Towards Real-world Debiasing: Rethinking Evaluation, Challenge, and Solution

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.15240v4
• Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 08:16:49 GMT
• Title: Towards Real-world Debiasing: Rethinking Evaluation, Challenge, and Solution
• Authors: Peng Kuang, Zhibo Wang, Zhixuan Chu, Jingyi Wang, Kui Ren,
• Abstract summary: We introduce two novel real-world-inspired biases to bridge this gap and build a systematic evaluation framework for real-world debiasing.<n>We propose a simple yet effective approach named Debias in Destruction (DiD) to address the challenge.
• Score: 17.080528126651977
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Spurious correlations in training data significantly hinder the generalization capability of machine learning models when faced with distribution shifts, leading to the proposition of numberous debiasing methods. However, it remains to be asked: \textit{Do existing benchmarks for debiasing really represent biases in the real world?} Recent works attempt to address such concerns by sampling from real-world data (instead of synthesizing) according to some predefined biased distributions to ensure the realism of individual samples. However, the realism of the biased distribution is more critical yet challenging and underexplored due to the complexity of real-world bias distributions. To tackle the problem, we propose a fine-grained framework for analyzing biased distributions, based on which we empirically and theoretically identify key characteristics of biased distributions in the real world that are poorly represented by existing benchmarks. Towards applicable debiasing in the real world, we further introduce two novel real-world-inspired biases to bridge this gap and build a systematic evaluation framework for real-world debiasing, RDBench\footnote{RDBench: Code to be released. Preliminary version in supplementary material for anonimized review.}. Furthermore, focusing on the practical setting of debiasing w/o bias label, we find real-world biases pose a novel \textit{Sparse bias capturing} challenge to the existing paradigm. We propose a simple yet effective approach named Debias in Destruction (DiD), to address the challenge, whose effectiveness is validated with extensive experiments on 8 datasets of various biased distributions.

