PairNet: Training with Observed Pairs to Estimate Individual Treatment Effect

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03864v1
• Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:50:16 GMT
• Title: PairNet: Training with Observed Pairs to Estimate Individual Treatment Effect
• Authors: Lokesh Nagalapatti, Pranava Singhal, Avishek Ghosh, Sunita Sarawagi,
• Abstract summary: PairNet is a novel ITE estimation training strategy that minimizes losses over pairs of examples based on factual observed outcomes. It achieves significantly lower ITE error compared to the baselines.
• Score: 28.08128152771846
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Given a dataset of individuals each described by a covariate vector, a treatment, and an observed outcome on the treatment, the goal of the individual treatment effect (ITE) estimation task is to predict outcome changes resulting from a change in treatment. A fundamental challenge is that in the observational data, a covariate's outcome is observed only under one treatment, whereas we need to infer the difference in outcomes under two different treatments. Several existing approaches address this issue through training with inferred pseudo-outcomes, but their success relies on the quality of these pseudo-outcomes. We propose PairNet, a novel ITE estimation training strategy that minimizes losses over pairs of examples based on their factual observed outcomes. Theoretical analysis for binary treatments reveals that PairNet is a consistent estimator of ITE risk, and achieves smaller generalization error than baseline models. Empirical comparison with thirteen existing methods across eight benchmarks, covering both discrete and continuous treatments, shows that PairNet achieves significantly lower ITE error compared to the baselines. Also, it is model-agnostic and easy to implement.

Related papers

• Continuous Treatment Effect Estimation Using Gradient Interpolation and Kernel Smoothing [43.259723628010896]
  We advocate the direct approach of augmenting training individuals with independently sampled treatments and inferred counterfactual outcomes. We evaluate our method on five benchmarks and show that our method outperforms six state-of-the-art methods on the counterfactual estimation error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-27T15:52:58Z)
• Estimation of individual causal effects in network setup for multiple treatments [4.53340898566495]
  We study the problem of estimation of Individual Treatment Effects (ITE) in the context of multiple treatments and observational data. We employ Graph Convolutional Networks (GCN) to learn a shared representation of the confounders. Our approach utilizes separate neural networks to infer potential outcomes for each treatment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-18T06:07:45Z)
• Counterfactual Data Augmentation with Contrastive Learning [27.28511396131235]
  We introduce a model-agnostic data augmentation method that imputes the counterfactual outcomes for a selected subset of individuals. We use contrastive learning to learn a representation space and a similarity measure such that in the learned representation space close individuals identified by the learned similarity measure have similar potential outcomes. This property ensures reliable imputation of counterfactual outcomes for the individuals with close neighbors from the alternative treatment group.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-07T00:36:51Z)
• A Unified Generalization Analysis of Re-Weighting and Logit-Adjustment for Imbalanced Learning [129.63326990812234]
  We propose a technique named data-dependent contraction to capture how modified losses handle different classes. On top of this technique, a fine-grained generalization bound is established for imbalanced learning, which helps reveal the mystery of re-weighting and logit-adjustment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-07T09:15:08Z)
• Generalization bounds and algorithms for estimating conditional average treatment effect of dosage [13.867315751451494]
  We investigate the task of estimating the conditional average causal effect of treatment-dosage pairs from a combination of observational data and assumptions on the causal relationships in the underlying system. This has been a longstanding challenge for fields of study such as epidemiology or economics that require a treatment-dosage pair to make decisions. We show empirically new state-of-the-art performance results across several benchmark datasets for this problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-29T15:26:59Z)
• Two-Stage TMLE to Reduce Bias and Improve Efficiency in Cluster Randomized Trials [0.0]
  Cluster randomized trials (CRTs) randomly assign an intervention to groups of individuals, and measure outcomes on individuals in those groups. Findings are often missing for some individuals within clusters. CRTs often randomize limited numbers of clusters, resulting in chance imbalances on baseline outcome predictors between arms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-29T21:47:30Z)
• On Inductive Biases for Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimation [91.3755431537592]
  We investigate how to exploit structural similarities of an individual's potential outcomes (POs) under different treatments. We compare three end-to-end learning strategies to overcome this problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T16:30:46Z)
• Semi-supervised Contrastive Learning with Similarity Co-calibration [72.38187308270135]
  We propose a novel training strategy, termed as Semi-supervised Contrastive Learning (SsCL) SsCL combines the well-known contrastive loss in self-supervised learning with the cross entropy loss in semi-supervised learning. We show that SsCL produces more discriminative representation and is beneficial to few shot learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-16T09:13:56Z)
• Scalable Personalised Item Ranking through Parametric Density Estimation [53.44830012414444]
  Learning from implicit feedback is challenging because of the difficult nature of the one-class problem. Most conventional methods use a pairwise ranking approach and negative samplers to cope with the one-class problem. We propose a learning-to-rank approach, which achieves convergence speed comparable to the pointwise counterpart.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-11T03:38:16Z)
• Learning Decomposed Representation for Counterfactual Inference [53.36586760485262]
  The fundamental problem in treatment effect estimation from observational data is confounder identification and balancing. Most of the previous methods realized confounder balancing by treating all observed pre-treatment variables as confounders, ignoring further identifying confounders and non-confounders. We propose a synergistic learning framework to 1) identify confounders by learning representations of both confounders and non-confounders, 2) balance confounder with sample re-weighting technique, and simultaneously 3) estimate the treatment effect in observational studies via counterfactual inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-12T09:50:42Z)
• Generalization Bounds and Representation Learning for Estimation of Potential Outcomes and Causal Effects [61.03579766573421]
  We study estimation of individual-level causal effects, such as a single patient's response to alternative medication. We devise representation learning algorithms that minimize our bound, by regularizing the representation's induced treatment group distance. We extend these algorithms to simultaneously learn a weighted representation to further reduce treatment group distances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-21T10:16:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.