A Fresh Look at Sanity Checks for Saliency Maps

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.02383v1
• Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 15:47:32 GMT
• Title: A Fresh Look at Sanity Checks for Saliency Maps
• Abstract summary: We propose two modifications to the Model Randomisation Test (MPRT) The former reduces the impact of noise on evaluation outcomes via sampling, while the latter avoids the need for biased similarity measurements. Our experiments show that these modifications enhance the metric reliability, facilitating a more trustworthy deployment of explanation methods.
• Score: 3.371877306561591
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: The Model Parameter Randomisation Test (MPRT) is highly recognised in the eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) community due to its fundamental evaluative criterion: explanations should be sensitive to the parameters of the model they seek to explain. However, recent studies have raised several methodological concerns for the empirical interpretation of MPRT. In response, we propose two modifications to the original test: Smooth MPRT and Efficient MPRT. The former reduces the impact of noise on evaluation outcomes via sampling, while the latter avoids the need for biased similarity measurements by re-interpreting the test through the increase in explanation complexity after full model randomisation. Our experiments show that these modifications enhance the metric reliability, facilitating a more trustworthy deployment of explanation methods.

Related papers

• Counterfactual Explanations for Deep Two-Sample Testing [6.491513951159988]
  Two-sample testing is a fundamental tool for detecting distributional differences across scientific domains.<n>Recent deep two-sample tests improve sensitivity in these settings by learning informative representations.<n>We propose a counterfactual explanation framework for deep two-sample testing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-29T14:17:08Z)
• When prompt perturbations break your A/B test: A valid statistical test for generative surveying [0.3366038232188622]
  We show that standard hypothesis tests, including the sign test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test, are invalid under a statistical model for generative surveying.<n>We propose a permutation test that is valid under this model and formally characterize the conditions under which standard tests fail.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-26T00:35:58Z)
• Sharp Convergence Rates for Masked Diffusion Models [53.117058231393834]
  We develop a total-variation based analysis for the Euler method that overcomes limitations.<n>Our results relax assumptions on score estimation, improve parameter dependencies, and establish convergence guarantees.<n>Overall, our analysis introduces a direct TV-based error decomposition along the CTMC trajectory and a decoupling-based path-wise analysis for FHS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-26T00:47:51Z)
• Beyond Raw Detection Scores: Markov-Informed Calibration for Boosting Machine-Generated Text Detection [105.14032334647932]
  Machine-generated texts (MGTs) pose risks such as disinformation and phishing, highlighting the need for reliable detection.<n> Metric-based methods, which extract statistically distinguishable features of MGTs, are often more practical than complex model-based methods that are prone to overfitting.<n>We propose a Markov-informed score calibration strategy that models two relationships of context detection scores that may aid calibration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-08T16:06:12Z)
• Model Correlation Detection via Random Selection Probing [62.093777777813756]
  Existing similarity-based methods require access to model parameters or produce scores without thresholds.<n>We introduce Random Selection Probing (RSP), a hypothesis-testing framework that formulates model correlation detection as a statistical test.<n>RSP produces rigorous p-values that quantify evidence of correlation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T01:40:26Z)
• Spatial Reasoning with Denoising Models [49.83744014336816]
  We introduce a framework to perform reasoning over sets of continuous variables via denoising generative models. We demonstrate for the first time, that order of generation can successfully be predicted by the denoising network itself.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-28T14:08:30Z)
• Uncertainty-Calibrated Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgetting [55.17761802332469]
  Test-time adaptation (TTA) seeks to tackle potential distribution shifts between training and test data by adapting a given model w.r.t. any test sample. Prior methods perform backpropagation for each test sample, resulting in unbearable optimization costs to many applications. We propose an Efficient Anti-Forgetting Test-Time Adaptation (EATA) method which develops an active sample selection criterion to identify reliable and non-redundant samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-18T05:49:45Z)
