Solving the enigma: Deriving optimal explanations of deep networks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.10008v1
• Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 11:49:08 GMT
• Title: Solving the enigma: Deriving optimal explanations of deep networks
• Authors: Michail Mamalakis, Antonios Mamalakis, Ingrid Agartz, Lynn Egeland Mørch-Johnsen, Graham Murray, John Suckling, Pietro Lio,
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel framework designed to enhance the explainability of deep networks. Our framework integrates various explanations from established XAI methods and employs a non-explanation to construct an optimal explanation. Our results suggest that optimal explanations based on specific criteria are derivable.
• Score: 3.9584068556746246
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The accelerated progress of artificial intelligence (AI) has popularized deep learning models across domains, yet their inherent opacity poses challenges, notably in critical fields like healthcare, medicine and the geosciences. Explainable AI (XAI) has emerged to shed light on these "black box" models, helping decipher their decision making process. Nevertheless, different XAI methods yield highly different explanations. This inter-method variability increases uncertainty and lowers trust in deep networks' predictions. In this study, for the first time, we propose a novel framework designed to enhance the explainability of deep networks, by maximizing both the accuracy and the comprehensibility of the explanations. Our framework integrates various explanations from established XAI methods and employs a non-linear "explanation optimizer" to construct a unique and optimal explanation. Through experiments on multi-class and binary classification tasks in 2D object and 3D neuroscience imaging, we validate the efficacy of our approach. Our explanation optimizer achieved superior faithfulness scores, averaging 155% and 63% higher than the best performing XAI method in the 3D and 2D applications, respectively. Additionally, our approach yielded lower complexity, increasing comprehensibility. Our results suggest that optimal explanations based on specific criteria are derivable and address the issue of inter-method variability in the current XAI literature.

Related papers

• Does Faithfulness Conflict with Plausibility? An Empirical Study in Explainable AI across NLP Tasks [9.979726030996051]
  We show that Shapley value and LIME could attain greater faithfulness and plausibility. Our findings suggest that rather than optimizing for one dimension at the expense of the other, we could seek to optimize explainability algorithms with dual objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-29T20:28:42Z)
• Explaining Explainability: Towards Deeper Actionable Insights into Deep Learning through Second-order Explainability [70.60433013657693]
  Second-order explainable AI (SOXAI) was recently proposed to extend explainable AI (XAI) from the instance level to the dataset level. We demonstrate for the first time, via example classification and segmentation cases, that eliminating irrelevant concepts from the training set based on actionable insights from SOXAI can enhance a model's performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-14T23:24:01Z)
• Deep learning applied to computational mechanics: A comprehensive review, state of the art, and the classics [77.34726150561087]
  Recent developments in artificial neural networks, particularly deep learning (DL), are reviewed in detail. Both hybrid and pure machine learning (ML) methods are discussed. History and limitations of AI are recounted and discussed, with particular attention at pointing out misstatements or misconceptions of the classics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-18T02:03:00Z)
• Exploring the Trade-off between Plausibility, Change Intensity and Adversarial Power in Counterfactual Explanations using Multi-objective Optimization [73.89239820192894]
  We argue that automated counterfactual generation should regard several aspects of the produced adversarial instances. We present a novel framework for the generation of counterfactual examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T15:02:53Z)
• Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Bayesian Neural Networks: Towards trustworthy predictions of ocean dynamics [0.0]
  The trustworthiness of neural networks is often challenged because they lack the ability to express uncertainty and explain their skill. This can be problematic given the increasing use of neural networks in high stakes decision-making such as in climate change applications. We address both issues by successfully implementing a Bayesian Neural Network (BNN), where parameters are distributions rather than deterministic, and applying novel implementations of explainable AI (XAI) techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-30T08:35:57Z)
• Deep Learning Reproducibility and Explainable AI (XAI) [9.13755431537592]
  The nondeterminism of Deep Learning (DL) training algorithms and its influence on the explainability of neural network (NN) models are investigated. To discuss the issue, two convolutional neural networks (CNN) have been trained and their results compared.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-23T12:06:20Z)
• Visualizing the Diversity of Representations Learned by Bayesian Neural Networks [5.660714085843854]
  We investigate how XAI methods can be used for exploring and visualizing the diversity of feature representations learned by Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs) Our work provides new insights into the emphposterior distribution in terms of human-understandable feature information with regard to the underlying decision making strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-26T10:40:55Z)
• Evaluating Explainable Artificial Intelligence Methods for Multi-label Deep Learning Classification Tasks in Remote Sensing [0.0]
  We develop deep learning models with state-of-the-art performance in benchmark datasets. Ten XAI methods were employed towards understanding and interpreting models' predictions. Occlusion, Grad-CAM and Lime were the most interpretable and reliable XAI methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-03T11:13:14Z)
• Interpretable Detail-Fidelity Attention Network for Single Image Super-Resolution [89.1947690981471]
  We propose a purposeful and interpretable detail-fidelity attention network to progressively process smoothes and details in divide-and-conquer manner. Particularly, we propose a Hessian filtering for interpretable feature representation which is high-profile for detail inference. Experiments demonstrate that the proposed methods achieve superior performances over the state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-28T08:31:23Z)
• Explainability in Deep Reinforcement Learning [68.8204255655161]
  We review recent works in the direction to attain Explainable Reinforcement Learning (XRL) In critical situations where it is essential to justify and explain the agent's behaviour, better explainability and interpretability of RL models could help gain scientific insight on the inner workings of what is still considered a black box.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-15T10:11:42Z)
• Binary Neural Networks: A Survey [126.67799882857656]
  The binary neural network serves as a promising technique for deploying deep models on resource-limited devices. The binarization inevitably causes severe information loss, and even worse, its discontinuity brings difficulty to the optimization of the deep network. We present a survey of these algorithms, mainly categorized into the native solutions directly conducting binarization, and the optimized ones using techniques like minimizing the quantization error, improving the network loss function, and reducing the gradient error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-31T16:47:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.