CoS: Enhancing Personalization and Mitigating Bias with Context Steering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.01768v1
• Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 22:37:38 GMT
• Title: CoS: Enhancing Personalization and Mitigating Bias with Context Steering
• Authors: Jerry Zhi-Yang He, Sashrika Pandey, Mariah L. Schrum, Anca Dragan,
• Abstract summary: Context can significantly shape the response of a large language model (LLM) We propose Context Steering (CoS) - a training-free method that can be easily applied to autoregressive LLMs at inference time. We showcase a variety of applications of CoS including amplifying the contextual influence to achieve better personalization and mitigating unwanted influence for reducing model bias.
• Score: 5.064910647314323
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: When querying a large language model (LLM), the context, i.e. personal, demographic, and cultural information specific to an end-user, can significantly shape the response of the LLM. For example, asking the model to explain Newton's second law with the context "I am a toddler" yields a different answer compared to the context "I am a physics professor." Proper usage of the context enables the LLM to generate personalized responses, whereas inappropriate contextual influence can lead to stereotypical and potentially harmful generations (e.g. associating "female" with "housekeeper"). In practice, striking the right balance when leveraging context is a nuanced and challenging problem that is often situation-dependent. One common approach to address this challenge is to fine-tune LLMs on contextually appropriate responses. However, this approach is expensive, time-consuming, and not controllable for end-users in different situations. In this work, we propose Context Steering (CoS) - a simple training-free method that can be easily applied to autoregressive LLMs at inference time. By measuring the contextual influence in terms of token prediction likelihood and modulating it, our method enables practitioners to determine the appropriate level of contextual influence based on their specific use case and end-user base. We showcase a variety of applications of CoS including amplifying the contextual influence to achieve better personalization and mitigating unwanted influence for reducing model bias. In addition, we show that we can combine CoS with Bayesian Inference to quantify the extent of hate speech on the internet. We demonstrate the effectiveness of CoS on state-of-the-art LLMs and benchmarks.

Related papers

• Tuning-Free Personalized Alignment via Trial-Error-Explain In-Context Learning [74.56097953187994]
  We present Trial-Error-Explain In-Context Learning (TICL), a tuning-free method that personalizes language models for text generation tasks. TICL iteratively expands an in-context learning prompt via a trial-error-explain process, adding model-generated negative samples and explanations. TICL achieves up to 91.5% against the previous state-of-the-art and outperforms competitive tuning-free baselines for personalized alignment tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-13T05:20:21Z)
• On the Loss of Context-awareness in General Instruction Fine-tuning [101.03941308894191]
  We investigate the loss of context awareness after supervised fine-tuning. We find that the performance decline is associated with a bias toward different roles learned during conversational instruction fine-tuning. We propose a metric to identify context-dependent examples from general instruction fine-tuning datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T00:16:01Z)
• QUITO-X: A New Perspective on Context Compression from the Information Bottleneck Theory [66.01597794579568]
  We introduce information bottleneck theory (IB) to model the problem. We propose a cross-attention-based approach to approximate mutual information in IB. Our method achieves a 25% increase in compression rate compared to the state-of-the-art.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-20T02:44:45Z)
• Dual Process Learning: Controlling Use of In-Context vs. In-Weights Strategies with Weight Forgetting [15.69952375347308]
  Language models have the ability to perform in-context learning (ICL), allowing them to flexibly adapt their behavior based on context. We study structural in-context algorithms in a simple part-of-speech setting using both practical and toy models. We find that active forgetting, a technique that was recently introduced to help models generalize to new languages, forces models to adopt structural in-context learning solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T21:38:20Z)
• Can Large Language Models Understand Context? [17.196362853457412]
  This paper introduces a context understanding benchmark by adapting existing datasets to suit the evaluation of generative models. Experimental results indicate that pre-trained dense models struggle with understanding more nuanced contextual features when compared to state-of-the-art fine-tuned models. As LLM compression holds growing significance in both research and real-world applications, we assess the context understanding of quantized models under in-context-learning settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T18:55:29Z)
• Auto-ICL: In-Context Learning without Human Supervision [93.05202223767463]
  We propose Automatic In-Context Learning framework that enables the model to autonomously generate examples and instructions for problem-solving. With experiments across various models and datasets, results show that model-generated contexts outperform human-annotated contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T07:37:28Z)
• RetICL: Sequential Retrieval of In-Context Examples with Reinforcement Learning [53.52699766206808]
  We propose Retrieval for In-Context Learning (RetICL), a learnable method for modeling and optimally selecting examples sequentially for in-context learning. We evaluate RetICL on math word problem solving and scientific question answering tasks and show that it consistently outperforms or matches and learnable baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T20:15:56Z)
• In-Context Probing: Toward Building Robust Classifiers via Probing Large Language Models [5.5089506884366735]
  In this paper, we propose an alternative approach, which we term In-Context Probing (ICP) Similar to in-context learning, we contextualize the representation of the input with an instruction, but instead of decoding the output prediction, we probe the contextualized representation to predict the label. We show that ICP performs competitive or superior to finetuning and can be particularly helpful to build classifiers on top of smaller models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T15:43:04Z)
• An Explanation of In-context Learning as Implicit Bayesian Inference [117.19809377740188]
  We study the role of the pretraining distribution on the emergence of in-context learning. We prove that in-context learning occurs implicitly via Bayesian inference of the latent concept. We empirically find that scaling model size improves in-context accuracy even when the pretraining loss is the same.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-03T09:12:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.