Artificial Intelligence in the Autonomous Navigation of Endovascular Interventions: A Systematic Review

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.03305v1
• Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 09:28:30 GMT
• Title: Artificial Intelligence in the Autonomous Navigation of Endovascular Interventions: A Systematic Review
• Authors: Harry Robertshaw, Lennart Karstensen, Benjamin Jackson, Hadi Sadati, Kawal Rhode, Sebastien Ourselin, Alejandro Granados, Thomas C Booth,
• Abstract summary: Autonomous navigation of devices in endovascular interventions can decrease operation times, improve decision-making during surgery, and reduce operator radiation exposure while increasing access to treatment. This systematic review explores recent literature to assess the impact, challenges, and opportunities artificial intelligence (AI) has for the autonomous endovascular intervention navigation.
• Score: 35.14795071114005
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Purpose: Autonomous navigation of devices in endovascular interventions can decrease operation times, improve decision-making during surgery, and reduce operator radiation exposure while increasing access to treatment. This systematic review explores recent literature to assess the impact, challenges, and opportunities artificial intelligence (AI) has for the autonomous endovascular intervention navigation. Methods: PubMed and IEEEXplore databases were queried. Eligibility criteria included studies investigating the use of AI in enabling the autonomous navigation of catheters/guidewires in endovascular interventions. Following PRISMA, articles were assessed using QUADAS-2. PROSPERO: CRD42023392259. Results: Among 462 studies, fourteen met inclusion criteria. Reinforcement learning (9/14, 64%) and learning from demonstration (7/14, 50%) were used as data-driven models for autonomous navigation. Studies predominantly utilised physical phantoms (10/14, 71%) and in silico (4/14, 29%) models. Experiments within or around the blood vessels of the heart were reported by the majority of studies (10/14, 71%), while simple non-anatomical vessel platforms were used in three studies (3/14, 21%), and the porcine liver venous system in one study. We observed that risk of bias and poor generalisability were present across studies. No procedures were performed on patients in any of the studies reviewed. Studies lacked patient selection criteria, reference standards, and reproducibility, resulting in low clinical evidence levels. Conclusions: AI's potential in autonomous endovascular navigation is promising, but in an experimental proof-of-concept stage, with a technology readiness level of 3. We highlight that reference standards with well-identified performance metrics are crucial to allow for comparisons of data-driven algorithms proposed in the years to come.

