Differentiation of Multi-objective Data-driven Decision Pipeline

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.00779v1
• Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2024 15:42:03 GMT
• Title: Differentiation of Multi-objective Data-driven Decision Pipeline
• Authors: Peng Li, Lixia Wu, Chaoqun Feng, Haoyuan Hu, Lei Fu, Jieping Ye,
• Abstract summary: Real-world scenarios frequently involve multi-objective data-driven optimization problems. Traditional two-stage methods apply a machine learning model to estimate problem coefficients, followed by invoking a solver to tackle the predicted optimization problem. Recent efforts have focused on end-to-end training of predictive models that use decision loss derived from the downstream optimization problem.
• Score: 34.577809430781144
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Real-world scenarios frequently involve multi-objective data-driven optimization problems, characterized by unknown problem coefficients and multiple conflicting objectives. Traditional two-stage methods independently apply a machine learning model to estimate problem coefficients, followed by invoking a solver to tackle the predicted optimization problem. The independent use of optimization solvers and prediction models may lead to suboptimal performance due to mismatches between their objectives. Recent efforts have focused on end-to-end training of predictive models that use decision loss derived from the downstream optimization problem. However, these methods have primarily focused on single-objective optimization problems, thus limiting their applicability. We aim to propose a multi-objective decision-focused approach to address this gap. In order to better align with the inherent properties of multi-objective optimization problems, we propose a set of novel loss functions. These loss functions are designed to capture the discrepancies between predicted and true decision problems, considering solution space, objective space, and decision quality, named landscape loss, Pareto set loss, and decision loss, respectively. Our experimental results demonstrate that our proposed method significantly outperforms traditional two-stage methods and most current decision-focused methods.

Related papers

• Learning Joint Models of Prediction and Optimization [56.04498536842065]
  Predict-Then-Then framework uses machine learning models to predict unknown parameters of an optimization problem from features before solving. This paper proposes an alternative method, in which optimal solutions are learned directly from the observable features by joint predictive models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-07T19:52:14Z)
• Diffusion Models as Constrained Samplers for Optimization with Unknown Constraints [42.47298301874283]
  We propose to perform optimization within the data manifold using diffusion models. Depending on the differentiability of the objective function, we propose two different sampling methods. Our method achieves better or comparable performance with previous state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T03:09:12Z)
• End-to-End Learning for Fair Multiobjective Optimization Under Uncertainty [55.04219793298687]
  The Predict-Then-Forecast (PtO) paradigm in machine learning aims to maximize downstream decision quality. This paper extends the PtO methodology to optimization problems with nondifferentiable Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA) objectives. It shows how optimization of OWA functions can be effectively integrated with parametric prediction for fair and robust optimization under uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T16:33:35Z)
• Data-Efficient Interactive Multi-Objective Optimization Using ParEGO [6.042269506496206]
  Multi-objective optimization seeks to identify a set of non-dominated solutions that provide optimal trade-offs among competing objectives. In practical applications, decision-makers (DMs) will select a single solution that aligns with their preferences to be implemented. We propose two novel algorithms that efficiently locate the most preferred region of the Pareto front in expensive-to-evaluate problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T15:55:51Z)
• Predict-Then-Optimize by Proxy: Learning Joint Models of Prediction and Optimization [59.386153202037086]
  Predict-Then- framework uses machine learning models to predict unknown parameters of an optimization problem from features before solving. This approach can be inefficient and requires handcrafted, problem-specific rules for backpropagation through the optimization step. This paper proposes an alternative method, in which optimal solutions are learned directly from the observable features by predictive models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T01:32:06Z)
• Efficient Learning of Decision-Making Models: A Penalty Block Coordinate Descent Algorithm for Data-Driven Inverse Optimization [12.610576072466895]
  We consider the inverse problem where we use prior decision data to uncover the underlying decision-making process. This statistical learning problem is referred to as data-driven inverse optimization. We propose an efficient block coordinate descent-based algorithm to solve large problem instances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-27T12:52:56Z)
• A Surrogate Objective Framework for Prediction+Optimization with Soft Constraints [29.962390392493507]
  Decision-focused prediction approaches, such as SPO+ and direct optimization, have been proposed to fill this gap. This paper proposes a novel analytically differentiable surrogate objective framework for real-world linear and semi-definite negative quadratic programming problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-22T17:09:57Z)
• Learning MDPs from Features: Predict-Then-Optimize for Sequential Decision Problems by Reinforcement Learning [52.74071439183113]
  We study the predict-then-optimize framework in the context of sequential decision problems (formulated as MDPs) solved via reinforcement learning. Two significant computational challenges arise in applying decision-focused learning to MDPs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-06T23:53:31Z)
• Modeling the Second Player in Distributionally Robust Optimization [90.25995710696425]
  We argue for the use of neural generative models to characterize the worst-case distribution. This approach poses a number of implementation and optimization challenges. We find that the proposed approach yields models that are more robust than comparable baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-18T14:26:26Z)
• Automatically Learning Compact Quality-aware Surrogates for Optimization Problems [55.94450542785096]
  Solving optimization problems with unknown parameters requires learning a predictive model to predict the values of the unknown parameters and then solving the problem using these values. Recent work has shown that including the optimization problem as a layer in a complex training model pipeline results in predictions of iteration of unobserved decision making. We show that we can improve solution quality by learning a low-dimensional surrogate model of a large optimization problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-18T19:11:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.