Improving probabilistic error cancellation in the presence of non-stationary noise
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.13269v2
- Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 16:37:45 GMT
- Title: Improving probabilistic error cancellation in the presence of non-stationary noise
- Authors: Samudra Dasgupta, Travis S. Humble,
- Abstract summary: We design a strategy to enhance PEC stability and accuracy in the presence of non-stationary noise.
Experiments using a 5-qubit implementation of the Bernstein-Vazirani algorithm and conducted on the ibm_kolkata device reveal a 42% improvement in accuracy and a 60% enhancement in stability.
- Score: 0.1227734309612871
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: We investigate the stability of probabilistic error cancellation (PEC) outcomes in the presence of non-stationary noise, which is an obstacle to achieving accurate observable estimates. Leveraging Bayesian methods, we design a strategy to enhance PEC stability and accuracy. Our experiments using a 5-qubit implementation of the Bernstein-Vazirani algorithm and conducted on the ibm_kolkata device reveal a 42% improvement in accuracy and a 60% enhancement in stability compared to non-adaptive PEC. These results underscore the importance of adaptive estimation processes to effectively address non-stationary noise, vital for advancing PEC utility.
Related papers
- Beyond Confidence: Adaptive Abstention in Dual-Threshold Conformal Prediction for Autonomous System Perception [0.4124847249415279]
Safety-critical perception systems require reliable uncertainty quantification and principled abstention mechanisms to maintain safety.
We present a novel dual-threshold conformalization framework that provides statistically-guaranteed uncertainty estimates while enabling selective prediction in high-risk scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-11T04:45:31Z) - Uncertainty Quantification in Stereo Matching [61.73532883992135]
We propose a new framework for stereo matching and its uncertainty quantification.
We adopt Bayes risk as a measure of uncertainty and estimate data and model uncertainty separately.
We apply our uncertainty method to improve prediction accuracy by selecting data points with small uncertainties.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-24T23:28:20Z) - Using dynamic loss weighting to boost improvements in forecast stability [0.9332308328407303]
Rolling origin forecast instability refers to variability in forecasts for a specific period induced by updating the forecast.
It was shown that more stable forecasts can be obtained without harming accuracy by minimizing a composite loss function.
We show that existing dynamic loss weighting methods can achieve this objective and provide insights into why this might be the case.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-26T20:21:46Z) - Adaptive mitigation of time-varying quantum noise [0.1227734309612871]
Current quantum computers suffer from non-stationary noise channels with high error rates.
We propose a Bayesian inference-based adaptive algorithm that can learn and mitigate quantum noise in response to changing channel conditions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-16T01:33:07Z) - Impact of unreliable devices on stability of quantum computations [0.1227734309612871]
Noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices are valuable platforms for testing the tenets of quantum computing.
These devices are susceptible to errors arising from de-coherence, leakage, cross-talk and other sources of noise.
Here, we quantify the reliability of NISQ devices by assessing the necessary conditions for generating stable results within a given tolerance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-13T17:53:42Z) - Towards Reliable Medical Image Segmentation by utilizing Evidential Calibrated Uncertainty [52.03490691733464]
We introduce DEviS, an easily implementable foundational model that seamlessly integrates into various medical image segmentation networks.
By leveraging subjective logic theory, we explicitly model probability and uncertainty for the problem of medical image segmentation.
DeviS incorporates an uncertainty-aware filtering module, which utilizes the metric of uncertainty-calibrated error to filter reliable data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-01T05:02:46Z) - Sample Efficient Deep Reinforcement Learning via Uncertainty Estimation [12.415463205960156]
In model-free deep reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms, using noisy value estimates to supervise policy evaluation and optimization is detrimental to the sample efficiency.
We provide a systematic analysis of the sources of uncertainty in the noisy supervision that occurs in RL.
We propose a method whereby two complementary uncertainty estimation methods account for both the Q-value and the environmentity to better mitigate the negative impacts of noisy supervision.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-05T15:46:06Z) - Analyzing and Improving the Optimization Landscape of Noise-Contrastive
Estimation [50.85788484752612]
Noise-contrastive estimation (NCE) is a statistically consistent method for learning unnormalized probabilistic models.
It has been empirically observed that the choice of the noise distribution is crucial for NCE's performance.
In this work, we formally pinpoint reasons for NCE's poor performance when an inappropriate noise distribution is used.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-21T16:57:45Z) - Probabilistic robust linear quadratic regulators with Gaussian processes [73.0364959221845]
Probabilistic models such as Gaussian processes (GPs) are powerful tools to learn unknown dynamical systems from data for subsequent use in control design.
We present a novel controller synthesis for linearized GP dynamics that yields robust controllers with respect to a probabilistic stability margin.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-17T08:36:18Z) - The Aleatoric Uncertainty Estimation Using a Separate Formulation with
Virtual Residuals [51.71066839337174]
Existing methods can quantify the error in the target estimation, but they tend to underestimate it.
We propose a new separable formulation for the estimation of a signal and of its uncertainty, avoiding the effect of overfitting.
We demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms a state-of-the-art technique for signal and uncertainty estimation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-03T12:11:27Z) - Evaluating probabilistic classifiers: Reliability diagrams and score
decompositions revisited [68.8204255655161]
We introduce the CORP approach, which generates provably statistically Consistent, Optimally binned, and Reproducible reliability diagrams in an automated way.
Corpor is based on non-parametric isotonic regression and implemented via the Pool-adjacent-violators (PAV) algorithm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-07T08:22:26Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.