Related papers

• Toward AI Autonomous Navigation for Mechanical Thrombectomy using Hierarchical Modular Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning (HM-MARL) [57.65363326406228]
  We propose a Hierarchical Modular Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning framework for autonomous two-device navigation in vitro.<n>HM-MARL was developed to autonomously navigate a guide catheter and guidewire from the femoral artery to the internal carotid artery (ICA)<n>A modular multi-agent approach was used to decompose the complex navigation task into specialized subtasks, each trained using Soft Actor-Critic RL.<n>In vitro, both HM-MARL models successfully navigated 100% of trials from the femoral artery to the right common carotid artery and 80% to the right ICA but failed on the left-side vessel challenge
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-20T23:50:35Z)
• From Task Executors to Research Partners: Evaluating AI Co-Pilots Through Workflow Integration in Biomedical Research [0.16174969956296248]
  This rapid review examines benchmarking practices for AI systems in preclinical biomedical research.<n>A process-oriented evaluation framework is proposed that addresses four critical dimensions absent from current benchmarks.<n>These dimensions are essential for evaluating AI systems as research co-pilots rather than as isolated task executors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-04T14:37:46Z)
• Simulating Viva Voce Examinations to Evaluate Clinical Reasoning in Large Language Models [51.91760712805404]
  We introduce VivaBench, a benchmark for evaluating sequential clinical reasoning in large language models (LLMs)<n>Our dataset consists of 1762 physician-curated clinical vignettes structured as interactive scenarios that simulate a (oral) examination in medical training.<n>Our analysis identified several failure modes that mirror common cognitive errors in clinical practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-11T16:24:35Z)
• A Novel Attention-Augmented Wavelet YOLO System for Real-time Brain Vessel Segmentation on Transcranial Color-coded Doppler [49.03919553747297]
  We propose an AI-powered, real-time CoW auto-segmentation system capable of efficiently capturing cerebral arteries.<n>No prior studies have explored AI-driven cerebrovascular segmentation using Transcranial Color-coded Doppler (TCCD)<n>The proposed AAW-YOLO demonstrated strong performance in segmenting both ipsilateral and contralateral CoW vessels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-19T14:41:22Z)
• Design and Validation of a Responsible Artificial Intelligence-based System for the Referral of Diabetic Retinopathy Patients [65.57160385098935]
  Early detection of Diabetic Retinopathy can reduce the risk of vision loss by up to 95%.<n>We developed RAIS-DR, a Responsible AI System for DR screening that incorporates ethical principles across the AI lifecycle.<n>We evaluated RAIS-DR against the FDA-approved EyeArt system on a local dataset of 1,046 patients, unseen by both systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-17T21:54:11Z)
• Machine learning algorithms to predict the risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review [0.34230991323146376]
  Subarachnoid haemorrhage is a potentially fatal consequence of intracranial aneurysm rupture. Machine learning can be applied to predict the risk of rupture for intracranial aneurysms. However, the evidence does not comprehensively demonstrate superiority to existing practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T03:25:01Z)
• Artificial Intelligence-Informed Handheld Breast Ultrasound for Screening: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Test Accuracy [0.3859048418931631]
  Handheld breast ultrasound (BUS) is a low-cost alternative but requires substantial training. Artificial intelligence (AI) enabled BUS may aid in both the detection (perception) and classification (interpretation) of breast cancer. Findings: 5.7 million BUS images from over 185,000 patients were used for AI training or validation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T19:31:06Z)
• TrialBench: Multi-Modal Artificial Intelligence-Ready Clinical Trial Datasets [57.067409211231244]
  This paper presents meticulously curated AIready datasets covering multi-modal data (e.g., drug molecule, disease code, text, categorical/numerical features) and 8 crucial prediction challenges in clinical trial design. We provide basic validation methods for each task to ensure the datasets' usability and reliability. We anticipate that the availability of such open-access datasets will catalyze the development of advanced AI approaches for clinical trial design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-30T09:13:10Z)
• A Survey of Artificial Intelligence in Gait-Based Neurodegenerative Disease Diagnosis [51.07114445705692]
  neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) traditionally require extensive healthcare resources and human effort for medical diagnosis and monitoring. As a crucial disease-related motor symptom, human gait can be exploited to characterize different NDs. The current advances in artificial intelligence (AI) models enable automatic gait analysis for NDs identification and classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-21T06:44:40Z)
• Artificial intelligence for abnormality detection in high volume neuroimaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis [0.5934394862891423]
  Most studies evaluating artificial intelligence (AI) models that detect abnormalities in neuroimaging are tested on unrepresentative patient cohorts. The aim was to determine the diagnostic test accuracy and summarise the evidence supporting the use of AI models performing first-line, high-volume neuroimaging tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-09T10:12:17Z)
• Evaluating the Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Adverse Drug Reactions among Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [0.0]
  This study aims to assess the performance of artificial intelligence models in predicting adverse drug reactions in patients with cancer. The use of AI in cancer treatment shows great potential, with models demonstrating high specificity and sensitivity in predicting ADRs. However, standardized research and multicenter studies are needed to improve the quality of evidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-06T11:20:28Z)
• A survey of recent methods for addressing AI fairness and bias in biomedicine [48.46929081146017]
  Artificial intelligence systems may perpetuate social inequities or demonstrate biases, such as those based on race or gender. We surveyed recent publications on different debiasing methods in the fields of biomedical natural language processing (NLP) or computer vision (CV) We performed a literature search on PubMed, ACM digital library, and IEEE Xplore of relevant articles published between January 2018 and December 2023 using multiple combinations of keywords. We reviewed other potential methods from the general domain that could be applied to biomedicine to address bias and improve fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T06:38:46Z)
• De-identification of clinical free text using natural language processing: A systematic review of current approaches [48.343430343213896]
  Natural language processing has repeatedly demonstrated its feasibility in automating the de-identification process. Our study aims to provide systematic evidence on how the de-identification of clinical free text has evolved in the last thirteen years.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-28T13:20:41Z)
• Simulation-based Inference for Cardiovascular Models [57.92535897767929]
  We use simulation-based inference to solve the inverse problem of mapping waveforms back to plausible physiological parameters. We perform an in-silico uncertainty analysis of five biomarkers of clinical interest. We study the gap between in-vivo and in-silico with the MIMIC-III waveform database.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-26T02:34:57Z)
• Artificial Intelligence in Ovarian Cancer Histopathology: A Systematic Review [1.832300121391956]
  Methods: A search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and WHO-ICTRP was conducted. Risk of bias was assessed using PROBAST. There were 80 models of interest, including 37 diagnostic models, 22 prognostic models, and 21 models with other diagnostically relevant outcomes. All models were found to be at high or unclear risk of bias overall, with most research having a high risk of bias in the analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-31T12:26:29Z)
• Building Brains: Subvolume Recombination for Data Augmentation in Large Vessel Occlusion Detection [56.67577446132946]
  A large training data set is required for a standard deep learning-based model to learn this strategy from data. We propose an augmentation method that generates artificial training samples by recombining vessel tree segmentations of the hemispheres from different patients. In line with the augmentation scheme, we use a 3D-DenseNet fed with task-specific input, fostering a side-by-side comparison between the hemispheres.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-05T10:31:57Z)
• The pitfalls of using open data to develop deep learning solutions for COVID-19 detection in chest X-rays [64.02097860085202]
  Deep learning models have been developed to identify COVID-19 from chest X-rays. Results have been exceptional when training and testing on open-source data. Data analysis and model evaluations show that the popular open-source dataset COVIDx is not representative of the real clinical problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-14T10:59:11Z)
• A Systematic Review of Natural Language Processing Applied to Radiology Reports [3.600747505433814]
  This study systematically assesses recent literature in NLP applied to radiology reports. Our analysis is based on 21 variables including radiology characteristics, NLP methodology, performance, study, and clinical application characteristics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-18T18:54:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.