Exploring the Potential of Human-LLM Synergy in Advancing Qualitative Analysis: A Case Study on Mental-Illness Stigma

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.05758v1
• Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 13:27:22 GMT
• Title: Exploring the Potential of Human-LLM Synergy in Advancing Qualitative Analysis: A Case Study on Mental-Illness Stigma
• Authors: Han Meng, Yitian Yang, Yunan Li, Jungup Lee, Yi-Chieh Lee,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) can perform qualitative coding within existing schemes, but their potential for collaborative human-LLM discovery is still underexplored. We propose CHALET, a novel methodology that leverages the human-LLM collaboration paradigm to facilitate conceptualization and empower qualitative research.
• Score: 6.593116883521213
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Qualitative analysis is a challenging, yet crucial aspect of advancing research in the field of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). Recent studies show that large language models (LLMs) can perform qualitative coding within existing schemes, but their potential for collaborative human-LLM discovery and new insight generation in qualitative analysis is still underexplored. To bridge this gap and advance qualitative analysis by harnessing the power of LLMs, we propose CHALET, a novel methodology that leverages the human-LLM collaboration paradigm to facilitate conceptualization and empower qualitative research. The CHALET approach involves LLM-supported data collection, performing both human and LLM deductive coding to identify disagreements, and performing collaborative inductive coding on these disagreement cases to derive new conceptual insights. We validated the effectiveness of CHALET through its application to the attribution model of mental-illness stigma, uncovering implicit stigmatization themes on cognitive, emotional and behavioral dimensions. We discuss the implications for future research, methodology, and the transdisciplinary opportunities CHALET presents for the HCI community and beyond.

Related papers

• Large Language Model for Qualitative Research -- A Systematic Mapping Study [3.302912592091359]
  Large Language Models (LLMs), powered by advanced generative AI, have emerged as transformative tools. This study systematically maps the literature on the use of LLMs for qualitative research. Findings reveal that LLMs are utilized across diverse fields, demonstrating the potential to automate processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-18T21:28:00Z)
• 'Simulacrum of Stories': Examining Large Language Models as Qualitative Research Participants [13.693069737188859]
  Recent excitement around generative models has sparked a wave of proposals suggesting the replacement of human participation and labor in research and development. We conducted interviews with 19 qualitative researchers to understand their perspectives on this paradigm shift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-28T18:28:47Z)
• Multimodal Fusion with LLMs for Engagement Prediction in Natural Conversation [70.52558242336988]
  We focus on predicting engagement in dyadic interactions by scrutinizing verbal and non-verbal cues, aiming to detect signs of disinterest or confusion. In this work, we collect a dataset featuring 34 participants engaged in casual dyadic conversations, each providing self-reported engagement ratings at the end of each conversation. We introduce a novel fusion strategy using Large Language Models (LLMs) to integrate multiple behavior modalities into a multimodal transcript''
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-13T18:28:12Z)
• Large Language Models and Cognitive Science: A Comprehensive Review of Similarities, Differences, and Challenges [12.390859712280324]
  This comprehensive review explores the intersection of Large Language Models (LLMs) and cognitive science. We analyze methods for evaluating LLMs cognitive abilities and discuss their potential as cognitive models. We assess cognitive biases and limitations of LLMs, along with proposed methods for improving their performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-04T02:30:12Z)
• Reconciling Methodological Paradigms: Employing Large Language Models as Novice Qualitative Research Assistants in Talent Management Research [1.0949553365997655]
  This study proposes a novel approach by leveraging Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) based Large Language Models (LLMs) for analyzing interview transcripts. The novelty of this work lies in strategizing the research inquiry as one that is augmented by an LLM that serves as a novice research assistant. Our findings demonstrate that the LLM-augmented RAG approach can successfully extract topics of interest, with significant coverage compared to manually generated topics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-20T17:49:51Z)
• Cognitive LLMs: Towards Integrating Cognitive Architectures and Large Language Models for Manufacturing Decision-making [51.737762570776006]
  LLM-ACTR is a novel neuro-symbolic architecture that provides human-aligned and versatile decision-making. Our framework extracts and embeds knowledge of ACT-R's internal decision-making process as latent neural representations. Our experiments on novel Design for Manufacturing tasks show both improved task performance as well as improved grounded decision-making capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-17T11:49:53Z)
• PersLLM: A Personified Training Approach for Large Language Models [66.16513246245401]
  We propose PersLLM, integrating psychology-grounded principles of personality: social practice, consistency, and dynamic development. We incorporate personality traits directly into the model parameters, enhancing the model's resistance to induction, promoting consistency, and supporting the dynamic evolution of personality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T08:13:22Z)
• Evaluating Human-AI Collaboration: A Review and Methodological Framework [4.41358655687435]
  The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in working environments with individuals, known as Human-AI Collaboration (HAIC), has become essential. evaluating HAIC's effectiveness remains challenging due to the complex interaction of components involved. This paper provides a detailed analysis of existing HAIC evaluation approaches and develops a fresh paradigm for more effectively evaluating these systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-09T12:52:22Z)
• Coding for Intelligence from the Perspective of Category [66.14012258680992]
  Coding targets compressing and reconstructing data, and intelligence. Recent trends demonstrate the potential homogeneity of these two fields. We propose a novel problem of Coding for Intelligence from the category theory view.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T07:05:44Z)
• RLHF Deciphered: A Critical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for LLMs [49.386699863989335]
  Training large language models (LLMs) to serve as effective assistants for humans requires careful consideration. A promising approach is reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), which leverages human feedback to update the model in accordance with human preferences. In this paper, we analyze RLHF through the lens of reinforcement learning principles to develop an understanding of its fundamentals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-12T15:54:15Z)
• Large Language Model-based Human-Agent Collaboration for Complex Task Solving [94.3914058341565]
  We introduce the problem of Large Language Models (LLMs)-based human-agent collaboration for complex task-solving. We propose a Reinforcement Learning-based Human-Agent Collaboration method, ReHAC. This approach includes a policy model designed to determine the most opportune stages for human intervention within the task-solving process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T11:03:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.