A Framework for Real-time Safeguarding the Text Generation of Large Language Model
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.19048v2
- Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 19:53:12 GMT
- Title: A Framework for Real-time Safeguarding the Text Generation of Large Language Model
- Authors: Ximing Dong, Dayi Lin, Shaowei Wang, Ahmed E. Hassan,
- Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly advanced natural language processing (NLP) tasks.
They pose ethical and societal risks due to their propensity to generate harmful content.
We propose LLMSafeGuard, a lightweight framework to safeguard LLM text generation in real-time.
- Score: 12.683042228674694
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly advanced natural language processing (NLP) tasks but also pose ethical and societal risks due to their propensity to generate harmful content. To address this, various approaches have been developed to safeguard LLMs from producing unsafe content. However, existing methods have limitations, including the need for training specific control models and proactive intervention during text generation, that lead to quality degradation and increased computational overhead. To mitigate those limitations, we propose LLMSafeGuard, a lightweight framework to safeguard LLM text generation in real-time. LLMSafeGuard integrates an external validator into the beam search algorithm during decoding, rejecting candidates that violate safety constraints while allowing valid ones to proceed. We introduce a similarity based validation approach, simplifying constraint introduction and eliminating the need for control model training. Additionally, LLMSafeGuard employs a context-wise timing selection strategy, intervening LLMs only when necessary. We evaluate LLMSafeGuard on two tasks, detoxification and copyright safeguarding, and demonstrate its superior performance over SOTA baselines. For instance, LLMSafeGuard reduces the average toxic score of. LLM output by 29.7% compared to the best baseline meanwhile preserving similar linguistic quality as natural output in detoxification task. Similarly, in the copyright task, LLMSafeGuard decreases the Longest Common Subsequence (LCS) by 56.2% compared to baselines. Moreover, our context-wise timing selection strategy reduces inference time by at least 24% meanwhile maintaining comparable effectiveness as validating each time step. LLMSafeGuard also offers tunable parameters to balance its effectiveness and efficiency.
Related papers
- ESLM: Risk-Averse Selective Language Modeling for Efficient Pretraining [53.893792844055106]
Large language model pretraining is compute-intensive, yet many tokens contribute marginally to learning, resulting in inefficiency.<n>We introduce Selective Efficient Language Modeling, a risk-aware algorithm that improves training efficiency and distributional robustness by performing online token-level batch selection.<n> Experiments on GPT-2 pretraining show that ESLM significantly reduces training FLOPs while maintaining or improving both perplexity and downstream performance compared to baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-26T12:23:26Z) - Reshaping Representation Space to Balance the Safety and Over-rejection in Large Audio Language Models [50.89022445197919]
Large Audio Language Models (LALMs) have extended the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Recent research has revealed that LALMs remain vulnerable to harmful queries due to insufficient safety-alignment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-26T08:25:25Z) - Helping Large Language Models Protect Themselves: An Enhanced Filtering and Summarization System [2.0257616108612373]
Large Language Models are vulnerable to adversarial assaults, manipulative prompts, and encoded malicious inputs.<n>This study presents a unique defense paradigm that allows LLMs to recognize, filter, and defend against adversarial or malicious inputs on their own.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-02T14:42:26Z) - Refining Positive and Toxic Samples for Dual Safety Self-Alignment of LLMs with Minimal Human Interventions [17.485655062129965]
Recent AI agents rely on instruction tuning and reinforcement learning to calibrate the output of large language models (LLMs) with human intentions.
We propose PT-ALIGN, a novel safety self-alignment approach that minimizes human supervision by automatically refining positive and toxic samples.
Experiments on 9 popular open-source LLMs demonstrate the effectiveness of our PT-ALIGN for safety alignment, while maintaining comparable levels of helpfulness and usefulness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-08T09:54:47Z) - Attribute Controlled Fine-tuning for Large Language Models: A Case Study on Detoxification [76.14641982122696]
We propose a constraint learning schema for fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) with attribute control.
We show that our approach leads to an LLM that produces fewer inappropriate responses while achieving competitive performance on benchmarks and a toxicity detection task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-07T23:38:58Z) - Control Large Language Models via Divide and Conquer [94.48784966256463]
This paper investigates controllable generation for large language models (LLMs) with prompt-based control, focusing on Lexically Constrained Generation (LCG)
We evaluate the performance of LLMs on satisfying lexical constraints with prompt-based control, as well as their efficacy in downstream applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-06T21:20:06Z) - Large Language Models can be Strong Self-Detoxifiers [82.6594169242814]
Self-disciplined Autoregressive Sampling (SASA) is a lightweight controlled decoding algorithm for toxicity reduction of large language models (LLMs)
SASA tracks the margin of the current output to steer the generation away from the toxic subspace, by adjusting the autoregressive sampling strategy.
evaluated on LLMs of different scale and nature, namely Llama-3.1-Instruct (8B), Llama-2 (7B), and GPT2-L models with the RealToxicityPrompts, BOLD, and AttaQ benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-04T17:45:15Z) - CoCA: Regaining Safety-awareness of Multimodal Large Language Models with Constitutional Calibration [90.36429361299807]
multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable success in engaging in conversations involving visual inputs.
