Two-Stage TMLE to Reduce Bias and Improve Efficiency in Cluster Randomized Trials

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.15737v1
• Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 21:47:30 GMT
• Title: Two-Stage TMLE to Reduce Bias and Improve Efficiency in Cluster Randomized Trials
• Authors: Laura B. Balzer, Mark van der Laan, James Ayieko, Moses Kamya, Gabriel Chamie, Joshua Schwab, Diane V. Havlir, Maya L. Petersen
• Abstract summary: Cluster randomized trials (CRTs) randomly assign an intervention to groups of individuals, and measure outcomes on individuals in those groups. Findings are often missing for some individuals within clusters. CRTs often randomize limited numbers of clusters, resulting in chance imbalances on baseline outcome predictors between arms.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Cluster randomized trials (CRTs) randomly assign an intervention to groups of individuals (e.g., clinics or communities), and measure outcomes on individuals in those groups. While offering many advantages, this experimental design introduces challenges that are only partially addressed by existing analytic approaches. First, outcomes are often missing for some individuals within clusters. Failing to appropriately adjust for differential outcome measurement can result in biased estimates and inference. Second, CRTs often randomize limited numbers of clusters, resulting in chance imbalances on baseline outcome predictors between arms. Failing to adaptively adjust for these imbalances and other predictive covariates can result in efficiency losses. To address these methodological gaps, we propose and evaluate a novel two-stage targeted minimum loss-based estimator (TMLE) to adjust for baseline covariates in a manner that optimizes precision, after controlling for baseline and post-baseline causes of missing outcomes. Finite sample simulations illustrate that our approach can nearly eliminate bias due to differential outcome measurement, while other common CRT estimators yield misleading results and inferences. Application to real data from the SEARCH community randomized trial demonstrates the gains in efficiency afforded through adaptive adjustment for cluster-level covariates, after controlling for missingness on individual-level outcomes.

Related papers

• PairNet: Training with Observed Pairs to Estimate Individual Treatment Effect [28.08128152771846]
  PairNet is a novel ITE estimation training strategy that minimizes losses over pairs of examples based on factual observed outcomes. It achieves significantly lower ITE error compared to the baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T08:50:16Z)
• Estimating treatment effects from single-arm trials via latent-variable modeling [14.083487062917085]
  Single-arm trials, where all patients belong to the treatment group, can be a viable alternative but require access to an external control group. We propose an identifiable deep latent-variable model for this scenario. Our results show improved performance both for direct treatment effect estimation as well as for effect estimation via patient matching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T10:12:54Z)
• Modeling the Q-Diversity in a Min-max Play Game for Robust Optimization [61.39201891894024]
  Group distributionally robust optimization (group DRO) can minimize the worst-case loss over pre-defined groups. We reformulate the group DRO framework by proposing Q-Diversity. Characterized by an interactive training mode, Q-Diversity relaxes the group identification from annotation into direct parameterization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-20T07:02:27Z)
• Generalization bounds and algorithms for estimating conditional average treatment effect of dosage [13.867315751451494]
  We investigate the task of estimating the conditional average causal effect of treatment-dosage pairs from a combination of observational data and assumptions on the causal relationships in the underlying system. This has been a longstanding challenge for fields of study such as epidemiology or economics that require a treatment-dosage pair to make decisions. We show empirically new state-of-the-art performance results across several benchmark datasets for this problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-29T15:26:59Z)
• Distributionally Robust Models with Parametric Likelihood Ratios [123.05074253513935]
  Three simple ideas allow us to train models with DRO using a broader class of parametric likelihood ratios. We find that models trained with the resulting parametric adversaries are consistently more robust to subpopulation shifts when compared to other DRO approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-13T12:43:12Z)
• Selective Regression Under Fairness Criteria [30.672082160544996]
  In some cases, the performance of minority group can decrease while we reduce the coverage. We show that such an unwanted behavior can be avoided if we can construct features satisfying the sufficiency criterion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-28T19:05:12Z)
• Near-optimal inference in adaptive linear regression [60.08422051718195]
  Even simple methods like least squares can exhibit non-normal behavior when data is collected in an adaptive manner. We propose a family of online debiasing estimators to correct these distributional anomalies in at least squares estimation. We demonstrate the usefulness of our theory via applications to multi-armed bandit, autoregressive time series estimation, and active learning with exploration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-05T21:05:11Z)
• Machine Learning for Variance Reduction in Online Experiments [1.9181913148426697]
  We propose a machine learning regression-adjusted treatment effect estimator, which we call MLRATE. MLRATE uses machine learning predictors of the outcome to reduce estimator variance. In A/A tests, for a set of 48 outcome metrics commonly monitored in Facebook experiments, the estimator has over 70% lower variance than the simple difference-in-means estimator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-14T09:35:54Z)
• Scalable Personalised Item Ranking through Parametric Density Estimation [53.44830012414444]
  Learning from implicit feedback is challenging because of the difficult nature of the one-class problem. Most conventional methods use a pairwise ranking approach and negative samplers to cope with the one-class problem. We propose a learning-to-rank approach, which achieves convergence speed comparable to the pointwise counterpart.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-11T03:38:16Z)
• Deconfounding Scores: Feature Representations for Causal Effect Estimation with Weak Overlap [140.98628848491146]
  We introduce deconfounding scores, which induce better overlap without biasing the target of estimation. We show that deconfounding scores satisfy a zero-covariance condition that is identifiable in observed data. In particular, we show that this technique could be an attractive alternative to standard regularizations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-12T18:50:11Z)
• Increasing the efficiency of randomized trial estimates via linear adjustment for a prognostic score [59.75318183140857]
  Estimating causal effects from randomized experiments is central to clinical research. Most methods for historical borrowing achieve reductions in variance by sacrificing strict type-I error rate control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-17T21:10:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.