Is DPO Superior to PPO for LLM Alignment? A Comprehensive Study
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.10719v2
- Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2024 11:58:54 GMT
- Title: Is DPO Superior to PPO for LLM Alignment? A Comprehensive Study
- Authors: Shusheng Xu, Wei Fu, Jiaxuan Gao, Wenjie Ye, Weilin Liu, Zhiyu Mei, Guangju Wang, Chao Yu, Yi Wu,
- Abstract summary: Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is currently the most widely used method to align large language models (LLMs) with human preferences.
In academic benchmarks, state-of-the-art results are often achieved via reward-free methods, such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO)
We show that PPO is able to surpass other alignment methods in all cases and achieve state-of-the-art results in challenging code competitions.
- Score: 16.99550556866219
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is currently the most widely used method to align large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. Existing RLHF methods can be roughly categorized as either reward-based or reward-free. Novel applications such as ChatGPT and Claude leverage reward-based methods that first learn a reward model and apply actor-critic algorithms, such as Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO). However, in academic benchmarks, state-of-the-art results are often achieved via reward-free methods, such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO). Is DPO truly superior to PPO? Why does PPO perform poorly on these benchmarks? In this paper, we first conduct both theoretical and empirical studies on the algorithmic properties of DPO and show that DPO may have fundamental limitations. Moreover, we also comprehensively examine PPO and reveal the key factors for the best performances of PPO in fine-tuning LLMs. Finally, we benchmark DPO and PPO across a collection of RLHF testbeds, ranging from dialogue to code generation. Experiment results demonstrate that PPO is able to surpass other alignment methods in all cases and achieve state-of-the-art results in challenging code competitions.
Related papers
- Understanding Reference Policies in Direct Preference Optimization [50.67309013764383]
Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has become a widely used training method for the instruction fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs)
This work explores an under-investigated aspect of DPO - its dependency on the reference model or policy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-18T17:08:10Z) - D2PO: Discriminator-Guided DPO with Response Evaluation Models [63.71853401569461]
We propose D2PO, discriminator-guided DPO, for the online setting where preferences are being collected throughout learning.
As we collect gold preferences, we use these not only to train our policy, but to train a discriminative response evaluation model to silver-label even more synthetic data for policy training.
We show conditions under which silver labeling is most helpful: it is most effective when training the policy with DPO, outperforming traditional PPO, and benefits from maintaining a separate discriminator from the policy model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-02T17:44:41Z) - DPO Meets PPO: Reinforced Token Optimization for RLHF [36.97894955691627]
We introduce a framework that models RLHF problems as a Markov decision process (MDP)
Under this framework, we introduce an algorithm, dubbed as Reinforced Token Optimization (textttRTO), which learns the token-wise reward function from preference data.
For its practical implementation, textttRTO innovatively integrates Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and Proximal Policy Optimization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-29T17:58:30Z) - From $r$ to $Q^*$: Your Language Model is Secretly a Q-Function [50.812404038684505]
Reinforcement Learning From Human Feedback (RLHF) has been a critical to the success of the latest generation of generative AI models.
Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has emerged as an alternative approach.
DPO solves the same objective as the standard RLHF setup, but there is a mismatch between the two approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-18T17:37:02Z) - RS-DPO: A Hybrid Rejection Sampling and Direct Preference Optimization Method for Alignment of Large Language Models [7.676477609461592]
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has been extensively employed to align large language models with user intent.
DPO relies on contrastive responses generated from human annotator and alternative LLM, instead of the policy model.
In this paper, we address both challenges by systematically combining sampling rejection (RS) and DPO.
Our proposed method effectively fine-tunes LLMs with limited resource environments, leading to improved alignment with user intent.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-15T16:00:58Z) - Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part I: PPO [81.01936993929127]
Large language models (LLMs) have formulated a blueprint for the advancement of artificial general intelligence.
reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) emerges as the pivotal technological paradigm underpinning this pursuit.
In this report, we dissect the framework of RLHF, re-evaluate the inner workings of PPO, and explore how the parts comprising PPO algorithms impact policy agent training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-11T01:55:24Z) - Fine-Tuning Language Models with Advantage-Induced Policy Alignment [80.96507425217472]
We propose a novel algorithm for aligning large language models to human preferences.
We show that it consistently outperforms PPO in language tasks by a large margin.
We also provide a theoretical justification supporting the design of our loss function.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-04T01:59:40Z) - You May Not Need Ratio Clipping in PPO [117.03368180633463]
Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) methods learn a policy by iteratively performing multiple mini-batch optimization epochs of a surrogate objective with one set of sampled data.
Ratio clipping PPO is a popular variant that clips the probability ratios between the target policy and the policy used to collect samples.
We show in this paper that such ratio clipping may not be a good option as it can fail to effectively bound the ratios.
We show that ESPO can be easily scaled up to distributed training with many workers, delivering strong performance as well.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-31T20:26:56Z) - CIM-PPO:Proximal Policy Optimization with Liu-Correntropy Induced Metric [0.0]
As an algorithm based on deep reinforcement learning, Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) performs well in many complex tasks.
Clip-PPO is widely used in a variety of practical scenarios and has attracted the attention of many researchers.
As a more theoretical algorithm, KL-PPO was neglected because its performance was not as good as CliP-PPO.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-20T12:20:52Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.