The integration of visual modality has introduced a unique vulnerability: the MLLM becomes susceptible to malicious visual inputs.
We introduce a technique termed CoCA, which amplifies the safety-awareness of the MLLM by calibrating its output distribution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-17T17:14:41Z) - SLM as Guardian: Pioneering AI Safety with Small Language Models [6.799423428734095]
Internalizing safeguard features into larger models brought challenges of higher training cost and unintended degradation of helpfulness.
In this paper, we leverage a smaller LLM for both harmful query detection and safeguard response generation.
We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, providing on par or surpassing harmful query detection and safeguard response performance compared to the publicly available LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-30T08:03:15Z) - Robustifying Safety-Aligned Large Language Models through Clean Data Curation [11.273749179260468]
Large language models (LLMs) are vulnerable when trained on datasets containing harmful content.
In this paper, we propose a data curation framework designed to counter adversarial impacts in both scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-24T04:50:38Z) - S-Eval: Towards Automated and Comprehensive Safety Evaluation for Large Language Models [46.148439517272024]
Generative large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing with their transformative and emergent capabilities.
Recent evidence indicates that LLMs can produce harmful content that violates social norms.
We propose S-Eval, an automated Safety Evaluation framework with a newly defined comprehensive risk taxonomy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-23T05:34:31Z) - Protecting Your LLMs with Information Bottleneck [20.870610473199125]
We introduce the Information Bottleneck Protector (IBProtector), a defense mechanism grounded in the information bottleneck principle.
The IBProtector selectively compresses and perturbs prompts, facilitated by a lightweight and trainable extractor.
Our empirical evaluations show that IBProtector outperforms current defense methods in mitigating jailbreak attempts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-22T08:16:07Z) - RigorLLM: Resilient Guardrails for Large Language Models against Undesired Content [62.685566387625975]
Current mitigation strategies, while effective, are not resilient under adversarial attacks.
This paper introduces Resilient Guardrails for Large Language Models (RigorLLM), a novel framework designed to efficiently moderate harmful and unsafe inputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-19T07:25:02Z) - Eyes Closed, Safety On: Protecting Multimodal LLMs via Image-to-Text Transformation [98.02846901473697]
We propose ECSO (Eyes Closed, Safety On), a training-free protecting approach that exploits the inherent safety awareness of MLLMs.
ECSO generates safer responses via adaptively transforming unsafe images into texts to activate the intrinsic safety mechanism of pre-aligned LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-14T17:03:04Z) - Learning to Poison Large Language Models During Instruction Tuning [12.521338629194503]
This work identifies additional security risks in Large Language Models (LLMs) by designing a new data poisoning attack tailored to exploit the instruction tuning process.
We propose a novel gradient-guided backdoor trigger learning (GBTL) algorithm to identify adversarial triggers efficiently.
We propose two defense strategies against data poisoning attacks, including in-context learning (ICL) and continuous learning (CL)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-21T01:30:03Z) - ROSE Doesn't Do That: Boosting the Safety of Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models with Reverse Prompt Contrastive Decoding [89.0074567748505]
We present reverse prompt contrastive decoding (ROSE), a simple-yet-effective method to boost the safety of existing instruction-tuned LLMs without any additional training.
Experiments on 6 safety and 2 general-purpose tasks show that, our ROSE not only brings consistent and significant safety improvements (up to +13.8% safety score) upon 5 types of instruction-tuned LLMs, but also benefits the general-purpose ability of LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-19T06:58:42Z) - Do-Not-Answer: A Dataset for Evaluating Safeguards in LLMs [59.596335292426105]
This paper collects the first open-source dataset to evaluate safeguards in large language models.
We train several BERT-like classifiers to achieve results comparable with GPT-4 on automatic safety evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-25T14:02:12Z) - Red Teaming Language Model Detectors with Language Models [114.36392560711022]
Large language models (LLMs) present significant safety and ethical risks if exploited by malicious users.
Recent works have proposed algorithms to detect LLM-generated text and protect LLMs.
We study two types of attack strategies: 1) replacing certain words in an LLM's output with their synonyms given the context; 2) automatically searching for an instructional prompt to alter the writing style of the generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-31T10:08:37Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.