• Sanity Checks Revisited: An Exploration to Repair the Model Parameter Randomisation Test [2.4821303044292895]
  We introduce two adaptations to the Model Randomisation Test (MPRT) These adaptations minimise the impact that noise has on the evaluation results through sampling. The latter circumvents the need for biased similarity measurements by re-interpreting the test through the explanation's rise in complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T09:21:18Z)
• Projection Regret: Reducing Background Bias for Novelty Detection via Diffusion Models [72.07462371883501]
  We propose emphProjection Regret (PR), an efficient novelty detection method that mitigates the bias of non-semantic information. PR computes the perceptual distance between the test image and its diffusion-based projection to detect abnormality. Extensive experiments demonstrate that PR outperforms the prior art of generative-model-based novelty detection methods by a significant margin.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-05T09:44:47Z)
• SMRD: SURE-based Robust MRI Reconstruction with Diffusion Models [76.43625653814911]
  Diffusion models have gained popularity for accelerated MRI reconstruction due to their high sample quality. They can effectively serve as rich data priors while incorporating the forward model flexibly at inference time. We introduce SURE-based MRI Reconstruction with Diffusion models (SMRD) to enhance robustness during testing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T05:05:35Z)
• A Semi-Bayesian Nonparametric Estimator of the Maximum Mean Discrepancy Measure: Applications in Goodness-of-Fit Testing and Generative Adversarial Networks [3.623570119514559]
  We propose a semi-Bayesian nonparametric (semi-BNP) procedure for the goodness-of-fit (GOF) test. Our method introduces a novel Bayesian estimator for the maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) measure. We demonstrate that our proposed test outperforms frequentist MMD-based methods by achieving a lower false rejection and acceptance rate of the null hypothesis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-05T10:36:21Z)
• Piecewise Deterministic Markov Processes for Bayesian Neural Networks [20.865775626533434]
  Inference on modern Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs) often relies on a variational inference treatment, imposing violated assumptions of independence and the form of the posterior. New Piecewise Deterministic Markov Process (PDMP) samplers permit subsampling, though introduce a model specific inhomogenous Poisson Process (IPPs) which is difficult to sample from. This work introduces a new generic and adaptive thinning scheme for sampling from IPPs, and demonstrates how this approach can accelerate the application of PDMPs for inference in BNNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-17T06:38:16Z)
• Shortcomings of Top-Down Randomization-Based Sanity Checks for Evaluations of Deep Neural Network Explanations [67.40641255908443]
  We identify limitations of model-randomization-based sanity checks for the purpose of evaluating explanations. Top-down model randomization preserves scales of forward pass activations with high probability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-22T18:52:38Z)
• Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgetting [60.36499845014649]
  Test-time adaptation seeks to tackle potential distribution shifts between training and testing data. We propose an active sample selection criterion to identify reliable and non-redundant samples. We also introduce a Fisher regularizer to constrain important model parameters from drastic changes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-06T06:39:40Z)
• AdaPT-GMM: Powerful and robust covariate-assisted multiple testing [0.7614628596146599]
  We propose a new empirical Bayes method for co-assisted multiple testing with false discovery rate (FDR) control. Our method refines the adaptive p-value thresholding (AdaPT) procedure by generalizing its masking scheme. We show in extensive simulations and real data examples that our new method, which we call AdaPT-GMM, consistently delivers high power.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-30T05:06:18Z)
• Bayesian Uncertainty Estimation of Learned Variational MRI Reconstruction [63.202627467245584]
  We introduce a Bayesian variational framework to quantify the model-immanent (epistemic) uncertainty. We demonstrate that our approach yields competitive results for undersampled MRI reconstruction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-12T18:08:14Z)
• A Modified Perturbed Sampling Method for Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanation [35.281127405430674]
  Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanation (LIME) is a technique that explains the predictions of any classifier faithfully. This paper proposes a novel Modified Perturbed Sampling operation for LIME (MPS-LIME) In image classification, MPS-LIME converts the superpixel image into an undirected graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-18T09:03:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.