Large Language Models are as persuasive as humans, but how? About the cognitive effort and moral-emotional language of LLM arguments
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.09329v2
- Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2024 07:07:08 GMT
- Title: Large Language Models are as persuasive as humans, but how? About the cognitive effort and moral-emotional language of LLM arguments
- Authors: Carlos Carrasco-Farre,
- Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) are already as persuasive as humans.
This paper investigates the persuasion strategies of LLMs, comparing them with human-generated arguments.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are already as persuasive as humans. However, we know very little about how they do it. This paper investigates the persuasion strategies of LLMs, comparing them with human-generated arguments. Using a dataset of 1,251 participants in an experiment, we analyze the persuasion strategies of LLM-generated and human-generated arguments using measures of cognitive effort (lexical and grammatical complexity) and moral-emotional language (sentiment and moral analysis). The study reveals that LLMs produce arguments that require higher cognitive effort, exhibiting more complex grammatical and lexical structures than human counterparts. Additionally, LLMs demonstrate a significant propensity to engage more deeply with moral language, utilizing both positive and negative moral foundations more frequently than humans. In contrast with previous research, no significant difference was found in the emotional content produced by LLMs and humans. These findings contribute to the discourse on AI and persuasion, highlighting the dual potential of LLMs to both enhance and undermine informational integrity through communication strategies for digital persuasion.
Related papers
- Large Language Models Reflect the Ideology of their Creators [73.25935570218375]
Large language models (LLMs) are trained on vast amounts of data to generate natural language.
We uncover notable diversity in the ideological stance exhibited across different LLMs and languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-24T04:02:30Z) - Language Model Alignment in Multilingual Trolley Problems [138.5684081822807]
Building on the Moral Machine experiment, we develop a cross-lingual corpus of moral dilemma vignettes in over 100 languages called MultiTP.
Our analysis explores the alignment of 19 different LLMs with human judgments, capturing preferences across six moral dimensions.
We discover significant variance in alignment across languages, challenging the assumption of uniform moral reasoning in AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-02T14:02:53Z) - Measuring and Benchmarking Large Language Models' Capabilities to Generate Persuasive Language [41.052284715017606]
We study the ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to produce persuasive text.
As opposed to prior work which focuses on particular domains or types of persuasion, we conduct a general study across various domains.
We construct the new dataset Persuasive-Pairs of pairs of pairs of a short text and its rewrite by an LLM to amplify or diminish persuasive language.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-25T17:40:47Z) - Can Language Models Recognize Convincing Arguments? [12.458437450959416]
Large language models (LLMs) have raised concerns about their potential to create and propagate convincing narratives.
We study their performance in detecting convincing arguments to gain insights into their persuasive capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-31T17:38:33Z) - How do Large Language Models Navigate Conflicts between Honesty and
Helpfulness? [14.706111954807021]
We use psychological models and experiments designed to characterize human behavior to analyze large language models.
We find that reinforcement learning from human feedback improves both honesty and helpfulness.
GPT-4 Turbo demonstrates human-like response patterns including sensitivity to the conversational framing and listener's decision context.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-11T19:13:26Z) - Boosting Large Language Model for Speech Synthesis: An Empirical Study [86.89548753080432]
Large language models (LLMs) have made significant advancements in natural language processing and are concurrently extending the language ability to other modalities, such as speech and vision.
We conduct a comprehensive empirical exploration of boosting LLMs with the ability to generate speech, by combining pre-trained LLM LLaMA/OPT and text-to-speech synthesis model VALL-E.
We compare three integration methods between LLMs and speech models, including directly fine-tuned LLMs, superposed layers of LLMs and VALL-E, and coupled LLMs and VALL-E using LLMs as a powerful text encoder
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-30T14:20:04Z) - How should the advent of large language models affect the practice of
science? [51.62881233954798]
How should the advent of large language models affect the practice of science?
We have invited four diverse groups of scientists to reflect on this query, sharing their perspectives and engaging in debate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-05T10:45:12Z) - Large Language Models: The Need for Nuance in Current Debates and a
Pragmatic Perspective on Understanding [1.3654846342364308]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are unparalleled in their ability to generate grammatically correct, fluent text.
This position paper critically assesses three points recurring in critiques of LLM capacities.
We outline a pragmatic perspective on the issue of real' understanding and intentionality in LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-30T15:51:04Z) - PromptRobust: Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models on Adversarial Prompts [76.18347405302728]
This study uses a plethora of adversarial textual attacks targeting prompts across multiple levels: character, word, sentence, and semantic.
The adversarial prompts are then employed in diverse tasks including sentiment analysis, natural language inference, reading comprehension, machine translation, and math problem-solving.
Our findings demonstrate that contemporary Large Language Models are not robust to adversarial prompts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-07T15:37:00Z) - Large Language Models are In-Context Semantic Reasoners rather than
Symbolic Reasoners [75.85554779782048]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have excited the natural language and machine learning community over recent years.
Despite of numerous successful applications, the underlying mechanism of such in-context capabilities still remains unclear.
In this work, we hypothesize that the learned textitsemantics of language tokens do the most heavy lifting during the reasoning process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-24T07:33:34Z) - Are LLMs the Master of All Trades? : Exploring Domain-Agnostic Reasoning
Skills of LLMs [0.0]
This study aims to investigate the performance of large language models (LLMs) on different reasoning tasks.
My findings indicate that LLMs excel at analogical and moral reasoning, yet struggle to perform as proficiently on spatial reasoning tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-22T22:53:44Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.