Replicability in High Dimensional Statistics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.02628v1
• Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 00:06:42 GMT
• Title: Replicability in High Dimensional Statistics
• Authors: Max Hopkins, Russell Impagliazzo, Daniel Kane, Sihan Liu, Christopher Ye,
• Abstract summary: We study the computational and statistical cost of replicability for several fundamental high dimensional statistical tasks. Our main contribution establishes a computational and statistical equivalence between optimal replicable algorithms and high dimensional isoperimetrics.
• Score: 18.543059748500358
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The replicability crisis is a major issue across nearly all areas of empirical science, calling for the formal study of replicability in statistics. Motivated in this context, [Impagliazzo, Lei, Pitassi, and Sorrell STOC 2022] introduced the notion of replicable learning algorithms, and gave basic procedures for $1$-dimensional tasks including statistical queries. In this work, we study the computational and statistical cost of replicability for several fundamental high dimensional statistical tasks, including multi-hypothesis testing and mean estimation. Our main contribution establishes a computational and statistical equivalence between optimal replicable algorithms and high dimensional isoperimetric tilings. As a consequence, we obtain matching sample complexity upper and lower bounds for replicable mean estimation of distributions with bounded covariance, resolving an open problem of [Bun, Gaboardi, Hopkins, Impagliazzo, Lei, Pitassi, Sivakumar, and Sorrell, STOC2023] and for the $N$-Coin Problem, resolving a problem of [Karbasi, Velegkas, Yang, and Zhou, NeurIPS2023] up to log factors. While our equivalence is computational, allowing us to shave log factors in sample complexity from the best known efficient algorithms, efficient isoperimetric tilings are not known. To circumvent this, we introduce several relaxed paradigms that do allow for sample and computationally efficient algorithms, including allowing pre-processing, adaptivity, and approximate replicability. In these cases we give efficient algorithms matching or beating the best known sample complexity for mean estimation and the coin problem, including a generic procedure that reduces the standard quadratic overhead of replicability to linear in expectation.

Related papers

• Unveiling the Statistical Foundations of Chain-of-Thought Prompting Methods [59.779795063072655]
  Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting and its variants have gained popularity as effective methods for solving multi-step reasoning problems. We analyze CoT prompting from a statistical estimation perspective, providing a comprehensive characterization of its sample complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-25T04:07:18Z)
• Computational-Statistical Gaps in Gaussian Single-Index Models [77.1473134227844]
  Single-Index Models are high-dimensional regression problems with planted structure. We show that computationally efficient algorithms, both within the Statistical Query (SQ) and the Low-Degree Polynomial (LDP) framework, necessarily require $Omega(dkstar/2)$ samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T18:50:19Z)
• Optimal Multi-Distribution Learning [88.3008613028333]
  Multi-distribution learning seeks to learn a shared model that minimizes the worst-case risk across $k$ distinct data distributions. We propose a novel algorithm that yields an varepsilon-optimal randomized hypothesis with a sample complexity on the order of (d+k)/varepsilon2.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-08T16:06:29Z)
• Geometry-Aware Approaches for Balancing Performance and Theoretical Guarantees in Linear Bandits [6.907555940790131]
  Thompson sampling and Greedy demonstrate promising empirical performance, yet this contrasts with their pessimistic theoretical regret bounds. We propose a new data-driven technique that tracks the geometric properties of the uncertainty ellipsoid. We identify and course-correct" problem instances in which the base algorithms perform poorly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-26T17:38:45Z)
• An Optimization-based Deep Equilibrium Model for Hyperspectral Image Deconvolution with Convergence Guarantees [71.57324258813675]
  We propose a novel methodology for addressing the hyperspectral image deconvolution problem. A new optimization problem is formulated, leveraging a learnable regularizer in the form of a neural network. The derived iterative solver is then expressed as a fixed-point calculation problem within the Deep Equilibrium framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-10T08:25:16Z)
• Replicable Reinforcement Learning [15.857503103543308]
  We provide a provably replicable algorithm for parallel value iteration, and a provably replicable version of R-max in the episodic setting. These are the first formal replicability results for control problems, which present different challenges for replication than batch learning settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T16:05:15Z)
• Stability is Stable: Connections between Replicability, Privacy, and Adaptive Generalization [26.4468964378511]
  A replicable algorithm gives the same output with high probability when its randomness is fixed. Using replicable algorithms for data analysis can facilitate the verification of published results. We establish new connections and separations between replicability and standard notions of algorithmic stability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-22T21:35:50Z)
• Best Subset Selection in Reduced Rank Regression [1.4699455652461724]
  We show that our algorithm can achieve the reduced rank estimation with a significant probability. The numerical studies and an application in the cancer studies demonstrate effectiveness and scalability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-29T02:51:15Z)
• Optimal Algorithms for Stochastic Complementary Composite Minimization [55.26935605535377]
  Inspired by regularization techniques in statistics and machine learning, we study complementary composite minimization. We provide novel excess risk bounds, both in expectation and with high probability. Our algorithms are nearly optimal, which we prove via novel lower complexity bounds for this class of problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-03T12:40:24Z)
• Instability, Computational Efficiency and Statistical Accuracy [101.32305022521024]
  We develop a framework that yields statistical accuracy based on interplay between the deterministic convergence rate of the algorithm at the population level, and its degree of (instability) when applied to an empirical object based on $n$ samples. We provide applications of our general results to several concrete classes of models, including Gaussian mixture estimation, non-linear regression models, and informative non-response models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-22T22:30:52Z)
• Statistically Guided Divide-and-Conquer for Sparse Factorization of Large Matrix [2.345015036605934]
  We formulate the statistical problem as a sparse factor regression and tackle it with a divide-conquer approach. In the first stage division, we consider both latent parallel approaches for simplifying the task into a set of co-parsesparserank estimation (CURE) problems. In the second stage division, we innovate a stagewise learning technique, consisting of a sequence simple incremental paths, to efficiently trace out the whole solution of CURE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-17T19:12:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.