Uncertainty estimation in spatial interpolation of satellite precipitation with ensemble learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.10567v1
• Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 17:45:56 GMT
• Title: Uncertainty estimation in spatial interpolation of satellite precipitation with ensemble learning
• Authors: Georgia Papacharalampous, Hristos Tyralis, Nikolaos Doulamis, Anastasios Doulamis,
• Abstract summary: We introduce nine quantile-based ensemble learners and apply them to large precipitation datasets. Our ensemble learners include six stacking and three simple methods (mean, median, best combiner) Stacking with QR and QRNN yielded the best results across quantile levels of interest.
• Score: 3.8623569699070353
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Predictions in the form of probability distributions are crucial for decision-making. Quantile regression enables this within spatial interpolation settings for merging remote sensing and gauge precipitation data. However, ensemble learning of quantile regression algorithms remains unexplored in this context. Here, we address this gap by introducing nine quantile-based ensemble learners and applying them to large precipitation datasets. We employed a novel feature engineering strategy, reducing predictors to distance-weighted satellite precipitation at relevant locations, combined with location elevation. Our ensemble learners include six stacking and three simple methods (mean, median, best combiner), combining six individual algorithms: quantile regression (QR), quantile regression forests (QRF), generalized random forests (GRF), gradient boosting machines (GBM), light gradient boosting machines (LightGBM), and quantile regression neural networks (QRNN). These algorithms serve as both base learners and combiners within different stacking methods. We evaluated performance against QR using quantile scoring functions in a large dataset comprising 15 years of monthly gauge-measured and satellite precipitation in contiguous US (CONUS). Stacking with QR and QRNN yielded the best results across quantile levels of interest (0.025, 0.050, 0.075, 0.100, 0.200, 0.300, 0.400, 0.500, 0.600, 0.700, 0.800, 0.900, 0.925, 0.950, 0.975), surpassing the reference method by 3.91% to 8.95%. This demonstrates the potential of stacking to improve probabilistic predictions in spatial interpolation and beyond.

Related papers

• Semiparametric conformal prediction [79.6147286161434]
  Risk-sensitive applications require well-calibrated prediction sets over multiple, potentially correlated target variables. We treat the scores as random vectors and aim to construct the prediction set accounting for their joint correlation structure. We report desired coverage and competitive efficiency on a range of real-world regression problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T14:29:02Z)
• Uncertainty estimation in satellite precipitation spatial prediction by combining distributional regression algorithms [3.8623569699070353]
  We introduce the concept of distributional regression for the engineering task of creating precipitation datasets through data merging. We propose new ensemble learning methods that can be valuable not only for spatial prediction but also for prediction problems in general.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-29T05:58:00Z)
• Relaxed Quantile Regression: Prediction Intervals for Asymmetric Noise [51.87307904567702]
  Quantile regression is a leading approach for obtaining such intervals via the empirical estimation of quantiles in the distribution of outputs. We propose Relaxed Quantile Regression (RQR), a direct alternative to quantile regression based interval construction that removes this arbitrary constraint. We demonstrate that this added flexibility results in intervals with an improvement in desirable qualities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T13:36:38Z)
• Minimally Supervised Learning using Topological Projections in Self-Organizing Maps [55.31182147885694]
  We introduce a semi-supervised learning approach based on topological projections in self-organizing maps (SOMs) Our proposed method first trains SOMs on unlabeled data and then a minimal number of available labeled data points are assigned to key best matching units (BMU) Our results indicate that the proposed minimally supervised model significantly outperforms traditional regression techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T22:51:48Z)
• Uncertainty estimation of machine learning spatial precipitation predictions from satellite data [3.8623569699070353]
  Merging satellite and gauge data with machine learning produces high-resolution precipitation datasets. We address the gap of how to optimally provide such estimates by benchmarking six algorithms. We propose a suite of machine learning algorithms for estimating uncertainty in spatial data prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T17:55:28Z)
• Neural Bayes Estimators for Irregular Spatial Data using Graph Neural Networks [0.0]
  We employ graph neural networks to tackle the problem of parameter point estimation from data collected over arbitrary spatial locations. In addition to extending neural Bayes estimation to irregular spatial data, our architecture leads to substantial computational benefits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-04T06:13:22Z)
• Ensemble learning for blending gridded satellite and gauge-measured precipitation data [4.2193475197905705]
  This study proposes 11 new ensemble learners for improving the accuracy of satellite precipitation products. We apply the ensemble learners to monthly data from the PERSIANN and IMERG gridded datasets. We also use gauge-measured precipitation data from the Global Historical Climatology Network monthly database.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-09T17:54:46Z)
• Rethinking Spatial Invariance of Convolutional Networks for Object Counting [119.83017534355842]
  We try to use locally connected Gaussian kernels to replace the original convolution filter to estimate the spatial position in the density map. Inspired by previous work, we propose a low-rank approximation accompanied with translation invariance to favorably implement the approximation of massive Gaussian convolution. Our methods significantly outperform other state-of-the-art methods and achieve promising learning of the spatial position of objects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-10T17:51:25Z)
• Communication-Efficient Distributed Quantile Regression with Optimal Statistical Guarantees [2.064612766965483]
  We address the problem of how to achieve optimal inference in distributed quantile regression without stringent scaling conditions. The difficulties are resolved through a double-smoothing approach that is applied to the local (at each data source) and global objective functions. Despite the reliance on a delicate combination of local and global smoothing parameters, the quantile regression model is fully parametric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-25T17:09:59Z)
• Flexible Model Aggregation for Quantile Regression [92.63075261170302]
  Quantile regression is a fundamental problem in statistical learning motivated by a need to quantify uncertainty in predictions. We investigate methods for aggregating any number of conditional quantile models. All of the models we consider in this paper can be fit using modern deep learning toolkits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-26T23:21:16Z)
• Solving Mixed Integer Programs Using Neural Networks [57.683491412480635]
  This paper applies learning to the two key sub-tasks of a MIP solver, generating a high-quality joint variable assignment, and bounding the gap in objective value between that assignment and an optimal one. Our approach constructs two corresponding neural network-based components, Neural Diving and Neural Branching, to use in a base MIP solver such as SCIP. We evaluate our approach on six diverse real-world datasets, including two Google production datasets and MIPLIB, by training separate neural networks on each.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-23T09:33:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.