describe the Transparency, Accountability, Privacy, and Societal Responsibility Matrix (TAPS-RM) as framework to explore social, legal, and ethical aspects of data science projects. We map the developed model of TAPS-RM with well-known initiatives for open data. We conclude that TAPS-RM is a tool to reflect on responsibilities at a data science project level and can be used to advance responsible data science by design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-02T12:09:14Z)
• How Data Scientists Review the Scholarly Literature [4.406926847270567]
  We examine the literature review practices of data scientists. Data science represents a field seeing an exponential rise in papers. No prior work has examined the specific practices and challenges faced by these scientists.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-10T03:53:05Z)
• Ethics Sheets for AI Tasks [25.289525325790414]
  I will make a case for thinking about ethical considerations not just at the level of individual models and datasets, but also at the level of AI tasks. I will present a new form of such an effort, Ethics Sheets for AI Tasks, dedicated to fleshing out the assumptions and ethical considerations hidden in how a task is commonly framed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-02T16:45:40Z)
• An Ethical Highlighter for People-Centric Dataset Creation [62.886916477131486]
  We propose an analytical framework to guide ethical evaluation of existing datasets and to serve future dataset creators in avoiding missteps. Our work is informed by a review and analysis of prior works and highlights where such ethical challenges arise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-27T07:18:44Z)
• Knowledge-Aware Procedural Text Understanding with Multi-Stage Training [110.93934567725826]
  We focus on the task of procedural text understanding, which aims to comprehend such documents and track entities' states and locations during a process. Two challenges, the difficulty of commonsense reasoning and data insufficiency, still remain unsolved. We propose a novel KnOwledge-Aware proceduraL text understAnding (KOALA) model, which effectively leverages multiple forms of external knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-28T10:28:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.