Related papers

• Rethinking Relation Extraction: Beyond Shortcuts to Generalization with a Debiased Benchmark [53.876493664396506]
  Benchmarks are crucial for evaluating machine learning algorithm performance, facilitating comparison and identifying superior solutions. This paper addresses the issue of entity bias in relation extraction tasks, where models tend to rely on entity mentions rather than context. We propose a debiased relation extraction benchmark DREB that breaks the pseudo-correlation between entity mentions and relation types through entity replacement. To establish a new baseline on DREB, we introduce MixDebias, a debiasing method combining data-level and model training-level techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-02T17:01:06Z)
• Editable Fairness: Fine-Grained Bias Mitigation in Language Models [52.66450426729818]
  We propose a novel debiasing approach, Fairness Stamp (FAST), which enables fine-grained calibration of individual social biases. FAST surpasses state-of-the-art baselines with superior debiasing performance. This highlights the potential of fine-grained debiasing strategies to achieve fairness in large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-07T17:14:58Z)
• Looking at Model Debiasing through the Lens of Anomaly Detection [11.113718994341733]
  Deep neural networks are sensitive to bias in the data. We propose a new bias identification method based on anomaly detection. We reach state-of-the-art performance on synthetic and real benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-24T17:30:21Z)
• Bias-Conflict Sample Synthesis and Adversarial Removal Debias Strategy for Temporal Sentence Grounding in Video [67.24316233946381]
  Temporal Sentence Grounding in Video (TSGV) is troubled by dataset bias issue. We propose the bias-conflict sample synthesis and adversarial removal debias strategy (BSSARD)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-15T09:59:43Z)
• GPTBIAS: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Bias in Large Language Models [83.30078426829627]
  Large language models (LLMs) have gained popularity and are being widely adopted by a large user community. The existing evaluation methods have many constraints, and their results exhibit a limited degree of interpretability. We propose a bias evaluation framework named GPTBIAS that leverages the high performance of LLMs to assess bias in models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-11T12:02:14Z)
• Improving Bias Mitigation through Bias Experts in Natural Language Understanding [10.363406065066538]
  We propose a new debiasing framework that introduces binary classifiers between the auxiliary model and the main model. Our proposed strategy improves the bias identification ability of the auxiliary model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-06T16:15:00Z)
• Causality and Independence Enhancement for Biased Node Classification [56.38828085943763]
  We propose a novel Causality and Independence Enhancement (CIE) framework, applicable to various graph neural networks (GNNs) Our approach estimates causal and spurious features at the node representation level and mitigates the influence of spurious correlations. Our approach CIE not only significantly enhances the performance of GNNs but outperforms state-of-the-art debiased node classification methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-14T13:56:24Z)
• Echoes: Unsupervised Debiasing via Pseudo-bias Labeling in an Echo Chamber [17.034228910493056]
  This paper presents experimental analyses revealing that the existing biased models overfit to bias-conflicting samples in the training data. We propose a straightforward and effective method called Echoes, which trains a biased model and a target model with a different strategy. Our approach achieves superior debiasing results compared to the existing baselines on both synthetic and real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-06T13:13:18Z)
• Balancing Unobserved Confounding with a Few Unbiased Ratings in Debiased Recommendations [4.960902915238239]
  We propose a theoretically guaranteed model-agnostic balancing approach that can be applied to any existing debiasing method. The proposed approach makes full use of unbiased data by alternatively correcting model parameters learned with biased data, and adaptively learning balance coefficients of biased samples for further debiasing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-17T08:56:55Z)
• Delving into Identify-Emphasize Paradigm for Combating Unknown Bias [52.76758938921129]
  We propose an effective bias-conflicting scoring method (ECS) to boost the identification accuracy. We also propose gradient alignment (GA) to balance the contributions of the mined bias-aligned and bias-conflicting samples. Experiments are conducted on multiple datasets in various settings, demonstrating that the proposed solution can mitigate the impact of unknown biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-22T14:50:24Z)
• Systematic Evaluation of Predictive Fairness [60.0947291284978]
  Mitigating bias in training on biased datasets is an important open problem. We examine the performance of various debiasing methods across multiple tasks. We find that data conditions have a strong influence on relative model performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-17T05:40:13Z)
• Unsupervised Learning of Unbiased Visual Representations [10.871587311621974]
  Deep neural networks are known for their inability to learn robust representations when biases exist in the dataset. We propose a fully unsupervised debiasing framework, consisting of three steps. We employ state-of-the-art supervised debiasing techniques to obtain an unbiased model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-26T10:51:50Z)
• Information-Theoretic Bias Reduction via Causal View of Spurious Correlation [71.9123886505321]
  We propose an information-theoretic bias measurement technique through a causal interpretation of spurious correlation. We present a novel debiasing framework against the algorithmic bias, which incorporates a bias regularization loss. The proposed bias measurement and debiasing approaches are validated in diverse realistic scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-10T01:19:31Z)
• General Greedy De-bias Learning [163.65789778416172]
  We propose a General Greedy De-bias learning framework (GGD), which greedily trains the biased models and the base model like gradient descent in functional space. GGD can learn a more robust base model under the settings of both task-specific biased models with prior knowledge and self-ensemble biased model without prior knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-20T14:47:32Z)
• Learning Debiased Models with Dynamic Gradient Alignment and Bias-conflicting Sample Mining [39.00256193731365]
  Deep neural networks notoriously suffer from dataset biases which are detrimental to model robustness, generalization and fairness. We propose a two-stage debiasing scheme to combat against the intractable unknown biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-25T14:50:10Z)
• Towards Debiasing NLU Models from Unknown Biases [70.31427277842239]
  NLU models often exploit biases to achieve high dataset-specific performance without properly learning the intended task. We present a self-debiasing framework that prevents models from mainly utilizing biases without knowing them in advance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-25T15:49:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.