Deconstructing In-Context Learning: Understanding Prompts via Corruption

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.02054v2
• Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 16:12:37 GMT
• Title: Deconstructing In-Context Learning: Understanding Prompts via Corruption
• Authors: Namrata Shivagunde, Vladislav Lialin, Sherin Muckatira, Anna Rumshisky,
• Abstract summary: We decompose the entire prompt into four components: task description, demonstration inputs, labels, and inline instructions. We study models ranging from 1.5B to 70B in size, using ten datasets covering classification and generation tasks. We find that repeating text within the prompt boosts model performance, and bigger models are more sensitive to the semantics of the prompt.
• Score: 13.37109575313212
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The ability of large language models (LLMs) to $``$learn in context$"$ based on the provided prompt has led to an explosive growth in their use, culminating in the proliferation of AI assistants such as ChatGPT, Claude, and Bard. These AI assistants are known to be robust to minor prompt modifications, mostly due to alignment techniques that use human feedback. In contrast, the underlying pre-trained LLMs they use as a backbone are known to be brittle in this respect. Building high-quality backbone models remains a core challenge, and a common approach to assessing their quality is to conduct few-shot evaluation. Such evaluation is notorious for being highly sensitive to minor prompt modifications, as well as the choice of specific in-context examples. Prior work has examined how modifying different elements of the prompt can affect model performance. However, these earlier studies tended to concentrate on a limited number of specific prompt attributes and often produced contradictory results. Additionally, previous research either focused on models with fewer than 15 billion parameters or exclusively examined black-box models like GPT-3 or PaLM, making replication challenging. In the present study, we decompose the entire prompt into four components: task description, demonstration inputs, labels, and inline instructions provided for each demonstration. We investigate the effects of structural and semantic corruptions of these elements on model performance. We study models ranging from 1.5B to 70B in size, using ten datasets covering classification and generation tasks. We find that repeating text within the prompt boosts model performance, and bigger models ($\geq$30B) are more sensitive to the semantics of the prompt. Finally, we observe that adding task and inline instructions to the demonstrations enhances model performance even when the instructions are semantically corrupted.

Related papers

• On the Worst Prompt Performance of Large Language Models [93.13542053835542]
  Performance of large language models (LLMs) is acutely sensitive to the phrasing of prompts. We introduce RobustAlpacaEval, a new benchmark that consists of semantically equivalent case-level queries. Experiments on RobustAlpacaEval with ChatGPT and six open-source LLMs from the Llama, Mistral, and Gemma families uncover substantial variability in model performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-08T13:40:38Z)
• Constructive Large Language Models Alignment with Diverse Feedback [76.9578950893839]
  We introduce Constructive and Diverse Feedback (CDF) as a novel method to enhance large language models alignment. We exploit critique feedback for easy problems, refinement feedback for medium problems, and preference feedback for hard problems. By training our model with this diversified feedback, we achieve enhanced alignment performance while using less training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T09:20:14Z)
• Using Foundation Models to Detect Policy Violations with Minimal Supervision [15.599296461516982]
  We seek to leverage foundation models' capabilities to detect policy violations. We compose the hard-prompts with soft prompt tuning to produce a classifier that attains high accuracy with very little supervision. We identify several unintuitive aspects of foundation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-09T20:08:48Z)
• Fairness-guided Few-shot Prompting for Large Language Models [93.05624064699965]
  In-context learning can suffer from high instability due to variations in training examples, example order, and prompt formats. We introduce a metric to evaluate the predictive bias of a fixed prompt against labels or a given attributes. We propose a novel search strategy based on the greedy search to identify the near-optimal prompt for improving the performance of in-context learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-23T12:28:25Z)
• Structured Prompting: Scaling In-Context Learning to 1,000 Examples [78.41281805608081]
  We introduce structured prompting that breaks the length limit and scales in-context learning to thousands of examples. Specifically, demonstration examples are separately encoded with well-designed position embeddings, and then they are jointly attended by the test example using a rescaled attention mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-13T16:31:21Z)
• Contrastive Learning for Prompt-Based Few-Shot Language Learners [14.244787327283335]
  We present a contrastive learning framework that clusters inputs from the same class under different augmented "views" We create different "views" of an example by appending it with different language prompts and contextual demonstrations. Our method can improve over the state-of-the-art methods in a diverse set of 15 language tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-03T04:56:45Z)
• AES Systems Are Both Overstable And Oversensitive: Explaining Why And Proposing Defenses [66.49753193098356]
  We investigate the reason behind the surprising adversarial brittleness of scoring models. Our results indicate that autoscoring models, despite getting trained as "end-to-end" models, behave like bag-of-words models. We propose detection-based protection models that can detect oversensitivity and overstability causing samples with high accuracies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-24T03:49:38Z)
• Reframing Instructional Prompts to GPTk's Language [72.69833640335519]
  We propose reframing techniques for model designers to create effective prompts for language models. Our results show that reframing improves few-shot learning performance by 14% while reducing sample complexity. The performance gains are particularly important on large language models, such as GPT3 where tuning models or prompts on large datasets is not feasible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-16T09:44:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.